Potential benefits of slowing the gypsy Moth's spread

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 65-73

  Leuschner, William A ^a   Young, John A ^b   Waldon, Sally A ^c   Ravlin, F William ^c  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEPIDOPTERA; LYMANTRIA DISPAR;

EID: 0002993772     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/20.2.65     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BECK, D.E. AND L. DELLA-BIANCA. 1970. Yield of unthinned yellow-poplar. USDA For. Serv. RP-SE-58.
2. CAMPBELL, R.W., AND RJ. SLOAN. 1977. Forest stand responses to defoliation by the gypsy moth. For. Sci. Monogr. 19.
3. DOOLITTLE, W.T. 1958. Site index comparisons for several forest species in the southern Appalachians. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 22(5):455-458.
4. EYRE, F.H., ED. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Soc. Am. For., Washington, DC.
5. GANSNER, D.A., AND O.W. HERRICK. 1987. Impact of gypsy moth on the timber resource. In Fosbroke, S. and R.R. Hicks, Jr. Proceedings of coping with the gypsy moth in the new frontier. West Va. Univ. Books, Moreantown, WV.
6. GANSNER, D.A., AND O.W. HERRICK. 1984. Guides for estimating stand losses to gypsy moth. North. J. Appl. For. 1(2):21-23.
7. GANSNER, D.A., O.W. HERRICK, P.S. DEBALD, AND R.E. ACCIAVATTI. 1983. Changes in forest condition associated with gypsy moth. J. For. 81 (3): 155-157.
8. GEVORKIANTZ, S.R., AND W.A. DUERR. 1937. A yield table for northern hardwood in the lake states. J. For. 35:340-343.
9. HANSEN, M.H., T. FRIESWYK, J. F. GLOVER, AND J.F. KELLY. 1992. The eastwide forest inventory data base: Data base description and user's manual. USDA For. Serv. GTR-NC-151.
10. JAKUS, P., AND V.K. SMITH. 1991. Measuring use and nonuse values for landscape amentities: A contingent behavior analysis of gypsy moth control. Resour. for the Future, Discuss. Pap. QE92-07. Washington, DC.
11. KETRON, INC. 1978. Final report: A cost/benefit analysis for gypsy moth containment. Kctron, Inc., Arlington, VA. Unpublished report.
12. LEUSCHNER, W.A., AND P. BERCK. 1985. Impacts on forest uses and values. In Integrated pest management in pine-bark beetle ecosystems, Waters, W.W., et al. (eds.). Wiley, NY.
13. LEUSCHNER, W.A., AND R.L. YOUNG. 1978. Estimating the southern pine beetle's impact on reservoir campsites. For. Sci. 24(4):527-537.
14. LIEBHOLD, A.M., J.A. HALVERSON, AND G.A. ELMES. 1992. Gypsy moth invasion in North America: A quantitative analysis. J. Biogeog. 19:513-520.
15. MCCLURE, J.P., AND H.A. KNIGHT. 1984. Empirical yields of timber and forest biomass in the southeast. USDA For. Serv. RP-SE-245.
16. MILLER, J.D., AND B.S. LINDSAY. 1993. Willingness to pay for a state gypsy moth control program in New Hampshire: A contingent valuation case study. J. Econ. Entomol. 86(3):828-837.
17. MCMANIS, M.L., AND T. MCINTYRE. 1981. In The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management, Doane, C.C., and M.L. McManus (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Tech. Bull. 1584, Washington, DC.
18. NORRIS, F. Various. Timber Mart-South. Box 1278, Highlands, NC.
19. RASTETTER, E.B., ET AL. 1992. Aggregating fine-scale ecological knowledge to model coarser-scale attributes of ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 2(1):55-70.
20. ROW, C., H.F. KAISER, AND J. SESSIONS. 1981. Discount rate for long-term Forest Service investments. J. For. 79:367-369.
21. SCHNUR, G.L. 1937. Yield, stand, and volume tables for even-aged upland oak forests. USDA Tech. Bull. 560. Washington, DC.
22. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. 1988. Benefit-cost analysis of the Maryland integrated pest management pilot project. Final Report, 1988. Unpublished office report.
23. USDA FOREST SERVICE. 1988. The South's fourth forest: Alternatives for the future. USDA For. Serv. FRP No. 24., Washington, DC.
24. USDA FOREST SERVICE. 1984. Draft environmental impact statement; 1985-2030 resources planning act program. USDA For. Serv., Washington, DC.
25. USDC Bureau of the Census. 1988. County and city data book. Washington, DC.