Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with relativistic massive particles

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 72-77

  Czachor, Marek ^a  

^a Politechnika Gdan acuteska   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002910653     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.72     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
2. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1951).
3. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).
4. D. Home and F. Selleri, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 14, (9) (1991).
5. A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
6. P. G. Kwiat, P. H. Eberhard, A. M. Steinberg and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3209 (1994).
7. E. S. Fry, T. Walther and S. Li, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4381 (1995).
8. C. Møller, Communication from Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, No. 5, 1949 (unpublished).
9. E. Schrödinger, Sitzungsb. Preuss. Acad. Wiss. Phys. Math. Kl. 24, 418 (1930);
10. E. Schrödinger, Sitzungsb. Preuss. Acad. Wiss. Phys. Math. Kl. 3, 1 (1931).
11. A. O. Barut and A. J. Bracken, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2454 (1981).
12. N. Mukunda, H. van Dam, and L. C. Biedenharn, Relativistic Models of Extended Hadrons Obeying a Mass-Spin Trajectory Constraint, Vol. 165 of Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
13. A. O. Barut and N. Zanghi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2009 (1984);
14. A. O. Barut and W. Thacker, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1386 (1985);
15. W. A. Rodriguez, Jr., J. Vaz, Jr., E. Recami and G. Salesi, Phys. Lett. B 318, 623 (1993);
16. J. Vaz, Jr., and W. A. Rodriguez,., Phys. Lett. B 319, 203 (1993);
17. J. Vaz, Jr.,., Phys. Lett. B 344, 149 (1995).
18. G. N. Fleming, Phys. Rev. 137, B188 (1965);
19. G. N. Fleming, Phys. Rev. 139, B963 (1965).
20. Y. Ohnuki, Unitary Representations of the Poincaré Group and Relativistic Wave Equations (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
21. A. Z. Jadczyk and B. Jancewicz, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 21, 477 (1973).
22. J. Mourad, Phys. Lett. A 182, 319 (1993).
23. I. Białynicki-Birula and Z. Białynicka-Birula, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2383 (1987).
24. A. K. Pati, Phys. Lett. A 218, 5 (1996).
25. M. H. L. Pryce, Proc. R. Soc. London A 195, 62 (1948).
26. H. Bacry, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 49, 245 (1988).
27. A. O. Barut and A. J. Bracken, Phys. Rev. D 24, 3333 (1981).
28. M. Czachor and A. Posiewnik, Report No. quant-ph/9501017, 1995 (unpublished).
29. Typically the Euclidean structure of massless fields is interpreted in the language of finite dimensional and nonunitary representations. It can be shown that the SE(2) structure is associated with a cylindrical geometry: The cylinder is parallel to momentum and the group contains rotations around and translations along the cylinder. The translations are gauge transformations of a vector potential. The relativistic spin algebra discussed in this paper provides an explanation of the contraction in terms of relativistic deformations of an extended spinning particle and the corresponding deformation of the spin algebra. The analogy between the two approaches is, however, even deeper: The noncommuting position operator allows for localizations of the Maxwell fields on curves 15 and the classical phase-space picture derived in 27 leads to world tubes rather than world lines. An analogous phenomenon is found in the twistor formulation where instead of world lines the massless fields are interepreted in terms of the Robinson congruence of twisting null world lines 28. The cylindrical approach is described in Y. S. Kim and M. E. Noz, Phys. Rev. D 15, 335 (1977);
30. Y. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 348 (1989);
31. D. Han, Y. S. Kim and D. Son, Am. J. Phys. 54, 818 (1986);
32. D. Han, Y. S. Kim and D. Son, Phys. Lett. 131B, 327 (1983);
33. D. Han and Y. S. Kim, Am. J. Phys. 49, 348 (1981);
34. J. J. van der Bij, H. van Dam and Y. J. Ng, Physica 116A, 307 (1982);
35. D. Han, Y. S. Kim and D. Son, Phys. Rev. D 26, 3717 (1982);
36. Y. S. Kim and M. E. Noz, Theory and Applications of the Poincaré Group (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986);
37. Y. S. Kim and E. P. Wigner, J. Math. Phys. 28, 1175 (1987);
38. Y. S. Kim and E. P. Wigner, J. Math. Phys. 31, 55 (1990).
39. P. Garbaczewski, in Problems in Quantum Physics: Gdańsk '87, edited by L. Kostro et al (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
40. S. Zakrzewski, J. Phys. A 28, 7347 (1995).
41. R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1986), Vol. 2;
42. A. Bette, J. Math. Phys. 25, 2456 (1984);
43. A. Bette, Rep. Math. Phys. 28, 133 (1989).
44. A. J. Kalnay, The Localization Problem, in Studies in the Foundation, Methodology and Philosophy of Sciences, edited by M. Bunge (Springer, Berlin, 1971), Vol. 4;
45. A. O. Barut and R. Ra̧czka, Theory of Group Representations and Applications (Polish Scientific, Warszawa, 1980);
46. D. Hestenes, J. Math. Phys. 14, 893 (1973);
47. D. Hestenes, Found. Phys. 20, 1213 (1990); J. Vaz, Jr. and W. A. Rodrigues, in Clifford Algebras and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics, edited by F. Brackx et al (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993).
48. See also I. Białynicki-Birula, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 9, 905 (1957);
49. I. Białynicki-Birula and Z. Białynicka-Birula, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 12, 1119 (1957);
50. I. Białynicki-Birula, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 12, 1123 (1957).