Testing tasks: Issues in task design and the group oral

Language Testing

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 23-51

  Fulcher, Glenn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002862197     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: 14770946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026553229601300103     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Actfl 1986: ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
2. Alderson, J.C. 1985: Innovations in language testing? In Portal, M., editor, Innovations in language testing. Slough: NFER-Nelson, 93-105.
3. Alderson, J.C., Krahnke, K.J. and Stansfield, C., editors, 1987: Reviews of English language proficiency tests. Washington, DC: TESOL.
4. Alderson, J.C. and North, B., editors, 1991: Language testing in the 1990s. London: Modern English Publications and the British Council.
5. Bachman, L.F. 1990: Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bachman, L.F. and Savignon, S.J. 1986: The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: a critique of the ACTFL oral interview. Modern Language Journal 70, 380-90.
7. Bartz, W.M. 1979: Testing oral communication in the foreign language classroom. Language in Education: Theory and Practice 17. Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.
8. Berkoff, N.A. 1985: Testing oral proficiency: a new approach. In Lee, Y.P., editor, New directions in language testing. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English, 93-100.
9. Brown, A. 1993: The role of test-taker feedback in the test development process: test-takers' reactions to a tape-mediated test of proficiency in spoken Japanese. Language Testing 10, 277-303.
10. Ellis, R. 1992: Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
11. Folland, D. and Robertson, D. 1976: Towards objectivity in group oral testing. English Language Teaching Journal 30, 156-67.
12. Fulcher, G. forthcoming, 1995: Variable competence in second language acquisition: a problem for research methodology? System 23, 1.
13. Galassi, J.P., Frierson, H.T. and Siegel, R.G. 1984: Cognitions, test anxiety, and test performance: a closer look. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52, 319-20.
14. Gregg, K. 1990: The variable competence model of second language acquisition, and why it isn't? Applied Linguistics 11, 364-81.
15. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. 1985: Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Australia: Deakin University Press.
16. Harder, P. 1980. Discourse as self-expression - on the reduced personality of the second-language learner. Applied Linguistics 1, 262-70.
17. Hatch, E. 1992: Discourse and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hilsdon, J. 1991: The group oral exam. Advantages and limitations. In Alderson, J.C. and North, B., editors, Language testing in the 1990s.
19. Hughes, A. 1989: Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Modern English Publications and the British Council 187-9.
20. Ingram, D. 1985: Assessing proficiency: an overview on some aspects of testing. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M. editors, Modeling and assessing second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press, 215-276.
21. Kenyon, D.M. and Stansfield, C. 1991: A method for improving tasks on performance assessments through field testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.
22. Lazaraton, A. 1992: The structural organization of a language interview: a conversation analytic perspective. System 20, 373-86.
23. Linacre, J.M. 1991: FACETS computer program for many faceted Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.
24. Linacre, J.M. and Wright, B.D. 1990: Facets: many faceted Rasch analysis. Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.
25. Long, M. 1983: Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 4, 126-41.
26. Lowe, P. 1983: The ILR oral interview: origins, applications, pitfalls, and implications. Die Unterrichtspraxis 16, 230-44.
27. Lowe P. 1987: Interagency language roundtable proficiency interview. In Alderson, J.C., Krahnke, K.J. and Stansfield, C., editors, Reviews of English language testing. Washington DC: TESOL, 43-47.
28. Lowe, P. and Liskin-Gasparro, J. 1986: Testing speaking proficiency: the oral interview. Washington, DC: ERIC Digest.
29. MacPhail, J. 1985: Oral assessment interviews: suggestions for participants. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Lancaster, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages.
30. Madsen, H.S. and Murray, N. 1984: Retrospective evaluation of testing in ESL content and skills courses. Unpublished manuscript, Brigham Young University.
31. Messick, S. 1994: The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher 23, 13-23.
32. Morrison, D.M. and Lee, N. 1985: Simulating an academic tutorial: a test validation study. In Lee, Y.P., editor, New directions in language testing. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English, 85-92.
33. Morrow, K. 1982: Testing spoken language. In Heaton, J.B., editor, Language testing. London: Modern English Publications, 56-58.
34. Nobuyoshi, J. and Ellis, R. 1993. Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. English Language Teaching Journal 47, 203-10.
35. Nunan, D. 1989: Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Perrett, G. 1990: The language testing interview: a reappraisal. In de Jong, J.H.A.L. and Stevenson, D.K., editors, Individualizing the assessment of language abilities. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters, 225-38. Reves, T. 1980: The group-oral test: an experiment. English Teachers' Journal 24, 19-21.
37. Perrett, G.,Reves, T. 1991: From testing research to educational policy: a comprehensive test of oral proficiency. In Alderson, J.C. and North, B., editors, Language testing in the 1990s. London: Modern English Publications and the British Council, 178-88.
38. Robertson, E.F. 1993: Can oral tests be made more communicative? Testing Newsletter (IA TEFL Testing Special Interest Group) December, 15-16.
39. Rodriguez, M.C. 1984: The current status of the OPI in intensive language programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Colorado Springs, CO.
40. Savignon, S.J. 1972: Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia, PA: The Center for Curriculum Development.
41. Scarcella, R.C. 1983: Discourse accent in second language performance. In Gass, S.M. and Selinker, L., editors, Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 306-26.
42. Scott, M.L. 1986: Student affective reactions to oral language tests. Language Testing 3, 99-118.
43. Shohamy, E. 1983: The stability of oral proficiency assessment in the oral interview procedure. Language Learning 33, 527-40.
44. Shohamy E. 1988: A proposed framework for testing the oral language of second/ foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, 165-79.
45. Shohamy E. 1990a: Language testing priorities: a different perspective. Foreign Language Annals 23, 385-94.
46. Shohamy E. 1990b: Discourse analysis in language testing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 11, 115-28.
47. Shohamy E., Reves, T. and Bejarano, Y. 1986: Introducing a new comprehensive test of oral proficiency. English Language Teaching Journal 40, 212-20.
48. Shohamy, E. and Stansfield, C. 1990: The Hebrew speaking test: an example of international cooperation in test development and validation. In de Jong, H.A.L., editor, Standardization in language testing. Philadelphia, PA: 79-90.
49. Silverman, D. 1976: Interview talk: bringing off a research instrument. In Silverman, D. and Jones, J., editors, Organizational work: the language of grading, the grading of language. London: Collier Macmillan, 133-50.
50. Skehan, P. 1987: Variability and language testing. In Ellis, R., editor, Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters, 195-206.
51. Stansfield, C.W. and Kenyon, D.M. 1992: Comparing the scaling of speaking tasks by language teachers and by the ACTFL guidelines. Paper presented at the 14th annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, Vancouver, BC.
52. Stevenson, D.K. 1985a: Authenticity, validity and a tea party. Language Testing 2, 41-47.
53. Stevenson D.K. 1985b: Pop validity and performance testing. In Lee, Y.P., editor, New directions in language testing. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English, 111-18.
54. Tarone, E. 1983: On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics 4, 146-63.
55. Tarone E. 1985: Variability in interlanguage use: a study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning 35, 373-403.
56. Underhill, N. 1987: Testing spoken language: a handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Upshur, J.A. 1971: Objective evaluation of oral proficiency in the ESOL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 5, 47-59.
58. van Lier, L. 1989: Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching, and fainting in coils: oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly 23, 489-508.
59. van Weeren, J. 1981: Testing oral proficiency in everyday situations. In Klein-Braley, C. and Stevenson, D.K., editors, Practice and problems in language testing. Volume 1. Frankfurt: Bem, 54-59.
60. Weir, C. 1988: Communicative language testing. Exeter: University of Exeter.
61. Wilds, C. 1979: The measurement of speaking and reading proficiency in a foreign language. In Adams, M.L. and Frith, J.R., editors, Testing kit: French and Spanish. Department of State: Foreign Service Institute.
62. Wilkinson, A. 1968: The testing of oracy. In Davies, A., editor, Language testing symposium. Oxford University Press, 117-32.
63. Young, D. 1986: The relationship between anxiety and foreign language proficiency ratings. Foreign Language Annals 19, 439-45.
64. Zuengler, J. 1993: Encouraging learners' conversational participation: the effect of content knowledge. Language Learning 43, 403-32.