Question Answering from Large Document Collections

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-99-02, Issue , 1999, Pages 26-31

  Breck, Eric ^a   Burger, John ^a   House, David ^a   Light, Marc ^a   Mani, Inderjeet ^a  

^a The MITRECorporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

'CURRENT; COMBINING TECHNIQUES; DOCUMENT COLLECTION; DOMAIN INDEPENDENCES; HYBRID DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; KNOWLEDGE-REPRESENTATION; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; QUESTION ANSWERING; QUESTION ANSWERING SYSTEMS;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 0002846333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. th Intl. ACM SIGIR Conf on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR-93). 181-190. Pittsburgh, Penna.
2. th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 325-332. College Park, Maryland.
3. Lenat, DouglasB. 1995. Artificial Intelligence. Scientific American, September:g0-82.
4. Mani, Inderjeet and Eric Bloedorn 1999. Summarizing Similarities and Differences AmongRelated Documents. InformationRetrieval, 1:35-67.
5. th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 558-565. College Park, Maryland.
6. Miller, George 1990. WordNet: An On-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography,3:4.
7. Rocchio, J.J. 1971. Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval. In The SMARTRetrieval System, 313-323. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc.
8. Vilain, Marcand DavidDay1996. Finite-State Parsing by Rule Sequences. International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96).Copenhagen, Denmark. The International Committee on Computational Linguistics.
9. Voorhees, Ellen M. and Donna K. Harman 1999. The Eighth Text Retrieval Conference. NIST Special Publications. Forthcoming.