Traffic engineering and occupational therapy: A collaborative approach for future directions

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 21-28

  Iwarsson, Susanne ^a   Ståhl, Agneta ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Disability; Environment; Handicap; I ADL; Impairment; Public transportation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002773804     PISSN: 11038128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/110381299443816     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. United Nations (UN). Standard rules on the equalisation of opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York: UN, 1993.
2. Ståhl A, Brundell-Freij K, Makrí M. The adaptation of the Swedish public transportation system - yesterday, today and tomorrow. An evaluation. TFB-rapport 1993: 14. Stockholm: TFB, 1993.
3. Holmberg B, Hydén C. Trafiken i samhället. Grunder för planering och utformning. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, 1996 (in Swedish).
4. Meyer A. The philosophy of occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 1922, reprinted 1977; 31: 639-42.
5. Christiansen C. Occupational therapy: intervention for life performance. In: Christiansen C, Baum C, eds. Occupational therapy: overcoming human performance deficits. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc, 1991.
6. Kielhofner G. Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, 1992.
7. Miller BRJ, Sieg KW, Ludwig FM, Shortridge SD, Van Deusen J. Six perspectives on theory for the practice of occupational therapy. Aspen, US: Rockville, MD, 1988.
8. Yerxa EJ, Clark FA, Frank G, et al. An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occup Ther Health Care 1990; 6: 1-17.
9. Reilly M. A psychiatric occupational therapy program as a teaching model. Am J Occup Ther 1966; 22: 61-67.
10. Cooper BA, Cohen U, Hasselkus BR. Barrier-free design: a review and critique of the occupational therapy perspective. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 45: 344-350.
11. Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å. Basic accessibility in modern housing - a key to the problems of care in the domestic setting. Scand J Caring Sci 1993; 7: 155-159.
12. El-Faizy M, Reinsch S. Home safety intervention for the prevention of falls. Phys Occup Ther Geriatrics 1994; 12: 33-49.
13. Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å. Housing standards, environmental barriers in the home, and subjective general apprehension of housing situation among the rural elderly. Scand J Occup Ther 1996; 3: 52-61.
14. Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å. Quality of life in the elderly population: an example exploring interrelationships among subjective well-being, ADL dependence, and housing accessibility. Arch Gerontol Geriatrics 1997; 26: 71-83.
15. Trickey F, Maltais D, Gosselin C, Robitaille Y. Adapting older persons' homes to promote independence. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 1993; 12: 1-14.
16. Spencer JC. The physical environment and performance. In: Christiansen C, Baum C, eds. Occupational therapy: overcoming human performance deficits. Thorofare, NJ, US: SLACK Inc, 1991.
17. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, CAOT. Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT, 1997.
18. Ståhl A. Changing mobility patterns and the ageing population in Sweden. Transp Res Rec 1987; 1135: 37-41.
19. Ståhl A, Åhlund O. Housing and transportation for the elderly in sparsely populated areas in Sweden - a holistic approach. Proceedings of the III European Congress of Gerontology, Holland, 1995.
20. Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å. On scaling methodology and environmental influences in disability assessments: the cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL among older adults in a Swedish rural district. Can J Occup Ther 1997; 64: 240-251.
21. McDonough PA, Badley EM, Tennant A. Disability, resources, role demands and mobility handicap. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 159-168.
22. Law M. The Muriel Driver Lecture: The environment: a focus for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1991; 58: 171-179.
23. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps, ICIDH. Geneva: WHO, 1980, revised version 1993.
24. Iwarsson S. Functional capacity and physical environmental demand. Exploration of factors influencing everyday activity and health in the elderly population. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Lund, Sweden, 1997.
25. Nordenfelt L. On the notions of disability and handicap. Scand J Soc Wel 1993; 2: 17-24.
26. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1-14.
27. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, activities and participation: A manual of dimensions of disablement and health, ICIDH-2. [Internet]. Available: http://www.who.ch (Jan 28th), 1998.
28. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. J Am Med Assoc 1963; 185: 914-919.
29. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9: 179-186.
30. Sonn U, Hulter-Asberg K. Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-years-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand J Rehabil Med 1991; 23: 193-202.
31. Barris R. Activity: the interface between person and environment. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 1986; 5: 39-49.
32. Fougeyrollas P. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contributions relating to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 145-153.
33. Zemke R, Clark FA, editors. Occupational science: the evolving discipline. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, 1996.
34. Lawton MP. Environment and aging. Los Angeles: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, 1980.
35. Lawton MP, Nahemow L. Ecology and the aging process. In: Eisdorfer C, Lawton P, eds. The psychology of adult development and Aging. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 1973.
36. Svensson T. Aging and environment. Dissertation No. 21. University of Linköping, Sweden, 1984.
37. Iwarsson S, Isacsson A. Development of a novel instrument for occupational therapy assessment of the physical environment in the home - a methodologic study on "the enabler". Occup Ther J Res 1996; 16: 227-244.
38. Börjesson M. Kollektivtrafik för alla. Sammanfattning av resultat från TFB-stödd forskning och utveckling om handikappade och trafik. Stockholm: TFB, 1988 (in Swedish).
39. Transportrådet. Handikappanpassning av kollektivtrafiken. Utvärdering av tio års anpassningsarbete och förslag till inriktning under 1990-talet. Stockholm: Transportrådet, 1990 (in Swedish).
40. Statens offentliga utredningar SOU 1995:70. Allmänna kommunikationer - för alla? Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget, 1995 (in Swedish).
41. Ståhl A, Petzäll J. Utvärdering av Riksfärdtjänsten. (NHR, RBU, RMR, RTP). Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, University of Lund, Sweden, 1996 (in Swedish).
42. Laukkanen P, Sakari-Rantala R, Kauppinen M, Heikkinen E. Morbidity and disability in 75- and 80-year-old men and women. A five-year follow-up. Scand J Soc Med 1997; 25 Suppl 53: 79-100.
43. Iwarsson S. Environmental influences on the cumulative structure of instrumental ADL: an example in osteoporosis patients in a Swedish rural district. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 231-237.
44. Ståhl A. Adaptation of the whole travel chain - benefits and attitudes. Proceedings for the 23rd PTRC European Transport Forum, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, 1996.
45. Ståhl A. Möjligheter att tillgodose delar av färdtjänstbehovet inom kollektivtrafiken. Stockholm: TFB, 1985 (in Swedish).
46. Blennemann F. The low floor concept - advantages for elderly and handicapped. 19th PTRC Conference Seminar, 1991.
47. Briaux-Trouverie C, Dejeammes M. Proposal for specifications for the accessibility of all people to urban buses. 20th PTRC Conference Seminar, 1992.
48. Dejeammes M, Dolivet C. Urban public transport systems: evaluation of their accessibility in France. France: INRETS, 1995.
49. COST 322. Low floor buses. Brussels, 1996.
50. ECMT Transport for people with mobility handicaps. Public transport by bus. Paris: ECMT, 1991.
51. Lesauvage M, Dejeammes M, Carvalhais J. Experiences of street-level access to buses in the French city of Caen. 22nd PTRC Conference Seminar, 1995.
52. Ståhl A. Planning for a community responsive public transport system - the Swedish model. In: Philips et al. Broadening our vision of planning and community care for older people 21-8. England: Anchor research, 1998.
53. Oxley P, Benwell M. An experiment study of the use of buses by elderly and disabled people. Rapport TRRL No. 33, 1995.
54. Suen L, Turnbull A. Accessible transportation - the Canadian experience. Canada: Transport Canada, 1995.
55. ECMT Transport for people with mobility handicaps. Information and communication. Paris: ECMT, 1991.
56. Ståhl A, Brundell-Freij K. Information inför kollektivresan - Funktionshindrades behov och anordnares nuvarande utbud. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, University of Lund, Sweden, 1994 (in Swedish).
57. TELSCAN. Inventory of ATT system requirements for elderly and disabled drivers and travellers. Deliverable 3.1, 1997.
58. Holmberg B, Ståhl A. Information om kollektivtrafik och samåkning. Publikation 1997: 60, Borlänge, Sweden: Vägverket, 1997 (in Swedish).
59. ECMT Transport for people with mobility handicaps. Access to taxis. Paris: ECMT, 1992.
60. Petzäll J. Fordon och hjälpmedel för funktionshindrade i kollektivtrafiken. Probleminventering och nulägesbeskrivning. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, University of Lund, Sweden, 1996 (in Swedish)
61. Ståhl A. Providing transportation for the elderly and disabled in Sweden. Experiences gained and future trends. TFB-rapport 1991: 17. Stockholm, 1991.
62. Ståhl A. Service routes or low-floor buses. Study of the travel behaviour among elderly and disabled people. Proceedings of the TRANSED'98, 8th International Conference on Mobility and Transport for Elderly and Disabled People, Australia, 1998.
63. Tranter RT, Slater R, Vaughan N. arriers to mobility: physically-disabled and frail elderly people in their local outdoor environment. Int J Rehabil Res 1991; 14: 303-332.
64. Tranter RT, Slater R, Vaughan N. hysically disabled and frail elderly: assessing their external environments. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 305-331.
65. Lavery I, Davey S, Woodside A, Ewart K. he vital role of street design and management in reducing barriers to older people's mobility. Landsc Urban Plan 1996; 35: 181-192.
66. Steinfeld E, Schroeder S, Duncan J, et al. Access to the built environments: a review of the literature. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1979.
67. Iwarsson S. ENABLER - En metod för analys av tillgänglighetsproblem i boendet. Manual och bedömningsblanketter. Samhälle, Individ, Hälsa, rapport 15. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Lund, Sweden. 1997 (in Swedish; manuscript available in English).
68. Golant SM. Understanding the diverse housing environments of the elderly. Environments 1984; 618: 35-51.
69. Steinfeld E, Shea S. Enabling home environments. Identifying barriers to independence. Technol Disabil 1993; 2: 69-79.
70. Webb P, editor. Health promotion and patient education. A professional's guide. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.
71. Haglund BJA. Stödjande miljöer för hälsa - ett strategiskt begrepp för det hälsofrämjande arbetet. Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 1996; 73: 91-99 (in Swedish).
72. Dodge J, Knutesen P. Enhancing health and function in late life. In: Webb P, ed. Health promotion and patient education. A professional. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.