Localisation or mainstream bending in urban regeneration?: European experience

Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 72-86

  Turok, Ivan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002717998     PISSN: 02690942     EISSN: 14709325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02690949908726476     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Area Development Management (ADM) 1995: Integrated local development handbook, Dublin.
2. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) 1998: Communitybased regeneration initiatives: a working paper, London.
3. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) 1997: Regeneration programmes — the way forward, Discussion Paper, London.
4. Hastings A. 1996: Unravelling the process of “partnership” in urban regeneration policy, Urban Studies, Vol 33, pp. 253–68.
5. Jessop B. 1994: Post-fordism and the state, in Amin A. (ed) Post-fordism: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell.
6. MacKintosh M. 1992: Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation, Local Economy, Vol 7, pp 210–24.
7. OECD 1996: Ireland: local partnerships and social innovation, Paris: OECD.
8. Raco M. 1999: Assessing community participation in local economic development — lessons for the new urban policy, Political Geography, Vol 18.
9. Rodgers M. 1995: Area based economic development, Glasgow City Council, Working Paper.
10. Social Exclusion Unit 1998: Bringing Britain together: a national strategy for neighbourhood renewal, Cm 4045, HMSO.
11. Turok I. 1999: Inclusive cities: building local capacity for development, report and policy guidelines, Glasgow Development Agency and European Commission. Further details available from the author.
12. Walsh J. 1998: Local development and local government in the Republic of Ireland, Local Economy, Vol 12, No 4, 329–41.