Concerning practices of interviewers when using anatomical dolls in child protective services investigations

Child Maltreatment

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 96-104

  Boat, Barbara W ^a,c   Everson, Mark D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002687608     PISSN: 10775595     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077559596001002002     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (1995). Practice guidelines: Use of anatomical dolls in child sexual abuse assessment. Chicago: Author.
2. Boat, B. W., & Everson, M. D. (1988). Use of anatomical dolls among professionals in sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect, 12,126-133.
3. Boat, B. W., & Everson, M. D. (1993). The use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations: Current research and practice. In G. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving children's testimony (pp. 47-71). New York: Guilford.
4. Conte, J. R., Sorenson, E., Fogarty, L., & Rosa.J. D. (1991). Evaluating children's reports of sexual abuse: Results from a survey of professionals. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 428-437.
5. Everson, M. D., & Boat, B. W. (1994). Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: An examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18,113-130.
6. Inre Amber B. and Teele B., 191 Cal. App. 3rd 682 (1987).
7. In re Christine C. and Michael C., 191 Cal. App. 3rd 676 (1987).
8. Jones, D.P.H., & McGraw, J. M. (1987). Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse of children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2,27-45.
9. Kendall-Tackett, K. A., & Watson, M. W. (1992). Use of anatomical dolls by Boston-area professionals. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 423-428.
10. Koocher, G. P., Goodman, G. S., White, C. S., Friedrich, W. N., Sivan, A. B., & Reynolds C. R. (1995). Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments. Psychological Bulletin, 118,199-222.
11. Wescott, H., Davies, G., & Clifford B. (1989). The use of anatomical dolls in child witness interviews. Adoption and Fostering, 13, 6-14.
12. Yuille, J. (n.d.). The step-wise interview: A protocol for interviewing children. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia.