Physiological organization of syllables: A review

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 23-54

  Krakow, Rena A ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002635113     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0089     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Anderson J., Jones C. Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics. 10:1974;1-26.
2. Baer T., Lofqvist A., McGarr N. S. Laryngeal vibrations: a comparison between high-speed filming and glottographic techniques. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 73:1983;1304-1308.
3. Bailey C. J. Gradience in English syllabication and a revised concept of unmarked syllabication. 1978;Indiana University Linguistics Club, Blomington.
4. Bell A., Hooper J. B. Issues and evidence in syllabic phonology. Bell A., Hooper J. Syllables and Segments. 1978;3-24 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
5. Bell-Berti F., Krakow R. A. Anticipatory velar lowering: a coproduction account. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 90:1991;112-123.
6. Boucher V. A parameter of syllabification for V stop V and relative-timing invariance. Journal of Phonetics. 16:1988;299-326.
7. Boyce S. E., Krakow R. A., Bell-Berti F. Phonological underspecification and speech motor organization. Phonology. 8:1991;219-236.
8. Browman C. P., Goldstein O. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearkbook. 3:1986;219-252.
9. Browman C. P., Goldstein L. G. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica. 49:1992;155-180.
10. Browman C. P., Goldstein L. G. Gestural syllable position effects in American English. Bell-Berti F., Raphael L. J. Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues. 1995;19-33 AIP Press, Woodbury.
11. Chen M. W., Wang W. S.-Y. Sound change: Actuation and implementation. Language. 51:1975;255-281.
12. Clark J., Yallop C. An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. 1990;Basil Blackwell, Cambridge.
13. Clumeck H. Patterns of soft palate movements. Journal of Phonetics. 4:1976;337-351.
14. Draper M. H., Ladefoged P., Whitteridge D. Respiratory muscles in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 2:1959;16-27.
15. Fougeron C., Keating P. A. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 101:1997;3728-3740.
16. Fowler C. A. Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 46:1981;127-139.
17. Fujimura, O. 1977, Recent findings on articulatory processes - velum and tongue movement as syllable features.
18. Fujimura O. Methods and goals of speech production research. Language and Speech. 33:1990;195-258.
19. Fujimura O. C/D Model: A computational model of phonetic implementation. Ristad E. S. Language and Computations. 1994;1-20 American Math Society, Providence.
20. Fujimura O. Prosodic organization of speech based on syllables: The C/D model. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 3:1995;10-17.
21. Fujimura O. Syllable features and temporal structure of speech. Palek B. Proceedings of LP '96. 1997;St. Charles University Press, Prague.
22. Fujimura, O. Miller, J. E. Kiritani, S. 1977, A computer-controlled X-ray microbeam study of articulatory characteristics of nasal consonants in English and Japanese.
23. Gay T. Articulatory units: Segments or syllables? Bell A., Hooper J. Syllables and Segments. 1978;121-132 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
24. Gelfer C. E., Bell-Berti F., Harris K. S. Determining the extent of coarticulation: effects of experimental design. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 86:1989;2443-2445.
25. Giles S. B., Moll K. L. Cinefluorographic study of selected allophones of English /l/. Phonetica. 31:1975;206-227.
26. Hardcastle W. J., Barry W. J. Articulatory and perceptual factors in /l/ vocalizations in English. Work in Progress at the University of Reading Phonology Laboratory. 5:1985;31-44.
27. Harris K. S. Physiological measures of speech movements: EMG and fibroptic studies. ASHA Reports. 5:1970;271-282.
28. Harris K. S., Bell-Berti F. On consonants and syllable boundaries. Raphael L. J., Valdovinos M. R. Language and Cognition. 1984;89-95 Plenum Publishing Co.
29. Henderson J. B. Velopharyngeal function in oral and nasal vowels. 1984;University of Connecticut, Storrs.
30. Hoard J. E. Aspiration, tenseness, and syllabication in English. Language. 47:1971;133-140.
31. Horiguchi S., Bell-Berti F. The Velotrace: A device for monitoring velar position. Cleft Palate Journal. 24:1987;104-111.
32. Kahn D. Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology. 1976;Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
33. Kawasaki H. Phonetic explanation for phonological universals: The case for distinctive vowel nasalization. Ohala J. J., Jaeger J. J. Experimental Phonology. 1986;81-103 MIT Press, Cambridge.
34. Kay B. A., Munhall K. G., Vatikiotis-Bateson E., Kelso J. A. S. Processing movement data at Haskins: Sampling, filtering, and diferentiation. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research. 81:1985;291-303.
35. Keating P. Effects of prosodic position on /t,d/ tongue/palate contact. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 3:1995a;432-435.
36. Keating P. Segmental phonology and non-segmental phonetics. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 3:1995b;26-32.
37. Kelso J. A. S., Munhall K. G. R. H. Stetson's Motor Phonetics: Retrospective Edition. 1988;College Hill, Boston.
38. Kenstowicz M., Kisseberth C. Generative Phonology. 1979;Academic Press, New York.
39. Kent R. D., Carney P. J., Severeid L. R. Velar movement and timing: evaluation of a model of binary control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 17:1974;470-488.
40. Kent R. D., Minifie F. D. Coarticulation in recent speech production models. Journal of Phonetics. 5:1977;115-133.
41. Kent R. D., Read C. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. 1992;Singular, San Diego.
42. Kiritani S., Hirose H., Sawashima M. Simultaneous X-ray microbeam and EMG study of velum movement for Japanese nasal sounds. Annual Bulletin Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. 14:1980;91-100.
43. Kiritani S., Itoh K., Fujimura O. Tongue-pellet tracking by a computer controlled X-ray microbeam system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 57:1975;1516-1520.
44. Kozhevnikov V., Chistovich L. Speech: Articulation and Perception. 1965;Joint Publications Research Service, Washington.
45. Krakow R. A. The Articulatory Organization of Syllables: A Kinematic Analysis of Labial and Velar Gestures. 1989;Yale University, New Haven.
46. Krakow R. A. Nonsegmental influences on velum movement patterns: Syllables, sentences, stress, and speaking rate. Huffman M. A., Krakow R. A. Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum. 1993;87-116 Academic Press, New York.
47. Krakow R. A., Bell-Berti F., Wang Q. E. Supralaryngeal declination: Evidence from the velum. Bell-Berti F., Raphael L. J. Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues. 1995;333-354 AIP Press, Woodbury.
48. Lehiste I. An acoustic-phonetic study of internal open juncture. Phonetica. 5:1960.
49. Liberman A. M., Cooper F. S., Shankweiler D., Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review. 74:1967;431-461.
50. Locke J. L. Phonological Acquisition and Change. 1983;Academic Press, London.
51. Macchi M. Labial articulation patterns associated with segmental features and syllable structure in English. Phonetica. 45:1988;109-121.
52. Maddieson I. Phonetic cues to syllabification. Fromkin V. Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. 1985;Academic Press, Orlando.
53. Malécot A. The force of articulation of American stops and fricatives as a function of position. Phonetica. 18:1955;95-102.
54. Manuel S. Y. Some phonetic bases for the relative malleability of syllable-final vs. syllable-initial consonants. Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 1991;Universite de Provence, Aix-en-Provence. p. 118-121.
55. Manuel S. Y., Bateson E. V. Oral and glottal gestures and accoustics of underlying /t/ in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 84:1988;S84(A).
56. Mattingly I. G. Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule. Myers T., Laver J., Anderson J. The Cognitive Representation of Speech. 1981;415-419 North-Holland Publs. Holland.
57. Nadler R., Abbs J., Fujimura O. Speech movement research using the new X-ray microbeam system. Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 1987;Talinn, Estonia.
58. Ohala, J. J. 1971, Monitoring soft palate movements during speech.
59. Ohala J. J. Phonetic explanations in phonology. Bruck A., Fox R., LaGaly M. CLS Papers From the Parasession on Natural Phonology. 1974;251-274 Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
60. Ohala J. J. The listener as a source of sound change. Masek C. S., Hendrick R. A., Miller M. F. Papers From the Parasession on Language and Behavior. 1981;178-103 Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
61. Ohala J. J. The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. Kingston J., Beckman M. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
62. Ohala J. J., Kawasaki H. Prosodic phonology and phonetics. Phonology Yearbook. 1:1984;113-128.
63. Öhman S. E. G. Coarticulation in VCV utterances. Journal of theAcoustical Society of America. 39:1966;151-168.
64. Parush A. Movement Organization in Speech Production: Implications from studies of coarticulation. 1984;McGill University, Montreal.
65. Pulgrum E. Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus. 1970;Mouton, The Hague.
66. Saltzman E., Kelso J. A. S. Skilled actions: A task dynamic approach. Psychological Review. 94:1987;84-106.
67. Schourup A. A cross-language study of vowel nasalization. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics. 15:1973;190-221.
68. Selkirk, E. O. 1982, The syllable, The Structure of Phonological Representations, H. van der HulstN. Smith, The Structure of Phonological Representations, Dordrecht, Foris Publications, 337, 383.
69. Sproat R., Fujimura O. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics. 21:1993;291-311.
70. Stetson R. H. Motor Phonetics: A Study of Speech Movements in Articulation. 1951;North Holland, Amsterdam.
71. Tranel B. The Sounds of French: An Introduction. 1987;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
72. Tuller B., Kelso J. A. S. Phase transitions in speech production and their perceptual consequences. Jeannerod M. Attention and Performance XIII. 1990;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
73. Tuller B., Kelso J. A. S. The production and perception of syllable structure. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 34:1991;501-508.
74. Turk A. Articulator phonetic cues to syllable affiliation: gestural characteristics of bilabial stops. Keating P. Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form. 1994;107-135 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
75. Ushijima T., Hirose H. Electromyographic study of the velum during speech. Journal of Phonetics. 2:1974;315-236.
76. Ushijima T., Sawashima M. Fiberscopic examination of velar movements during speech. Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. 1972;25-38.
77. Vance T. An Introduction to Japanese Phonology. 1987;State University of New York Press, Albany.
78. Vihman M. M. Phonological Development. The Origins of Language in the Child. 1996;Blackwell Publications, Cambridge.
79. Wang Q. E. Are Syllables Units of Speech Motor Organization? - A Kinematic Analysis of Labial and Velar Gestures in Cantonese. 1995;Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs.
80. Weismer G., Dinnsen D., Elbert M. A study of the voicing distinction associated with omitted, word-final stops. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 46:1981;320-328.