The future of accounting, part III: Reliability and auditor independence

Accounting Horizons

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 76-97

  Wallman, Steven M H ^a  

^a US Securities and Exchange Commission

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002609453     PISSN: 08887993     EISSN: 15587975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (27)

1. Arthur Andersen & Co., Coopers & Lybrand, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG Peat Marwick, and Price Waterhouse. 1991. The Public Accounting Profession: Meeting the Needs of a Changing World.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1992a. AICPA Professional Standards: Article II - The Public Interest. New York, NY: AICPA.
3. -. 1992b. AICPA Professional Standards: Article IV - Objectivity and Independence. New York, NY: AICPA.
4. -. 1994a. AICPA Professional Standards: AU Section 336: Using the Work of a Specialist ("SAS 73"). New York, NY: AICPA.
5. -. 1994b. Report to the Public Oversight Board of the SEC Practice Section, AICPA from the Advisory Panel on Auditor Independence (the "Kirk Committee"). Strengthening the Professionalism of the Independent Auditor. New York, NY: AICPA.
6. -. 1996. Official Releases: AICPA Ruling No. 103 of Rule of Conduct 101. Member Providing Attest Report on Internal Controls. Journal of Accountancy (August): 110.
7. Barr, S. 1995. Farming out internal audits. CFO Magazine (June): 69-72.
8. Big 6 Firms. 1991. The public accounting profession: Meeting the needs of a changing world.
9. Briloff, A. 1987. Do management services endanger independence and objectivity? The CPA Journal (August): 22-29.
10. Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities. 1978. Report, Conclusions and Recommendations. New York, NY.
11. Elliott, R. 1992. Audit independence: Concept and application. The CPA Journal (March): 34-39.
12. Hock, S. 1996. The 1996 top 100 firms. Accounting Today (March 18-April 7): 12-23.
13. Lea, R. 1996. Opportunities for assurance services in the 21st century: A progress report of the special committee on assurance services. Presented at the University of Kansas Audit Symposium, May.
14. Lowe, D., and K. Pany. 1995. CPA performance of consulting engagements with audit clients: Effects on financial statement users' perceptions and decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 35-53.
15. Mednick, R., and G. J. Previts. 1987. The scope of CPA services: A view of the future from the perspective of a century of progress. Journal of Accountancy (May): 220-227.
16. National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. 1987. Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (the "Treadway Commission"). New York, NY.
17. Norris, F. 1996. Auditors: Experts or just robots? The New York Times (August 4): C1.
18. U.S. v. Arthur Young, 104 S.Ct. 1495 (1984).
19. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 1978. Accounting Series Release No. 250.
20. -. 1979. Accounting Series Release No. 264.
21. -. 1981a. Accounting Series Release No. 296.
22. -. 1981b. Accounting Series Release No. 297.
23. -. 1994a. SEC Codification of Financial Reporting Policies.
24. -. 1994b. SEC Staff Report on Auditor Independence (March).
25. Wallman, S. 1995. The future of accounting and disclosure in an evolving world: The need for dramatic change. Accounting Horizons (September): 81-91.
26. -. 1996. The future of accounting and financial reporting part II: The colonized approach. Accounting Horizons (June): 138-148.
27. Wall Street Journal. 1996. Andersen flap could presage formal split (July 29): B1.