Some Multivariate Displays for NAEP Results

Psychological Methods

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 34-63

  Wainer, Howard ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002595466     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.1.34     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andrews, D. F. (1972). Plots of high-dimensional data. Biometrics, 28, 125-136.
2. Bamett, V. (Ed.) (1981). Interpreting multivariate data. New York: Wiley.
3. Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics (W. Berg & H. Wainer, Trans.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. (Original work published in 1973)
4. Chernoff, H. (1973). The use of faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 361-368.
5. Chernoff, H., & Rizvi, H. M. (1975). Effect on classification error of random permutations of features in representing multivariate data by faces. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 548-554.
6. Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
7. Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, M. E. (Eds.) (1988). Dynamic graphics for statistics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8. Donoho, A. W., Donoho, D. L., & Gasko, M. (1986). MACSPIN: A tool for dynamic display of multivariate data. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; and Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9. Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1977). Rudiments of numeracy. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 140, 277-297.
10. Flury, B., & Riedwyl, H. (1981). Graphical representations of multivariate data by means of asymmetrical faces. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 757-765.
11. Friedman, J., Tukey, J. W., & Tukey, P. A. (1980). Approaches to analysis of data that concentrate near higher-dimensional manifolds. In E. Diday, L. Lebart, J. T. Pagès, & P. Tomassone (Eds.), Data Analysis and Informatics (pp. 3-13). Amsterdam and New York: North Holland.
12. Friendly, M. F. (1993). Mosaic displays for multi-way contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 190-200.
13. Friendly, M. F. (1995). Conceptual and visual models for categorical data. The American Statistician, 49, 153-160.
14. Gruvaeus, G. T., & Wainer, H. (1972). Two additions to hierarchical cluster analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 200-206.
15. Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
16. Jacob, R. J. K., Egeth, H. E., & Bevan, W. (1976). The face as a data display. Human Factors, 18, 189-200.
17. Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32, 241-254.
18. Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. (1977). The advanced theory of statistics (Vol. 1). London: Charles Griffin.
19. Kleiner, B., & Hartigan, J. (1981). Representing points in many dimensions by trees and castles. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 260-268.
20. Kruskal, W. H. (1975). Visions of maps and graphs. In Auto Carto II: Proceedings of the International Symposium Computer-Assisted Cartography (pp. 27-36). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
21. Li, G. (1985). Robust regression. In D. C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & J. W. Tukey (Eds.), Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes (pp. 291-343). New York: Wiley.
22. Mullis, I. V. S., Dossey, J. A., Owen, E. H., & Phillips, G. W. (1991). The State of Mathematics Achievement, NAEP's 1990 Assessment of the Nation and the Trial Assessment of the States. Report No. 21-ST-04. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
23. Mullis, I. V. S., Dossey, J. A., Owen, E. H. & Phillips, G. W. (1993). NAEP 1992: Mathematics Report Card for the Nation and the States. Report No. 23-ST02. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
24. Nightingale, F. (1858). Notes on matters affecting the health, efficiency and hospital administration of the British Army. London: Author.
25. Ramsay, J. O. (1980, June). Inside-out displays and more. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA.
26. Rogers, A. (1995). NAEPEX: NAEP data extraction program user guide. Princeton. NJ: Educational Testing Service.
27. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
28. Rousseuw, P. J., & Croux, C. (1993). Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1273-1283.
29. Rousseuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (1987). Robust regression and outlier detection. New York: Wiley.
30. Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1986). XTREE: A multivariate graphical icon applicable in the evaluation of statistical estimators. The American Statistician, 40, 149-153.
31. Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
32. Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
33. Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual explanations. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
34. Von Mayr, G. (1874). Gutachten über die Anwendung der graphischen and geographischen Methods in der Statistik. Munich, Germany: Author.
35. Wainer, H. (1976). Robust statistics: A survey and some prescriptions. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 285-312.
36. Wainer, H. (1993). Tabular presentation. Chance, 6(3), 52-56.
37. Wainer, H. (1995a). A rose by another name. Chance, 8(2), 46-51.
38. Wainer, H. (1995b). Trilinear plots. Chance, 8(1), 48-54.
39. Wainer, H. (1997). Improving tabular displays: With NAEP tables as examples and inspirations. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 1-32.
40. Wainer, H. (1996). Using trilinear plots for NAEP data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 41-55.
41. Wainer, H., & Schacht, S. (1978). Gapping. Psychometrika, 43, 203-212.
42. Wainer, H., & Thissen, D. (1993). Graphical data analysis. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Statistical issues (pp. 391-457). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Wakimoto, K. (1977). A trial of a modification of the face graph proposed by Chernoff: The body graph. Quantitative Behavioral Science (Kodo Keiryogaku), 4, 67-73.
44. Walker, H. M., & Durost, W. N. (1936). Statistical tables: Their structure and use. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications.