Assessment of Preservice Teachers and the Use of Portfolios

Theory Into Practice

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1993, Pages 75-81

  Ryan, Joseph M ^a   Kuhs, Therese M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002536958     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: 15430421     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00405849309543578     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrews, T.E., & Barnes, S. (1990). Assessment of teaching. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Educators (pp. 569–598). New York: Macmillan.
2. Arter, J.A., & Spandel, V.A. (1992, Spring). An NCME instructional module on using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 11, 36–44.
3. Borich, G.D. (1977). The appraisal of teaching: Concepts and process. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
4. Carlson, W.S. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: A pragmatic perspective. In J. Bro- phy (Ed.), Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice (pp. 115–143). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Dewey, J. (1965). The relation of theory to practice in education. Reprinted in M.L. Borrowman (Ed.), Teacher education in America: A documentary his- tory (pp. 140–171). New York: Teachers College Press. (Original work published 1904)
6. Education Commission on the States. (1983). A summary of major reports on education. Denver: Author.
7. Grossman, P.L., Wilson, S.M., & Shulman, L.S. (1989). Teacher of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M.C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23–36). New York: Pergamon Press.
8. The Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of The Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
9. Kagan, D.M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 129–169.
10. Katz, L.G., & Raths, J.D. (1986). Dispositions as goals for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 301–307.
11. Kennedy, M. (1987). Inexact sciences: Teacher education and learning to teach (Issue paper 77–2). East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
12. Mertens, D.M. (1989). Creative ideas for teaching evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1991). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
14. National Council for the Social Studies. (1988). Standards for the preparation of social studies teachers. Social Education, 52, 10–12.
15. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
16. National Science Teachers Association. (1987). Criteria for excellence. Washington, DC: Author.
17. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Paulson, F.L., Paulson, P.R., & Meyer, C.A. (1991, February). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48, 60–63.
19. Peterson, P.L. (1988, April). Teachers’ and students’ cognitional knowledge for classroom teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 5–14.
20. Reynolds, M.C. (Ed.). (1989). Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. New York: Pergamon Press.
21. Seldin, P. (1991). The teaching portfolio. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
22. Shavelson, R.J. (1983). Review of research on teachers’ pedagogical judgments, plans, and decisions. Elementary School Journal, 83, 392–413.
23. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
24. Stodolsky, S.S. (1984). Teacher evaluation: The limits of looking. Educational Researcher, 13(9), 11–18.
25. Zumwalt, K. (1989). Beginning professional teachers: The need for a curriculum vision of teaching. In M.C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23–36). New York: Pergamon Press.