Rotational effects in low energy dissociative recombination of diatomic ions

European Physical Journal D

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 71-78

  Valcu B ^a   Schneider, I F ^b,c   Raoult, M ^d   Stromholm C ^b   Larsson, M ^e   Suzor Weiner, A ^d,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LASER   (Romania)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^e STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISSOCIATION;

DIATOMIC MOLECULES; DIATOMICS; DISSOCIATIVE RECOMBINATIONS; LIGHT MOLECULES; LOWER ENERGIES; MOLECULAR IONS; PROCESS-BASED; RECOMBINATION PROCESS; ROTATIONAL EFFECTS; ROTATIONAL INTERACTIONS;

MOLECULES;

EID: 0002531760     PISSN: 14346060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100530050065     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. P. Fork, M. Grieser, D. Habs, A. Lampert, R. Repnow, D. Schwalm, A. Wolf, D. Zajfman, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Rev. B 79, 273 (1993).
2. M. Larsson, Phys. World 9, 40 (1996);
3. M. Larsson, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48, 145 (1997).
4. A.E. Orel, K.C. Kulander, T.N. Rescigno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4807 (1995).
5. B.K. Sarpal, J. Tennyson, L.A. Morgan, J. Phys. B 27, 5943 (1994).
6. S.L. Guberman, Phys. Rev. A 49, R4277 (1994).
7. S.L. Guberman, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 1699 (1995).
8. C. Strömholm, I.F. Schneider, G. Sundström, L. Carata, H. Danared, S. Datz, O. Dulieu, A. Källberg, M. af Uglas, X. Urbain, V. Zengin, A. Suzor-Weiner, M. Larsson, Phys. Rev. A 52, R4320 (1995).
9. I.F. Schneider, O. Dulieu, A. Giusti-Suzor, E. Roueff, Astrophys. J. 424, 983 (1994).
10. H. Takagi, J. Phys. B 26, 4815 (1993).
11. G.V. Golubkov, M.G. Golubkov, G.K. Ivanov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 108 105 (1995);
12. Engl. Transl. Sov. Phys.-JETP 81, 56 (1995).
13. T. Tanabe, I. Katayama, N. Inoue, K. Chida, Y. Arakaki, T. Watanabe, M. Yoshisawa, S. Ohtani, K. Noda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1066 (1995).
14. I.F. Schneider, C. Strömholm, L. Carata, X. Urbain, M. Larsson, A. Suzor-Weiner, J Phys. B 30, 2687 (1997).
15. J.N. Bardsley, J. Phys. B 1, 365 (1968).
16. A. Giusti, J. Phys. B 13, 3687 (1980).
17. U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
18. U. Fano, Phys. Rev. A 2, 353 (1970) .
19. E.S. Chang, U. Fano, Phys. Rev. A 6, 173 (1972) .
20. S.L. Guberman, A. Giusti-Suzor, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 2602 (1991).
21. M.J. Seaton, Rep. Prog. Phys. 46, 167 (1983) .
22. L. Wolniewicz, K. Dressler, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 3292 (1985).
23. L.A. Collins, B. Schneider, D.L. Lynch, C.J. Noble, Phys. Rev. A 52, 1310 (1995).
24. J. Tennyson, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 64, 253 (1996).
25. C. Strömholm, H. Danared, A. Larsson, M. Larsson, C. Marian, S. Rosen, B. Schimmelpfennig, I.F. Schneider, J. Semaniak, A. Suzor-Weiner, U. Wahlgren, Van der Zande, J. Phys. B (in press 1997).
26. D. Hirst, M. Guest, Molecular Physic 49, 1461-1469 (1983) .
27. E. Miescher, Can. J. Phys. 54, 2074 (1976).
28. A. Giusti-Suzor, Ch. Jungen, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 986 (1984).
29. M. Raoult, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 4736 (1987) .
30. H. Sun, H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 6491 (1990) .
31. K.P. Huber, G. Herzberg, in Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure IV (Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1979).
32. The difference between the rate coefficients for direct (dashed line) and total (dotted line) processes in Fig. 9c may seem large when compared to the resonance structure in Fig. 9b above. This is due to the different scales between the two figures, and also to the logarithmic scales which make the resonances look almost symmetric in Fig. 9b while actually their positive parts are much larger than the dip ones and lead to an appreciable increase of the rate after Maxwell averaging.