Mapping the terrain of pharmacy: Co-classification analysis of the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts database

Scientometrics

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 77-97

  Spasser, M A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002486863     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02457431     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, Cartography of Science: Scientometric Mapping with Multidimensional Scaling Methods. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Pr., 1992.
2. For early treatments of the possibilities of mapping information or knowledge spaces, see D. J. DE SOLLA PRICE, Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963, and D. J. DE SOLLA PRICE, The revolution in mapping of science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 16 (1979) 249-253.
3. For early treatments of the possibilities of mapping information or knowledge spaces, see D. J. DE SOLLA PRICE, Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963, and D. J. DE SOLLA PRICE, The revolution in mapping of science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 16 (1979) 249-253.
4. See, inter alia, L. LEYDESDORFF, The development of frames of reference. Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 103-125.
5. For example, K. W. MCCAIN, Mapping economics through the journal literature: an experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (1991) 290-296.
6. Document co-citation was co-discovered independently by: H. G. SMALL, Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 265-269, and I. V. MARSHAKOVA, A system of document links constructed on the basis of citation. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 7 (1973) 49-57.
7. Document co-citation was co-discovered independently by: H. G. SMALL, Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 265-269, and I. V. MARSHAKOVA, A system of document links constructed on the basis of citation. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 7 (1973) 49-57.
8. Author co-citation analysis was introduced by H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 163-172. See also K. W. MCCAIN, Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (1990) 433-443.
9. Author co-citation analysis was introduced by H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 163-172. See also K. W. MCCAIN, Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (1990) 433-443.
10. See M. CALLON, J. LAW, A. RIP, Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan, 1986, for a book-length treatment of co-word analysis in the context of, and as analytic tool for, actor-network theory.
11. For example, R. R. BRAAM, H. F. MOED, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Mapping of science by combining co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Science of Information Science, 42 (1991) 233-251, and R. R. BRAAM, H. F. MOED, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Mapping of science by combining co-citation and word analysis. II. Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Science of Information Science, 42 (1991) 252-266.
12. For example, R. R. BRAAM, H. F. MOED, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Mapping of science by combining co- citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Science of Information Science, 42 (1991) 233-251, and R. R. BRAAM, H. F. MOED, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Mapping of science by combining co-citation and word analysis. II. Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Science of Information Science, 42 (1991) 252-266.
13. K. W. MCCAIN, The structure of biotechnology research-and-development (R&D). Scientometrics, 32 (1995) 153-175, and K. W. MCCAIN, Biotechnology in context: a database-filtering approach to identifying core and productive non-core journals supporting multidisciplinary R&D. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (1995) 306-317.
14. K. W. MCCAIN, The structure of biotechnology research-and-development (R&D). Scientometrics, 32 (1995) 153-175, and K. W. MCCAIN, Biotechnology in context: a database-filtering approach to identifying core and productive non-core journals supporting multidisciplinary R&D. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (1995) 306-317.
15. R. TODOROV, Co-classification analysis for science mapping: an example from superconductivity, in: A. F. J. VAN RAAN, A. J. NEDERHOF, H. F. MOED, (Eds), Science and Technology Indicators, Leiden: DSWO Pr., University of Leiden, 1989, p. 263-270.
16. J. WHITTAKER, Creativity and conformity in science: titles, keywords, and co-word analysis. Social Studies of Science, 19 (1989) 473-496.
17. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, Op. cit., Ref. 1, p. 35.
18. R. TODOROV, Representing a scientific field: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 593-605.
19. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, Op. cit., Ref. 1, p. 44.
20. J. KRUSKAL, The relationship between multidimensional scaling and clustering, in: Classification and Clustering, J. VAN RYZIN, (Ed.), New York: Academic Pr., 1977, p. 17-44.
21. S. S. SCHIFFMAN, M. L. REYNOLDS, F. W. YOUNG, Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Academic Pr., 1981.
22. M. S. ALDENDERFER, R. K. BLASHFIELD, Cluster Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1984.
23. M. R. ANDERBERG, Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York: Academic Pr., 1973.
24. J. KRUSKAL, Op. cit., Ref. 15.
25. P. H. A. SNEATH, R. R. SOKAL, Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1973.
26. D. L. FISHMAN, V. L. STONE, B. A. DIPAULA, Where should the pharmacy look first? comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 84 (1996) 402-408.
27. rd ed.). Bethesda, MD: American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1989, p. 1-2.
28. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HOSPITAL PHARMACISTS, Op. cit., Ref. 22, p. 2.
29. See D. C. RITCHEY, M. MILLARES, D. L. KAWAGUCHI, Online database searching: the world of drug information at your fingertips. California Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 6 (1994) 6-10, and B. SNOW, Online retrieval of pharmaceutical information. Drexel Library Quarterly, 18 (1982) 64-83.
30. See D. C. RITCHEY, M. MILLARES, D. L. KAWAGUCHI, Online database searching: the world of drug information at your fingertips. California Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 6 (1994) 6-10, and B. SNOW, Online retrieval of pharmaceutical information. Drexel Library Quarterly, 18 (1982) 64-83.
31. See K. W. KRUSE, Online searching of the pharmaceutical literature. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 40 (1983) 240-253, and FISHMAN et al., Op cit., Ref. 21.
32. See K. W. KRUSE, Online searching of the pharmaceutical literature. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 40 (1983) 240-253, and FISHMAN et al., Op cit., Ref. 21.
33. See D. R. TOUSIGNAUT, Searching "pharmacy" databases: nomenclature problems and inconsistencies. Database, 5 (1982) 23-29.
34. See H. BOXENBAUM, Scientific commentary: literature growth in pharmacokinetics. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 10 (1982) 335-348.
35. See R. J. CLUXTON, JR., R. H. HUNTER, R. C. REED, Comparison of five information services as sources of bioavailability data. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 36 (1979) 1215-1218.
36. B. SNOW, Op. cit., Ref. 24.
37. W. A. ZELLMER, IPA: vital resource for pharmacy practice [editorial]. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 45 (1988) 2327.
38. Suggested by a conversation with K. W. MCCAIN, November 1996.
39. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HOSPITAL PHARMACISTS, Op. cit., Ref. 22, p. 3.
40. FISHMAN et al., Op. cit., Ref. 21.
41. C. BEGHTOL, Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: the case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (1995) 30-44.
42. International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, 7 (1970) 31-32.
43. CAROLE PALMER, personal communication, December 1996.
44. K. W. MCCAIN, Op. cit., Ref. 6.
45. H. D. WHITE, Cocited author retrieval. Information Technology & Libraries, 5 (1986) 93-99.
46. P. H. A. SNEATH, R. R. SOKAL, Op. cit., Ref. 20,
47. and K. W. MCCAIN, Op. cit., Ref. 9.
48. K. W. MCCAIN, Op. cit., Ref. 6.
49. M. J. NORUSIS, SPSS: Professional Statistics 6.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc., 1994.
50. H. D. WHITE, K. W. MCCAIN, Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24 (1989) 119-186.
51. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HOSPITAL PHARMACISTS, Op. Cit., Ref. 22.
52. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, Op. cit., Ref. 1, but see also H. C. ROMESBURG, Cluster Analysis for Researchers. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Pub. Co., 1990, for a dissenting view of the appropriateness of testing cluster solutions for statistical significance.
53. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, Op. cit., Ref. 1, but see also H. C. ROMESBURG, Cluster Analysis for Researchers. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Pub. Co., 1990, for a dissenting view of the appropriateness of testing cluster solutions for statistical significance.
54. R. TODOROV, Op cit., Ref. 10.
55. S. HINZE, Bibliographical cartography of an emerging interdisciplinary discipline: the case of bioelectronics. Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 353-376.
56. P. ARABIE, J. D. CARROLL, W. S. DESARBO, Three-Way Scaling and Clustering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1987.
57. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, Op. cit., Ref. 1, p. 20.