Structure and motion from two uncalibrated views using points on planes

Proceedings of International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 3DIM

Volumn 2001-January, Issue , 2001, Pages 83-90

  Bartoli, A ^a   Sturm, P ^a   Horaud, R ^a  

^a INRIA RHÔNE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Buildings; Cameras; Computer vision; Europe; Geometry; Image reconstruction; Layout; Maximum likelihood estimation; Motion estimation; Transmission line matrix methods

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; CAMERAS; COMPUTER VISION; GEOMETRY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAINTENANCE; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; MOTION ESTIMATION;

ESTIMATION PROBLEM; EUROPE; LAYOUT; POINT CORRESPONDENCE; REPROJECTION ERROR; STRUCTURE AND MOTIONS; STRUCTURE RECOVERY; TRANSMISSION LINE MATRIX METHODS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

EID: 0002399643     PISSN: 15506185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IM.2001.924410     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. A. Bartoli, P. Sturm, and R. Horaud. A projective framework for structure and motion recovery from two views of a piecewise planar scene. Research Report 4070, INRIA, Grenoble, France, October 2000.
2. S. Bougnoux. From projective to euclidean space under any practical situation, a criticism of self-calibration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 790-796, 1998.
3. O. Faugeras and F. Lustman. Motion and structure from motion in a piecewise planar environment. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2(3):485-508, September 1988.
4. M.A. Fischler and R.C. Bolles. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Graphics and Image Processing, 24(6):381-395, 1981.
5. R.I. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, June 2000.
6. K. Kanatani. Geometric information criterion for model selection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 26(3):171-189, 1998.
7. Q.T. Luong. Matrice fondamentale et autocalibration en vision par ordinateur. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay, France, December 1992.
8. Q.T. Luong and O.D. Faugeras. Determining the fundamental matrix with planes: Instability and new algorithms. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1993.
9. Q.T. Luong and T. Vieville. Canonic representations for the geometries of multiple projective views. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 64(2):193-229, 1996.
10. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes in C - The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
11. R. Szeliski and P.H.S. Torr. Geometrically constrained structure from motion : Points on planes. In 3D Structure from Multiple Images of Large-scale Environments SMILE. 1998.
12. J.-P. Tarel and J.-M. Vézien. A generic approach for planar patches stereo reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, pages 1061-1070, 1995.
13. P.H.S. Torr. An assessment of information criteria for motion model selection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 47-52, 1997.
14. B. Triggs. Optimal estimation of matching constraints. In 3D Structure from Multiple Images of Large-scale Environments SMILE. 1998.
15. T. Viéville and D. Lingrand. Using singular displacements for uncalibrated monocular visual systems. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 207-216. 1996.
16. G. Xu, J.-I. Terai, and H.-Y. Shum. A linear algorithm for camera self-calibration, motion and structure recovery for multi-planar scenes from two perspective images. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2000.
17. Z. Zhang. Determining the epipolar geometry and its uncertainty: A review. International Journal of Computer Vision, 27(2):161-195, 1998.