Comparing cognitive representations of test developers and students on a mathematics test with bloom's taxonomy

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 26-32

  Gierl, Mark J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002398487     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220679709597517     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Birenbaum, M., Kelly, A. E., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (1991). Diagnosing knowledge states in algebra using the rule-spaee model. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24. 442-459.
2. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). A taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook/Cognitive Domain. New York; David McKay.
3. Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement (4th. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Embretson, S. E. (1985). Introduction for the problem of test design. In S. E. Embretson (15d.), Test design: Developments in psychology and psychometrics (pp. 3-17). New York: Academic Press.
5. Emmerich, W. (1989). Appraising the cognitive features of subject tests (Research Rep. No. RR-89-53). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6. Ericcson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
7. Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data (2nd ed.). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
8. Frederiksen, N., Glaser, R. L., Lesgold, A. M., & Shafto, M. G. (1990). Diagnostic monitoring of skills and knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Frederiksen, N., Mislevy, R. J., Bejar, I. I. (1993). Test theory for a new generation of tests. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gronlund, N. E. (1991). How to write and use educational objectives (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
11. Kennedy, J. J., & Tam, E. P. (1994). Log-linear models. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 3499-3508). New York: Pergamon.
12. Millman, J., & Greene, J. (1989). The specification and development of tests of achievement and ability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 335-366). New York: American Council of Education: Macmillan.
13. Nichols, P. (1994). A framework of developing cognitively diagnostic assessments. Review of Educational Research, 64, 575-603.
14. Nichols, P. D., Chipman, S. F., Brennan, R. L. (1995). Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Osterlind, S. J. (1989). Constructing test items. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
16. Smith, F. M. (1984). Constructing and using achievement tests in the classroom: A competency based text. New York: Peter Lang.
17. Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 263-331). New York: American Council of Education: Macmillan.
18. Snow, R. E. & Peterson, P. L. (1985). Cognitive analyses of tests: Implications for redesign. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.), Test design: Developments in psychology and psychometrics (pp. 149-166). New York: Academic Press.
19. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1993), Item construction and psychometric models appropriate for constructed responses. In R. E. Bennett & W. C. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp. 107-134). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1995), Architecture of knowledge structures and cognitive diagnosis: A statistical pattern recognition and classification approach. In P. D. Nichols, S. F. Chipman, & R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp. 327-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.