A Shape Decomposition Technique in Electrical Impedance Tomography

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 155, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 75-95

  Han, David K ^a   Prosperetti, Andrea ^b,c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Electrical impedance tomography; Image compression; Inverse problems

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; IMAGE COMPRESSION; ITERATIVE METHODS; SAILING VESSELS;

CONDUCTING OBJECTS; DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUE; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL IMPE DANCE TOMOGRAPHY (EIT); EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES; FOURIER COEFFICIENTS; IMAGES COMPRESSION; ITERATIVE TECHNIQUE; SHAPE DECOMPOSITION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL DOMAIN;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 0002347868     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6330     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ceccio S. L., George D. L. A review of electrical impedance techniques for the measurement of multiphase flows. J. Fluids Eng. 118:1996;391.
2. D. Mewes, and, D. Schmitz, Tomographic methods for the analysis of flow patterns in steady and transient flows, in, Two-Phase Flow Modelling and Experimentation, edited by, G. P. Celata, P. Di Marco, and R. K. Shah, Edizioni ETS, Pisa, 1999, p, 29.
3. H. N. Og̃uz, and, D. Han, 3-D impedance tomography of high contrast objects, in, Boundary Elements XX, edited by, A. Cassab, M. Chopra, and C. A. Brebbia, Computational Mechanics, Southhampton, 1998, p, 361.
4. Barber C. C., Brown B. H. Imaging spatial distributions of resistivity using applied potential tomography. Electron. Lett. 19:1983;933.
5. Barber C. C., Brown B. H. Applied potential tomography. J. Phys. E. 17:1984;723.
6. Santosa F., Vogelius M. A backprojection algorithm for electrical impedance imaging. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50:1990;216.
7. Guardo R., Boulay C., Murray B., Bertrand M. An experimental study in electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38:1991;617.
8. Yorkey T. J., Webster J. G., Tompkins W. J. Comparing reconstruction methods for electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 11:1987;843.
9. Dickin F. J., Williams R. A., Beck M. S. Determination of composition and motion of multicomponent mixtures in process vessels using electrical impedance tomography. I. Principles and process engineering applications. Chem. Eng. Sci. 48:1993;1883.
10. D. L. George, S. L. Ceccio, J. R. Torczynski, K. A. Shollenberger, and, T. J. O'Hern, Validation of electrical impedance tomography for measurement of material distribution in two-phase flows, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, in press.
11. Reinecke N., Mewes D. Multielectrode capacitance sensors for the visualization of transient two-phase flows. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 15:1997;253.
12. Jaswon M. A., Symm G. T. Integral Equation Methods in Potential Theory and Elastostatics. 1977.
13. Pozrikidis C. Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow. 1992.
14. Press W. H., Vetterling W. T., Teukolsky S. A., Flannery B. P. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN. 1992.
15. Cheng K., Isaacson D., Newell J. C., Gisser D. G. Electrode models for electric current computed tomography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:1989;918.
16. Paulson K., Breckon W., Pidcock M. Electrode modeling in electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52:1992;1012.
17. Murai M., Kagawa Y. Electrical impedance computed tomography based on a finite element model. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 32:1985;177.
18. Murai M., Kagawa Y. Boundary element iterative technique for determining the interface boundary between two Laplace domains - A basic study of impedance plethysmography as an inverse problem. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 23:1986;35.
19. O. C. Jones, J. T. Lin, H. Shu, L. Ovacik, and, Y. He, Impedance imaging relative to binary mixtures, in, Liquid-Solid Flows, edited by, M. C. Roco, C. T. Crowe, D. D. Joseph, and E. E. Michaelides, ASME, New York, 1994, Vol, FED-189, p, 91.
20. Duraiswami R., Chahine G. L., Sarkar K. Efficient 2D and 3D electrical impedance tomography using boundary element methods. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52:1997;2185.