Fregean innocence

Mind and Language

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 338-370

  Pietroski, Paul M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002316687     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00051.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Burge, T. 1974: Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth. Journal of Philosophy, 71, 205-73.
2. Burge, T. 1979: Frege and the Hierarchy. Synthese, 40, 265-81.
3. Burge, T. 1986: Sinning Against Frege. Philosophical Review, 88, 398-432.
4. Burge, T. 1990: Frege on Sense and Linguistic Meaning. In D. Bell and N. Cooper (eds.), The Analytic Tradition. Cambridge: Blackwell.
5. Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. forthcoming: Varieties of Quotation. Mind.
6. Church, A. 1951: A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation. In Henle et al. (eds.), Structure, Method, and Meaning. New York: Liberal Arts Press.
7. Davidson, D. 1967: The Logical Form of Action Sentences. In N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
8. Davidson, D. 1968: On Saying That. Synthese. 19, 130-46.
9. Dummett, M. 1973: Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.
10. Dwyer, S. and Pietroski, P. 1996: Believing in Language. Philosophy of Science, 63, 338-73.
11. Etchemendy, J. 1990: The Concept of Logical Consequence. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
12. Evans, G. 1982: The Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
13. Forbes, G. 1989: Indexicals and Intensionality. Philosophical Review, 96, 3-31.
14. Forbes, G. 1990: The Indispensability of Sinn. Philosophical Review, 99, 535-63.
15. Frege, G. 1892: Sense and Reference. In P. Geach and M. Black (trans.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (1980). Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Higginbotham, J. 1986: Davidson's Program in Semantics. In E. LePore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Higginbotham, J. 1991: Belief and Logical Form. Mind and Language, 6, 344-69.
18. Kaplan, D. 1989: Demonstratives. In J. Almog et al. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press.
19. Kripke, S. 1979: A Puzzle about Belief. In A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use. Dordrecht: Reidel.
20. Larson, R. and Ludlow, P. 1993: Interpreted Logical Forms. Synthese, 95, 305-55.
21. Ludlow, P. 1996: The Adicity of 'Believes' and the Hidden Indexical Theory. Analysis, 56, 97-101.
22. Mates, B. 1950: Synonymity. In L. Linsky (ed.), Semantics and the Philosophy of Language (1952). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
23. Munro, P. 1982: On the Transitivity of 'Say' Verbs. Syntax and Semantics, 15, 301-18.
24. Owens, J. 1995: Pierre and the Fundamental Assumption. Mind and Language, 10, 250-73.
25. Parsons, T. 1981: Frege's Hierarchies of Indirect Senses and the Paradox of Analysis. 49n P. French et al. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume 6. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26. Quine, W. 1953: Reference and Modality. In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
27. Schiffer, S. 1992: Belief Ascription, Journal of Philosophy, 89, 499-521.
28. Segal, G. 1989: A Preference for Sense and Reference. Journal of Philosophy, 89, 73-89.
29. Seymour, M. 1994: Indirect Discourse and Quotation. Philosophical Studies, 74, 1-38.
30. Soames, S. 1987a: Direct Reference, Prepositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content. Philosophical Topics, 15, 47-87.
31. Soames, S. 1987b: Substitutivity. In J. Thomson (ed.), On Being and Saying. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.