Recycling cotext: The impact of prior conversation on the emergence of episodes in a multiparty radio talk show

Discourse Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 99-125

  Korolija, Natascha ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002312089     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638539809545022     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1992). Topic transitions in physician-patient interviews: Power, gender, and discourse change. Language in Society, 21, 409-426.
2. Anderson, F. G. (1995). Forms and functions of repetitions in discourse. In S. Miller & J. Mey (Eds.), Form and function in language (pp. 117-135). Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press.
3. Auer, P. (1992). Introduction: John Gumperz' approach to contextualization. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 1-37). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Bar-Hillel, Y. (Ed.). (1971). Pragmatics of natural languages. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
5. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bublitz, W. (1988). Supportive fellow-speakers and cooperative conversations. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
7. Bublitz, W. (1992). Parallelism in advertising copy. In D. Stein (Ed.), Cooperating with written texts: The pragmatics and comprehension of written texts (pp. 437-458). Berlin, Germany: Mouton.
8. Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. Tesol Quarterly, 16, 479-488.
9. Catford, J. C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
10. Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21-51). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Chiaro, D. (1992). The language of jokes: Analyzing verbal play. London: Routledge.
13. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Crow, B. K. (1983). Topic shifts in couples' conversations. In R. T. Craig & K. Tracy (Eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure and strategy (pp. 136-156). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Dascal, M. (1981). Contextualism. In H. Parret, M. Sbisà, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, July 8-14, 1979 (pp. 153-177). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
16. Dascal, M. (1989). Controversies as quasi-dialogues. In E. Weigand & F. Hundsnurscher (Eds.), Dialoganalyse II: Referate der 2. Arbeitstagung, Bochum 1988 (pp. 147-159). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
17. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
18. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code and context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
21. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23. Goodwin, C. (1986). Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text, 6, 283-316.
24. Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1-42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
26. Gumperz, J., & Tannen, D. (1979). Individual and social differences in language use. In C. Fillmore (Ed.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 305-325). New York: Academic.
27. Hakala, C. M., & O'Brien, E. J. (1995). Strategies for resolving coherence breaks in reading. Discourse Processes, 20, 167-185.
28. Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics (pp. 140-165). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
29. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
30. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
31. Hutchby, I. (1995). Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes, 19, 219-238.
32. Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 171-183.
33. Karttunen, L. (1974). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1, 181-194.
34. Korolija, N. (1997). Talk for talk's sake: On routine construction of coherence in multiparty phatic conversation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35. Korolija, N., & Linell, P. (1996). Episodes: Coding and analyzing coherence in multiparty conversation. Linguistics, 34, 799-831.
36. Kothoff, H. (1997). Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia Linguistica, 3-4.
37. Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1993). Meaning effects of context. Discourse Processes, 16, 429-449.
38. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic.
39. Lampert, M., & Ervin-Tripp, S. (1993). Structured coding for the study of language and social interaction. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 169-206). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. Levinson, S. C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17, 365-399.
41. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Lewis, D. (1972). General semantics. In D. Davidson & G. H. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 168-218). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
44. Linell, P. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics (Studies in Communication Rep. No. 2). Linköping, Sweden: University of Linköping, Department of Communication Studies.
45. Linell, P. (1995a). Dialogical analysis. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, & J. Blommaert (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 575-577). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
46. Linell, P. (1995b). The dynamics of contexts in discourse. In S. Millar & J. Mey (Eds.), Form and function in language (pp. 41-67). Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press.
47. Linell, P., & Korolija, N. (1995). On the division of communicative labour within episodes in aphasic discourse. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 11(2[31]), 143-165.
48. Linell, P., & Korolija, N. (1997). Coherence in multiparty conversation: Episodes and contexts in interaction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Conversation: Communicative, cognitive and cultural perspectives (pp. 167-205). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
49. Linell, P., & Marková, I. (1993). Acts in discourse: From monological speech acts to dialogical inter-acts. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23, 173-195.
50. Marková, I., & Foppa, K. (Eds.). (1990). The dynamics of dialogue. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
51. Maynard, D. (1980). Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotica, 30, 263-290.
52. Müller, K. (1992). Theatrical moments: On contextualizing funny and dramatic moods in the course of telling a story in conversation. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 205-221). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
53. Norrick, N. (1987). Functions of repetition in conversation. Text, 7, 245-264.
54. Ochs Keenan, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1976). Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 335-384). New York: Academic.
55. Oliver, R. T., & Cortright, R. L. (1970). Effective speech. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
56. Oltean, S. (1985). Reflections on the concept of text. Revue Romaine de Linguistique, 30, 321-326.
57. Parker, R. (1984). Conversational grouping and fragmentation: A preliminary investigation. Semiotica, 50, 43-68.
58. Parret, H. (1989). Paraphrase as coherence principle in conversation. In M.-E. Conte, J. S. Petöfi, & E. Sözer (Eds.), Text and discourse connectedness (pp. 281-289). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
59. Reichman, R. (1978). Conversational coherency. Cognitive Science, 3, 283-327.
60. Roberts, R. M., & Kieuz, R. J. (1993). Nonstandard discourse and its coherence. Discourse Processes, 16, 451-464.
61. Scannell, P. (Ed.). (1991). Broadcast talk. London: Sage.
62. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, & N. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 207-234). Berkeley: University of California Press.
63. Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of "coherence" in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 51-77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
64. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Tannen, D. (1987). Repetition in conversation as spontaneous formulaicity. Text. 7, 215-243.
66. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
67. van Dijk, T. (1982). Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1982 (pp. 177-195). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
68. Watson, J., & Potter, R. J. (1962). An analytic unit for the study of interaction. Human Relations, 15, 245-264.