Antievolution and creationism in the United States

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volumn 26, Issue , 1997, Pages 263-289

  Scott, Eugenie C ^a  

^a Natl Center for Science Education   (United States)

Author keywords

Creation evolution controversy; Evolution; Intelligent design; Religion; Science

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002297492     PISSN: 00846570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.263     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Almquist AJ, Cronin JE. 1988. Fact, fancy and myth on human evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 29(3):520-22
2. American Museum of Natural History. 1994. Science and Nature Survey. Off. Public Affairs, Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.
3. Anonymous. 1996. Surprise gift. No charge. Educ. Week, Apr. 3, p. 5
4. Behe M. 1996. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press
5. Bethell T. 1992. Darwin in the dock. Am. Spect., June, pp. 14, 16
6. Bible-Science Association. 1985. 1985 Bible-Sci. Assoc. Conf. Sched., Aug. 14-15, Cleveland, Ohio
7. Bird W. 1978. Freedom of religion and science indoctrination in public schools Yale Law J. 87:515-70
8. Bird W. 1987. The Supreme Court decision and its meaning. ICR Impact Ser. 170, Aug., 4 pp.
9. Brush SG. 1982. Finding the age of the earth by physics or by faith? J. Geol. Educ. 30: 34-58
10. Coyne JA. 1996. God in the details. Nature 383:227-28
11. Dalrymple GB. 1983. Can the earth be dated from decay of its magnetic field? J. Geol. Educ. 31:124-33
12. Davis P, Kenyon DH, eds. 1989. Of Pandas and People. Dallas, TX: Haughton. 170 pp.
13. Dawkins R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford. 224 pp.
14. Dawkins R. 1987. The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton
15. DeFord CS. 1991. (1931). A Reparation: Universal Gravitation a Universal Fake Fairfield, WA: Ye Galleon. 62 pp.
16. Edis T. 1994. Islamic creationism in Turkey. Creat./Evol. 34:1-12
17. Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987)
18. Eigen M. 1992. Steps Toward Life: A Perspective in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 173 pp.
19. Eiseley L. 1958. Darwin's Century. Garden City, NY: Anchor. 387 pp.
20. Eldredge N. 1982. The Monkey Business: A Scientist Looks at Creationism. New York: Washington Square (Pocket Books). 157 pp.
21. Eldredge N. 1989. Macroevolutionary Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill. 226 pp.
22. Eldredge N, Gould SJ. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism, Models in Paleobiology, ed. TJM Schopf, pp. 82-115. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper. 250 pp.
23. Ellis WE. 1983. Biology teachers and border state beliefs. Society Jan./Feb:26-30
24. Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97 (1967)
25. Eve R, Harrold FB. 1986. Creationism, cult archaeology and other pseudoscientific beliefs: a study of college students. Youth Soc. 4:396-421
26. Eve R, Harrold FB. 1991. The Creationist Movement in Modern America. Boston: Twayne. 234 pp.
27. Frye R. 1983. Is God a Creationist? The Religious Case Against Creation-Science. New York: Scribner's
28. Futuyma DJ. 1983. Science on Trial: The Case for Evolution. New York: Pantheon. 251 pp.
29. Gallup G Jr. 1982. The Gallup poll. The New York Times Aug. 29, p. 22
30. Gilkey L. 1985. Creationism on Trial: Evolutin and God at Little Rock. Minneapolis: Winston
31. Godfrey LR, ed. 1983. Scientists Confront Creationism. New York: Norton. 324 pp.
32. Godfrey LR, ed. 1985. What Darwin Began. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 312 pp.
33. Godfrey LR, Cole JR. 1995. A Century after Darwin: scientific creationism and academe. In Cult Archaeology and Creationism: Understanding Pseudoscientific Beliefs About the Past, ed. FB Harrold, RA Eve, pp. 99-123. Iowa City: Univ. Iowa Press. Expanded ed.
34. Goodman S. 1995. Creationists in Canada. Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. Rep. 15(1):10-11
35. Gould SJ. 1987. Creationism battle is over. Minneap. Star & Trib., July 19
36. Gould SJ. 1992. Impeaching a self-appointed judge. Sci. Am. July, pp. 118-21
37. Grabiner JV, Miller PD. 1974. Effects of the Scopes trial. Science 185(4154):832-37
38. Gross PR. 1996. The Dissent of man. Wall Street J., July, p. A11
39. Gross PR, Levitt N. 1994. Higher Superstition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press
40. Groves C. 1991. Creationism in Australia: Down but Not Out? Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. Rep. 11(2):21
41. Hartwig MD, Meyer SC. 1993. A note to teachers. See Davis & Kenyon 1989, pp. 153-61
42. Hull DL. 1991. The God of the Galapagos. Nature 352:485-86
43. John Paul II. 1996. Magisterium (Message to Pontifical Academy of Sciences) L'Osservatore romano, Oct. 30, p. 3, 7
44. Johnson P. 1990. A reply to my critics. In Evolution as Dogma, ed. PE Johnson, pp. 33-37. Found. Thought Ethics. Dallas: Haughton
45. Johnson P. 1993. Darwin on Trial, Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity. 220 pp. 2nd ed.
46. Johnson P. 1995. Reason in the Balance. Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity. 245 pp.
47. Jukes TH. 1984. The creationist challenge to science. Nature 308:398-400
48. Jukes TH. 1991. The persistent conflict. J. Mol. Evol. 33:205-6
49. Kauffman S. 1993. The Origin of Order. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
50. Kehoe A. 1983. The word of God. See Godfrey 1983, pp. 1-12
51. Kehoe A. 1985. Modern antievolutionism: the scientific creationists. See Godfrey 1983, pp. 165-85
52. Kennedy J. 1992. Teaching of creationism splits Louisville parents. The Repository, Sept. 30, p. B4
53. King JL, Jukes TH. 1969. Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164:788-98
54. Kitcher P. 1982. Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. Cambridge: MIT Press. 213 pp.
55. La Follette M, ed. 1982. Introduction: creation sciences and the law. Sci. Technol. Soc. 40:9-10
56. La Follette M, ed. 1983. Creationism, Science, and the Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
57. Larson EJ. 1985. Trial and Error: The American Controversy over Creation and Evolution. New York: Oxford. 222 pp.
58. Lewin R. 1981. A response to creationism evolves. Science 214:635-36
59. Matsumura MV. 1995a. Voices for Evolution. Berkeley, CA: Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. 176 pp.
60. Matsumura MV. 1995b. Tennessee upset: "Monkey bill" law defeated. Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. Rep. 15(4):6-7
61. Mayer W. 1982. Evolutionary theory vs. creationist doctrine. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 11(5): 270-76
62. McGown C. 1984. In the Beginning: A Scientist Shows Why the Creationists Are Wrong. Buffalo: Prometheus
63. McGrath AE. 1994. Christian Theology: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
64. McIver T. 1988a. Antievolution: An Annotated Bibliography. Jefferson, NC: McFarland
65. McIver T. 1988b. Christian reconstructionism, post-millennialism, and creationism. Creat./Evol. Newsl. 8(1):10-17
66. McLean v. Arkansas, 529 F. Suppl. 1255 (1982)
67. Miller KR. 1996. Darwin's black box. Rep. Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. 16(4):In press
68. Montagu A, ed. 1984. Science and Creationism. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. 415 pp.
69. Morris HR. N.d. Resolution for Equitable Treatment of Both Creation and Evolution. Inst. Creat. Res. Impact #26
70. Morris HR. 1963. The Twilight of Evolution. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House. 103 pp.
71. Morris HR. 1970. Biblical Cosmology and Modern Science. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed
72. Morrison D. 1982. Astronomy and creationism. Mercury Sept.-Oct., pp. 144-47
73. Moyer WA. 1981. Arguments for maintaining the integrity of science education. Am. Biol. Teach. 43(7):380-81
74. National Academy of Sciences. 1984. Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
75. National Center for Science Education. People for the American Way. 1990. Biology Textbooks 1990: The New Generation. Washington, DC: People Am. Way. 73 pp.
76. National Science Board. 1996. Science and Engineering Indicators - 1996, pp. 7-7-7-8. Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off., Natl. Sci. Board, pp. 96-21
77. Nelkin D. 1982. The Creation Controversy: Science or Scripture in the Schools. New York: Norton
78. Newell ND. 1982. Creation and Evolution: Myth or Reality? New York: Columbia Univ. Press
79. Numbers RL. 1982. Creationism in twentieth-century America. Science 218(4512): 538-44
80. Numbers RL. 1992. The Creationists. New York: Knopf. 458 pp.
81. Orlich DC, Ratcliff JL, Stronck DR. 1975. Creationism in the science classroom. Sci. Teach. 42(5):43-45
82. Orr HA. 1996. Darwin v. intelligent design (again). Boston Rev. 21(6):28-31
83. Paley W. 1803. Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. London: Faulder. 5th ed.
84. Peloza v. San Juan Capistrano Unif. Sch. Dist., 37 F. 3rd 517 (1994)
85. Provine W. 1988. Scientists, face it! Science and religion are incompatible Scientist 2:10
86. Ramm B. 1955. The Christian View of Science and Scripture. London: Paternoster
87. Ruse M. 1982. Darwinism defended: a guide to the evolution controversies. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
88. Ruse M. 1988. But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. 406 pp.
89. Ruvolo M. 1997. Genetic diversity in hominoid primates. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 26:515-40
90. Schadewald RJ. 1980. Earth orbits? moon landings? A Fraud! Says this prophet. Sci. Dig., July, pp. 58-63
91. Schadewald RJ. 1991. Introduction to Charles DeFord's Reparation. See DeFord 1991
92. Scott E. 1991. Creationism in New Zealand. Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. Rep. 11(2):20-21
93. Scott E. 1993. Review article: Darwin prosecuted. Creat./Evol. 33:42-47
94. Scott E. 1994. The Evolution of creationism: the struggle for the schools. Nat. Hist. 103: 10, 12-13
95. Scott E. 1995. State of Alabama distorts science, evolution. Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. Rep. 15(4):10-11
96. Scott E. 1996a. Creationism, ideology, and science. In The Flight From Science and Reason, ed. PR Gross, N Levitt, MW Lewis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 775:505-22
97. Scott E. 1996b. Close Ohio vote scuttles evidence against evolution bill. Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. Rep. 16(1):18
98. Scott E. 1997. Old earth moderates poised to spread design theory. Rep. Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. 17(1):25-26
99. Scott E, Cole HP. 1985. The elusive scientific basis of creation science. Q. Rev. Biol. 60(1):21-30
100. Scott E, Sager TC. 1992. Review article: Darwin on Trial, by Phillip Johnson. Creat./ Evol. 31:47-56
101. Shreeve J. 1996. Design for living. New York Times Mag., Aug. 4
102. Skoog G. 1979. The coverage of evolution in high school biology textbooks, 1900-1977. Sci. Educ. 63(5):621-40
103. Skoog G. 1984. The coverage of evolution in high school biology textbooks published in the 1980's. Sci. Educ. 68(2):117-28
104. Stanley SM. 1981. The New Evolutionary Timetable, Fossils, Genes, and the Origin of Species. New York: Basic Books. 222 pp.
105. Strahler AN. 1987. Science and Earth History: The Evolution/Creation Controversy. Buffao, NY: Prometheus
106. Torrance TF. 1981. Christian Theology and Scientific Culture. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
107. Tourney C. 1994. God's Own Scientists. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press. 289 pp.
108. Webster v. New Lennon Sch. Dist., 122, 917 F. 2nd 1004 (1990)
109. Weinberg S. 1982. Pro-evolution public interest (letter). BioScience 32(3):168
110. Whitcomb JC, Morris HR. 1963. The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed
111. Wills C, Lerner LS, Olson EC, Eimers LE, Dickerson RE. 1990. Report of visitation, Aug. 7-10, 1989, p. 22. Calif. State Dep. Educ: Private Postsecondary Educ. Div.
112. Wilson DB. 1983. Did the Devil Make Darwin Do It? Modern Perspectives on the Creation-Evolution Controversy. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
113. Young DA. 1982. Christianity and the Age of the Earth. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. 188 pp.
114. Zetterberg JP. 1983. Evolution versus Creationism: The Public Education Controversy. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx
115. Zimmerman M. 1987a. The evolution-creation controversy: opinions of Ohio high school biology teachers. Ohio J. Sci. 7:115-21
116. Zimmerman M. 1987b. Ohio school board presidents view of the evolution-creationism controversy, Part 1. Ohio Cent. Sci. Educ. Newsl., Oct., pp. 1, 3, 11
117. Zimmerman M. 1988. Ohio school board presidents view of the evolution-creationism controversy, Part 2. Ohio Cent. Sci. Educ. Newsl., Jan., pp. 1, 2