A case where access implies qualia?

Analysis

Volumn 60, Issue 265, 2000, Pages 30-37

  Clark, Andy ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002274187     PISSN: 00032638     EISSN: 14678284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8284.00199     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Akins, K. 1996. Lost the plot? reconstructing Dennett's Multiple Drafts theory of consciousness. Mind and Language 11: 1-43.
2. Block, N. 1995. On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18: 227-47.
3. Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Cowey, A. and P. Stoerig. 1995. Blindsight in monkeys. Nature 373: 247-49.
5. Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes' Error. Putnam, NY: Grosset.
6. Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. New York: Little Brown & Co.
7. Dennett, D. 1993. The message is: there is no medium. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 919-31.
8. Evans, G. 1985. Molyneux's question. In The Collected Papers of Gareth Evans. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
9. Grush, G. 1998. Skill and spatial content. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6: 1998 (http://www.phil.indiana.edu/ejap/).
10. Lycan, W. 1995. Consciousness as internal monitoring. In N. Block, O. Flanagan and G. Guzeldere, eds, The Nature of Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
11. Mack, A. and I. Rock. 1998. Inattentional Blindness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. Peacocke, C. 1992. Scenarios, concepts and perception. In T. Crane, ed., The Contents of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105-35.