Quantifying stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation resulting from leaf aging and drought in mature deciduous tree species

Tree Physiology

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 787-797

  Wilson, Kell B ^a   Baldocchi, Dennis D ^a,c   Hanson, Paul J ^b  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

A Ci curve; Leaf age; Maple; Oak; Photosynthetic limitations; Stomata

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002227914     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/20.12.787     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Assmann, S.M. 1988. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation: an evaluation of the path-dependent method. Plant Cell Environ. 11:577-582.
2. Ball, J.T. 1987. Calculations related to gas exchange. In Stomatal Function. Eds. E. Zeiger, G.D. Farquhar and I.R. Cowan. Stanford University Press, Stanford. CA, pp 445-476.
3. Bassow, S.L. and F.A. Bazzaz. 1998. How environmental conditions affect canopy leaf-level photosynthesis in four deciduous tree species. Ecology 79:2660-2675.
4. 2 assimilation in three tree species during natural drought conditions. Physiol. Plant. 66:521-526.
5. Comstock, J. and J. Ehleringer. 1984. Photosynthetic responses to slowly decreasing leaf water potentials in Encelia frutescens. Oecologia 61:241-261.
6. Cornic, G. 1994. Drought stress and high light effects on leaf photosynthesis. In Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis from Molecule to Field. Eds. N.R. Baker and J.R. Bowyer. Bioscience Publications, pp 297-313.
7. 2 uptake during rapid water stress. Physiol. Plant. 58:295-301.
8. Draper, N.R. and H. Smith. 1966. Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 706 p.
9. 2 transfer in the leaves of two tree species (Fagus sylvatica L. and Castenea saliva Mill.). Plant Cell Environ. 18:43-51.
10. Escalona, J.M., J. Flexas and H. Medrano. 1999. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis under water stress in fieldgrown grapevines. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 26:421-433.
11. 3 species. Planta 149:78-90.
12. Farquhar, G.D. and T.S. Sharkey. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33:317-345.
13. Field, C. 1987. Leaf-age effects on stomatal conductance. In Stomatal Function. Eds. E. Zeiger, G.D. Farquhar and I.R. Cowan. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 367-384.
14. Gunasekera, C. and G.A. Berkowitz. 1992. Heterogeneous stomatal closure in response to leaf water deficits is not a universal phenomenon. Plant Physiol. 103:629-635.
15. Hanson, P.J., L.J. Samuelson, S.D. Wullscheleger, T.A. Tabberer and G.S. Edwards. 1994. Seasonal patterns of light-saturated photosynthesis and leaf conductance for mature and seedling Quercus rubra L. foliage: differential sensitivity to ozone exposure. Tree Physiol. 14:1351-1366.
16. Hanson, P.J., D.E. Todd, M.A. Huston, J.D. Joslin, J.L. Croker and R. M. Auge. 1998. Description and field performance of the Walker Branch throughfall displacement experiment: 1993-1996. ORNL/ TM-13586, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 36 p.
17. 2. Plant Cell Environ. 15:271-282.
18. Harley, P.C., J.D. Tenhunen and O.L. Lange. 1986. Use of an analytical model to study limitations on net photosynthesis in Arbutus unedo under field conditions. Oecologia 70:393-401.
19. Hutmacher, R.B. and D.R. Krieg. 1983. Photosynthetic rate control in cotton. Stomatal and nonstomatal factors. Plant Physiol. 73: 658-661.
20. Johnson, D.W. and R.I. Van Hook, Eds. 1989. Analysis of biogeochemical cycling processes in Walker Branch Watershed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 401 p.
21. Jones, H.G. 1985. Partitioning stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 8:95-104.
22. Jones, H.G. 1998. Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J. Exp. Bot. 49:387-398.
23. Jurik, TW. 1986. Seasonal patterns of leaf photosynthetic capacity in successional northern hardwood tree species. Am. J. Bot. 73: 131-138.
24. Kubiske, M.E. and M.D. Abrams. 1992. Photosynthesis, water relations, and leaf morphology of xeric versus mesic Quercus rubra ecotypes in central Pennsylvania in relation to moisture stress. Can. J. For. Res. 22:1402-1407.
25. Kubiske, M.E. and M.D. Abrams. 1993. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis in 19 temperate tree species on contrasting sites during wet and dry years. Plant Cell Environ. 16: 1123-1129.
26. Kubiske, M.E., M.D. Abrams and S.A. Mostoller. 1996. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis in relation to the drought and shade tolerance of tree species in open and understory environments. Trees 11:76-82.
27. Laisk, A. 1983. Calculation of leaf photosynthetic parameters considering the statistical distribution of stomatal apertures. J. Exp. Bot. 34:1627-1635.
28. Loewenstein, N.J. and S.G. Pallardy. 1998. Drought tolerance, xylem sap abscisic acid and stomatal conductance during soil drying: a comparison of young plants of four temperate deciduous angiosperms. Tree Physiol. 18:421-430.
29. Ni, B.-R. and S.G. Pallardy. 1992. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to net photosynthesis in seedlings of woody angiosperms. Plant Physiol. 99:1502-1508.
30. Niinemets, U. and O. Kull. 1998. Stoichiometry of foliar carbon constituents varies along light gradients in temperate woody canopies: implications for foliage morphological plasticity. Tree Physiol. 18:467-479.
31. 2 and other gases inside leaves. New Phytol. 126:449-479.
32. Reich, P.B, M.B. Walters and D.S. Ellsworth. 1991. Leafage and season influence the relationships between leaf nitrogen, leaf mass per area and photosynthesis in maple and oak trees. Plant Cell Environ. 14:251-259.
33. 2 concentration in young birch (Betula pendula) trees. Tree Physiol. 18:441-450.
34. 2 availability in the chloroplasts of oak leaves from different species during drought. Ann. Sci. For. 53: 243-254.
35. Stewart, J.D., A. Zine El Abidine and P. Y. Bernier. 1994. Stomatal and mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis in black spruce seedlings during multiple cycles of drought. Tree Physiol. 15:57-64.
36. Sullivan, N.H, P.V. Bolstad and J.M. Vose. 1996. Estimates of net photosynthetic parameters in mature forests of the Southern Appalachians. Tree Physiol. 16:397-406.
37. Terashima, I. 1992. Anatomy of non-uniform photosynthesis. Photosynth. Res. 31:195-212.
38. Teskey, R.O., J.A. Fites, L.J. Samuelson and B.C. Bongarten. 1986. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to net photosynthesis in Pinus taeda L. under different environmental conditions. Tree Physiol. 2:131-142.
39. Walcroft, A.S., D. Whitehead, W.B. Silvester and F.M. Kelliher. 1997. The response of photosynthetic model parameters to temperature and nitrogen concentration in Pinus radiata D. Don. Plant Cell Environ. 20:1338-1348.
40. Weber, J.A. and D.M. Gates. 1990. Gas exchange in Quercus rubra (northern red oak) during a drought: analysis of relations among photosynthesis, transpiration, and leaf conductance. Tree Physiol. 7:215-225.
41. Wilson, K.B., P.J. Hanson and D.D. Baldocchi. 2000. Spatial and seasonal variability of photosynthetic parameters and their relationship to leaf nitrogen in a deciduous forest. Tree Physiol. 20:565-578.
42. Wong, S.C., I.R. Cowan and G.D. Farquhar. 1979. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282: 424-426.
43. i curves from 109 species. J. Exp. Bot. 44:907-920.
44. Wullschleger, S.D., P.J. Hanson and T. Tschaplinski. 1998. Wholeplant water flux in understory red maple exposed to altered precipitation regimes. Tree Physiol. 18:71-79.