Attention operating characteristics in a location-cuing task

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 126, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 271-287

  Gottlob, Lawrence R ^b   Cheal, Marylou ^b   Lyon, Don R ^a  

^a RAYTHEON COMPANY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002223620     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221309909595367     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allport, A. (1992). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 183-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bonnel, A-M., & Miller, J. (1994). Attentional effects on concurrent psychophysical discriminations: Investigations of a sample-size model. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 162-179.
3. Chastain, G., & Cheal, M. L. (1997). Facilitatory or inhibitory nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 328-347.
4. Chastain, G., Cheal, M. L., & Lyon, D. R. (1996). Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 300-309.
5. Cheal, M. L. (1997). Understanding diverse effects of visual attention with the VAP-Filters metaphor. Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 348-362.
6. Cheal, M. L., & Gregory, M. (1997). Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 51-71.
7. Cheal, M. L., & Lyon, D. (1989). Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 719-746.
8. Cheal, M. L., Lyon, D. R., & Gottlob, L. R. (1994). A framework for understanding the allocation of attention in a location-precued discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A. Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 699-739.
9. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
10. Gottlob, L. R., Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1999). Time course of location cuing effects with a probability manipulation. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 261-270.
11. Johnson, D. N., & Yantis, S. (1995). Allocating visual attention: Tests of a two process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1376-1390.
12. Jonides, J. (1980). Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 103-112.
13. Kinchla, R. A. (1980). The measurement of attention. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Koopman, B. O. (1957). The theory of search, Pt. III: The optimum distribution of searching effort. Operations Research, 5, 613-626.
15. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1986). Variations in the size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 188-200.
16. Madden, D. J., Connelly, S. L., & Pierce, T. W. (1994). Adult age differences in shifting focused attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 528-538.
17. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data limited and resource limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
18. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
19. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Shaw, M. L., & Shaw, M. P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 201-211.
21. Shepherd, M., Findlay, J. M., & Hockey, R. J. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 475-491.
22. Shiffrin, R. M., Diller, D., & Cohen, A. (1996). Processing visual information in an unattended location. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Sperling, G. W. (1984). A unified theory of attention and signal detection. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 103-181). London: Academic Press.
24. Sperling, G. W., & Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. Boff, L. Kauffman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and performance (Vol. 1, pp. 1-85). New York: Wiley.
25. Sperling, G., & Melchner, M. J. (1978a). The attention operating characteristic: Some examples from visual search. Science, 202, 315-318.
26. Sperling, G., & Melchner, M. J. (1978b). Visual search, visual attention, and the attention operating characteristic. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance VII (pp. 675-686). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Sperling, G., & Weichselgartner, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review, 102, 503-532.
28. Stone, L. D. (1975). Theory of optimal search. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1989). Probability matching in visual selection. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 43, 45-52.
30. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.