-
11
-
-
84933313699
-
-
Problems in naming the different types of inclusion compounds have been recognised for several years. See H. M. Powell [10], p. 438 and [3].
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
84933313696
-
-
Derived from the Latin word clathratus meaning enclosed or protected by cross bars of a grating. Originally introduced by Powell [12] to describe a ‘particular form of host-guest compound in which one component forms a cage structure imprisoning the other’. Nowadays used in a more general sense.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
37049062099
-
394. Condensation products of phenols and ketones. Part X. The structure of dianin's compounds, a unique inclusion-forming substance
-
W. Baker, A. J. Floyd, J. F. W. McOmie, G. Pope, A. S. Weaving, and J. H. Wild: J. Chem. Soc. 2010 (1956).
-
(1956)
Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed)
, pp. 2010
-
-
Baker, W.1
Floyd, A.J.2
McOmie, J.F.W.3
Pope, G.4
Weaving, A.S.5
Wild, J.H.6
-
18
-
-
84933313697
-
-
E. Weber and M. Czugler, presented at the Second International Symposium on Clathrate Compounds and Inclusion Phenomena, Parma, August 30–September 3, 1982.
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
84933313700
-
-
For an earlier definition, see F. R. Senti and S. R. Erlander [10], p. 568.
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
84933313681
-
-
This term was originally reserved to designate host-guest compounds which did not appear to be held together by classical chemical bonds and whose bonding was not well understood, cf. L. C. Fetterly [10], p. 491.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
84933313682
-
-
J. W. H. M. Uiterwijk, S. Harkema, J. Geevers, and D. N. Reinhoudt: J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 200 (1982).
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
84933313683
-
-
A further subdivision is possible here by adding superscripts to the prefix notations, e.g., {∞1} standing for an infinite one-dimensional propagation of the host-guest interaction (chain structure), {∞3} indicating a three-dimensional network.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
84933313684
-
-
In a very recent publication [27] the term cavitand, respectively cavitate, was proposed as a class name to define “synthetic organic compounds that contain enforced cavities large enough to accommodate simple molecules or ions”. The range of validity of our suggestion to use the term cavitate (cavitand), however, is more universal. It has the advantage to be free of any subjective commitment with regard to the attribute ‘enforced cavity’, instead of simply expressing a molecular cavity whatever size, shape and rigidity.
-
-
-
|
