Gender differences in responses to discrepancies in desired level of sexual intimacy

Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality

Volumn 8, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 49-67

  O'Suliivan, Lucia F ^a   Byers, E Sandra ^b  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002180650     PISSN: 08907064     EISSN: 15408698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J056v08n01_04     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aizenman, M., & Kelley, G. (1988). The incidence of violence and acquaintance rape in dating relationships among college men and women. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 305-311.
2. Baucom, D. H., Sayers, S. L., & Duhe, A. (1989). Attributional style and attribu-tional patterns among married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 596-607.
3. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613-628.
4. Brickman, J., & Briere, J. (1984). Incidence of rape and sexual assault in an urban Canadian population. International Journal of Women & Studies, 7, 195-206.
5. Byers, E. S., & Heinlein, L. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couples. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 210-231.
6. Byers, E. S., & Lewis, K. (1988). Dating couples’ disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacy. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 15-29.
7. Byers, E. S., & Wilson, P. (1985), Accuracy of women’s expectations regarding men’s responses to refusals of sexual advances in dating situations. International Journal of Women's Studies, 4. 376-387.
8. Carroll, J L., Volk, K. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 131-139.
9. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. (1985). An empirical assessment of some feminist hypotheses about rape. International Journal of Womens Studies, 8, 414-422.
10. Christopher, F. S., & Cate, R. M. (1985). Anticipated influences on sexual decision-making for first intercourse. Family Relations, 34, 265-270.
11. Christopher, F. S., & Frandsen, M. M. (1990). Strategies of influence in sex and dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 89-105.
12. Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39-55.
13. Finlay, B., Starnes, C. E., & Alvarez, F. B. (1985). Recent changes in sex-role ideology among divorced men and women: Some possible causes and implications. Sex Roles, 12, 637-653.
14. Knox, D., & Wilson, K. (1981). Dating behaviors of university students. Family Relations, 30, 255-258.
15. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
16. Lawson, A. (1988). Adultery. New York: Basic Books.
17. Lewin, M, (1985). Unwanted intercourse: The difficulty of saying no. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 184-192.
18. Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670-681.
19. McCormick, N. B. (1979). Come-ons and put-offs: Unmarried students’ strategies for having and avoiding sexual intercourse. Psychology of Women Quarterly 4, 194-211.
20. Miller, B., & Marshall, J. C. (1987). Coercive sex on the university campus. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 38-47.
21. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men’s self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58-72.
22. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.
23. Mynatt, C. R., & Allgeier, E. R. (1990). Risk factors, self-attributions, and adjustment problems among victims of sexual coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 130-153.
24. O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 29, 435-446.
25. O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1993). Eroding stereotypes: College women’s attempts to influence reluctant male sexual partners. The Journal of Sex Research, 30, 270-282.
26. Perper, T„ & Weis, D. L. (1987). Preceptive and rejective strategies in U.S. and Canadian college women. The Journal of Sex Research, 23, 455-480.
27. Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N, J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689-701.
28. Sherwin, R., & Corbett, S. (1985). Campus sexual norms and dating relationships: A trend analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 21, 258-274.
29. Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 237-246.
30. Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234-241.
31. Zilbergeld, B. (1992). The new male sexuality. New York: Bantam Books.