Picking Winners or Piloting Best Value? An Analysis of English Best Value Bids

Local Government Studies

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 53-67

  Martin, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002164444     PISSN: 03003930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03003939908433947     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Audit Commission, 1998, 'Learning from the Pilots' (unpublished paper to the Best Value Advisory Group).
2. 4014, 1998, 'Modem Local Government: In Touch with the People' (London: HMSO).
3. House of Commons.,1998a, Local Government Bill, 52/2 (London: House of Commons).
4. House of Commons, 1998b, Implementation of the Best Value framework: Minutes of Evidence to the Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee: Eleventh Report Vol. I (London: HMSO).
5. DETR, 1997, The Twelve Principles of Best Value (London: DETR).
6. DETR, 1998a, Modernising Local Government: Improving Local Services through Best Value (DETR, London).
7. Filkin, G. and P. Corrigan, 1997, Learning from the Bids (London: Local Government Management Board).
8. Martin, S.J. et al., 1998, Best Value: Current Developments and Challenges (London: LGA).
9. IPPR, 1998, Leading the Way: A New Vision for Local Government (London: IPPR).
10. Labour Party, 1997, Britain Deserves Better (London: Labour Party).
11. Perri 6, 1997, Holistic Government (London: Demos).
12. Stoker, G., 1997, 'Local Political Participation', in New Perspectives on Local Governance (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).