Fixing compensatory mitigation: What will it take?

Ecological Applications

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 94-101

  Race, Margaret S ^a   Fonseca, Mark S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SOUTHEAST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Compensatory mitigation; Habitat mitigation; Habitat replacement; Man made wetlands; Mitigation failures; Mitigation policies; Permit compliance; Restoration of aquatic ecosystems; Wetlands management; Wetlands mitigation; Wetlands restoration

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002154042     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2269556     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Batha, R., and A. Pendleton. 1987. Mitigation: a good tool that needs sharpening. California Waterfront Age 3(2):15-17.
2. BCDC [Bay Conservation and Development Commission]. 1988. Mitigation: an analysis of tideland restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, 30 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102 USA.
3. Bedford, B. L., and E. M. Preston. 1988. Developing the scientific basis for assessing cumulative effects of wetland loss and degradation on landscape functions: status, perspectives and prospects. Environmental Management 12:751-771.
4. Cortner, H. J., and M. A. Moote. 1994. Trends and issues in land and water resources management: setting the agenda for change. Environmental Management 19:167-173.
5. Eliot, W. 1985. Implementing mitigation policies in San Francisco Bay: a critique. State Coastal Conservancy, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, California, USA.
6. Gladwin, D., and J. Roelle. 1992. "Nationwide permits: case studies highlight concerns." National Wetlands Newsletter 14(2):7-9.
7. Harvey, T., and M. Josselyn. 1986. Wetlands restoration and mitigation policies: comment. Environmental Management 10:567-569.
8. Jensen, D. B. 1987. Mitigation banking: protecting resources or minimizing enforcement costs? Thesis. Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
9. King, D. M. 1992. "Avoiding another taxpayer bailout." National Wetlands Newsletter 14(1):11-12.
10. King, D., and C. Bohlen. 1994. "Estimating the costs of wetlands mitigation." National Wetlands Newsletter 16(3):3-8.
11. Kusler, J. A., and M. E. Kentula. 1989. Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. Volumes 1 and 2. EPA 600/3-87/0386. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Lab, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
12. Lewis, R. R. 1992. "Why Florida needs mitigation banking." National Wetlands Newsletter 14(1):7.
13. Ludwig, D. 1993. Environmental sustainability: magic, science and religion in natural resource management. Ecological Applications 3:555-558.
14. Mager, A. 1990. National Marine Fisheries Service habitat conservation efforts related to federal regulatory programs in the southeastern United States. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEC-260.
15. NRC [National Research Council]. 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
16. Newman, V. D. 1986. "Reinventing the swamp." National Wetlands Newsletter 8(5):15-16.
17. Nicholas, S. 1992. "Beyond no net loss." National Wetlands Newsletter 14(4):12.
18. O'Donnell, A. 1988. The policy implications of wetlands creation. Pages 141-144 in J. Zelanzy and J. S. Feierbbend, editors. Increasing our wetland resource: proceedings of a conference. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C., USA.
19. Quammen, M. L. 1986a. Summary of conference and information for mitigation in wetlands. Pages 151-158 in R. Stickland, editor. Wetlands functions, rehabilitation, and creation in the Pacific Northwest. The state of our understanding. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington, USA.
20. _. 1986/b. "Measuring the success of wetlands mitigation." National Wetlands Newsletter 8(5):6-8.
21. Race, M. S. 1985. Critique of present wetlands mitigation policies in the United States based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. Environmental Management 9:71-82.
22. _. 1986. Wetlands restoration and mitigation policies: reply. Environmental Management 10:571-572.
23. Race, M. S., and D. R. Christie. 1982. Coastal zone development: mitigation, marsh creation, and decision-making. Environmental Management 6:317-328.
24. Redmond, A. 1992. "How successful is mitigation?" National Wetlands Newsletter 14(1):5-6.
25. Rivera, J. A., A. Mager, R. L. Ferguson, D. W. Field, and F. A. Cross. 1992. Verification of submerged aquatic vegetation in alterations associated with Corps of Engineers permit requests. Pages 781-794 in First thematic conference on remote sensing for marine and coastal ecosystems, New Orleans, Louisiana, 15-17 June 1992. Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
26. Roberts, L. 1993. Wetlands trading is a loser's game, say ecologists. Science 260:1890-1892.
27. Shisler, J., and D. Charette. 1986. "Evaluation of artificial salt marshes in New Jersey." National Wetlands Newsletter 8(3):4-5.
28. Thayer, G. W. 1992. Restoring the nation's marine environment. Maryland Sea Grant College Publication Um-SG-Ts92-06. University of Maryland Sea Grant Program, College Park, Maryland, USA.
29. Wilmar, M. 1986. "Mitigation: the applicant's perspective." National Wetlands Newsletter 5(8):16-17.
30. Wilms, R. P. 1990. "Toward an equitable wetlands policy." Builder Review. March 1990:10-11.
31. Wold, C. A. 1990. NOAA's civil penalty policy: time for a change. Coastal Management 18:213-230.
32. Zedler, J. 1987. Mitigation problems on the Southern California coast. California Waterfront Age 3(1):32-33.
33. _. 1996a. Ecological issues in wetland mitigation: an introduction to the forum. Ecological Applications 6:33-37.
34. _. 1996b. Coastal mitigation in southern California: the need for a regional restoration strategy. Ecological Applications 6:84-93.