A computational model of social perlocutions

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2, Issue , 1998, Pages 1020-1026

  Pautler, David ^a   Quilici, Alex ^a  

^a University of Hawaii at Manoa   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIP; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION; SOCIAL COMMUNICATIONS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 0002139539     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. J. F. Allen, L. K. Schubert, G. Ferguson, P. Heeman, C. H. Hwang, T. Kato, M. Li ght, N. G. Martin, B. W. Miller, M. Poesio, and D. R. Traum. 1994. The TRAINS project: A ease study in building a conversational planning agen t. Technical Report 532, Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
2. D. Appelt. 1985. Planning English sentences. New York: Cambridge Universit y Press.
3. J.L. Austin. 1975. Sow to do things with words. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
4. D. Barnlund. 1989. Communicate styles of Japanese and Americans: Images and Realities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
5. B. Bruce. 1975. Belief systems and language understanding. Technical Repor t 2973. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman.
6. D. Chin. 1989. KNOME: Modeling What The User Knows In UC. In, A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds): User Modeling in Dialog Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Spring-Verlag, pages 74-107.
7. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. 1990. Rational interaction as a basis for communication. In Cohen, Morgan, and Pollack 1990.
8. P. R. Cohen and C. R. Perrault. 1979. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science 3. 177-212.
9. P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack (eds). 1990. Intentions in communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. J. A. Daly and J. M. Wiemann (eds). 1994. Strategic interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. H. P. Grice. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts, (eds) P. Cole and J. L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press.
12. J. R. Hobbs. 1982. Towards an understanding of coherence in discourse. In S trategies for natural language processing, (eds.) W. Lehnert and M. Ringle. Hil lsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. E. H. Hovy. 1988. Generating natural language under pragmatic constraints. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. E. H. Hovy. 1993. Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relat ions. Artificial Intelligence 63. 341-385.
15. D. Kiesler. 1983. The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review (90) 3. 185-214.
16. J. D. Moore and C. L. Paris. 1994. Planning text for advisory dialogues: Capturing intentional and rhetorical information. Computational Linguistics (19) 4. 651-694.
17. A. Ortony, G. Clore, and A. Collins. 1988. The cognitive structure ofemotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. D. Pautler, 1999. A Computer Model of Strategic Aspects of Interpersonal Communication., Forthcoming Phd Dissertation.
19. C. R. Perrault and J. Allen. 1980. A plan-based analysis of indirect speech acts. American Journal of Computational Linguistics (6) 3-4. 167-182.
20. J. Searle. 1969. Speech acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. A. Wierzbicka. 1987. English speech act verbs. Sydney: Academic Press.