State nonprofit data bases: Lessons from the California experience

Nonprofit Management and Leadership

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 447-454

  Orend, Richard J ^a   O'Neill, Michael ^a   Mitchell, Connie S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002134112     PISSN: 10486682     EISSN: 15427854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nml.4130070410     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Froelich, K. A. “The IRS 990 Return: Beyond the Internal Revenue Service.” Unpublished manuscript, College of Business Administration, North Dakota State University, 1996.
2. Froelich, K. A. and Knoepfle, T. W. “Internal Revenue Service 990 Data: Fact or Fiction.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1996, 25(1), 40–52.
3. Grønbjerg, K. A. “Using NTEE To Classify Non-Profit Organizations: An Assessment of Human Service and Regional Applications.” Voluntas, 1994, 5(3), 301–328.
4. Kaple, D., Morris, L., Rivkin-Fish, Z. and DiMaggio, P. Data on Arts Organizations: A Review and Needs Assessment, with Design Implications. Princeton, N.J.: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University, 1996.
5. Sales, G. A Taxonomy of Human Services. Los Angeles: Information and Referral Federation of Los Angeles County, 1991.
6. Smith, B. The Use of Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes to Classify Activities of Nonprofit, Tax-Exempt Organizations. Working Paper No. 19. San Francisco: Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management, University of San Francisco, 1992.
7. Smith, D. H. “Four Sectors or Five? Retaining the Membership Sector.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1991, 20(2), 137–150.
8. Smith, D. H. “Public Benefit and Member Benefit Nonprofit, Voluntary Groups.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1993, 22(1), 53–68.