Field resistance to the potato leafroll luteovirus in transgenic and somaclone potato plants reduces tuber disease symptoms

Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 260-266

  Kawchuk, Lawrence M ^a   Lynch, Dermot R ^a   Martin, Robert R ^a   Kozub, Gerry C ^a   Farries, Bryan ^a  

^a LETHBRIDGE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LUTEOVIRUS; POTATO LEAFROLL VIRUS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; TUBEROSUM;

EID: 0002086336     PISSN: 07060661     EISSN: 17152992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07060669709500521     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barker, H., and Harrison, B. D., 1985. Restricted multiplication of potato leafroll virus in resistant potato genotypes. Ann. Appl. Biol., 107:205–212.
2. Barker, H., Reavy, B., Kumar, A., Webster, K. D., and Mayo, M. A., 1992. Restricted virus multiplication in potatoes transformed with the coat protein gene of potato leafroll luteovirus:similarities with a type of host gene-mediatedresistance. Ann. Appl. Biol., 120:55–64.
3. Barker, H., Webster, K. D., Jolly, C. A., Reavy, B., Kumar, A., and Mayo, M. A., 1994. Enhancement of resistance to potato leafroll virus multiplication in potato by combining the effects of host genes and transgenes. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., 7:528–530.
4. Belknap, W. R., Corsini, D., Pavek, J. J., Snyder, G. W., Rockhold, D. R., and Vayda, M. E., 1994. Field performance of transgenic Russet Burbank and Lemhi Russet potatoes. Am. Potato J., 71:285–296.
5. Bernatzky, R., and Tanksley, S. D., 1986. Genetics of actinrelated sequences in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet., 72:314–321.
6. Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M., 1957. Experimental Designs, 2nd ed., London:John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 611 pp.
7. Dale, P. J., and McPartlan, H. C., 1992. Field performance of transgenic potato plants compared with controls regenerated from tuber discs and shoot cuttings. Theor. Appl. Genet., 84:585–591.
8. de Bokx, J. A., 1967. The callose test for the detection of leafroll virus in potato tubers. Eur. Potato J., 10:221–234.
9. Harrison, B. D., 1984. “ Potato leafroll virus. No. 339 ”. In Descriptions of Plant Viruses, Kew, Surrey, England:Commonw. Mycol. Inst./Assoc. Appl. Biol. 6 pp.
10. Kawchuk, L. M., Martin, R. R., and McPherson, J., 1990. Resistance in transgenic potato expressing the potato leafroll virus coat protein gene. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., 3:301–307.
11. Kawchuk, L. M., Martin, R. R., and McPherson, J., 1991. Sense and antisense RNA-mediated resistance to potato leafroll virus in Russet Burbank potato plants. Mol. Plant- Microbe Interact., 4:247–253.
12. Kawchuk, L. M., Martin, R. R., Rochon, D. M., and McPherson, J., 1989. Identification and characterization of the potato leafroll virus putative coat protein gene. J. Gen. Virol., 70:783–788.
13. Keese, P., Martin, R. R., Kawchuk, L. M., Waterhouse, P. M., and Gerlach, W. L., 1990. Nucleotide sequences of an Australian and a Canadian isolate of potato leafroll luteovirus and their relationships with two European isolates. J. Gen. Virol., 71:719–724.
14. Krishnamurthi, M., and Tlaskal, J., 1974. Fiji disease resistant Saccharum officinarum var. Pinder subclones from tissue cultures. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol., 15:130–137.
15. Mayo, M. A., Robinson, D. J., Jolly, C. A., and Hyman, L., 1989. Nucleotide sequence of potato leafroll luteovirus RNA. J. Gen. Virol., 70:1037–1051.
16. Nickell, L. G., and Heinz, D. J., 1973. “ Potential of cell and tissue culture techniques as aids in economic plant improvement ”. In Genes, Enzymes, and Populations, Edited by:Srb, A. M., 109–128. New York:Plenum.
17. Presting, G. G., Smith, O. P., and Brown, C. R., 1995. Resistance to potato leafroll virus in potato plants transformed with the coat protein gene or with vector control constructs. Phytopathology, 85:436–442.
18. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T., 1989. Molecular cloning:a laboratory manual, New York:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
19. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 6, 4th ed., Cary, N.C.:SAS Institute Inc. 1686 pp.
20. Shepard, J. F., Bidney, D., and Shahin, E., 1980. Potato protoplasts in crop improvement. Science, 28:17–24.
21. Southern, E. M., 1975. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol., 98:503–517.
22. Stachel, S. E., Timmerman, B., and Zambryski, P., 1986. Generation of single-stranded T-DNA molecules during the initial stages of T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant cells. Nature, 322:706–712.
23. Thuring, R. W. J., Sanders, J. P. M., and Borst, P., 1975. A freeze-squeeze method for recovering long DNA from agarose gels. Anal. Biochem., 66:213–220.
24. van der Wilk, F., Huisman, M. J., Cornelissen, B. J. C., Huttinga, H., and Goldbach, R., 1989. Nucleotide sequence and organization of potato leafroll virus genomic RNA. FEBS Letters, 245:51–56.
25. van der Wilk, F., Willink, D. P.-L., Huisman, M. J., Huttinga, H., and Goldbach, R., 1991. Expression of the potato leafroll luteovirus coat protein gene in transgenic potato plants inhibits viral infection. Plant Mol. Biol., 17:431–439.
26. Wang, K., Herrera-Estrella, L., Van Montagu, M., and Zambryski, P., 1984. Right 25 bp terminus sequence of the nopaline T-DNA is essential for and determines the direction of DNA transfer from Agrobacterium to the plant genome. Cell, 38:455–462.
27. Waterhouse, P. M., Gildow, F. E., and Johnstone, G. R., 1988. “ Luteovirus group. No. 339 ”. In Descriptions of Plant Viruses, Kew, Surrey, England:Commonw. Mycol. Inst./Assoc. Appl. Biol. 9 pp.