Issues and challenges of archiving and storing digital information: Preserving the past for future scholars

Journal of Library Administration

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 61-79

  Butler, Meredith ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002047672     PISSN: 01930826     EISSN: 15403564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J111v24n04_07     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Schama, Simon. The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age. New York: Knopf, 1987, p. 8-9.
2. Association of Research Libraries. ARL Statistics 1992-93. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1994. n.p.
3. Association of Research Libraries. ARL Statistics 1994-95. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1996. p. 11.
4. Commission on Preservation and Access. “Commission Distributes Annual Report,” Commission on Preservation and Access Newsletter (Nov.-Dec. 1995): 1.
5. There were approximately 471 million volumes in all doctoral degree granting institutions at the end of fiscal year 1992. The Bowker Annual. New Jersey: R.R. Bowker Co., 1996. p. 450.
6. Marcum, Deanna B. “The Fullest Definition of Preservation,” The Commission on Preservation and Access Newsletter (May 1995):l.
7. The Commission on Preservation and Access. The Digital Libraty Consortium Mission and Goals. Washington, DC: Commission on Preservation and Access, 1994. n.p.
8. Kenney, Anne R. “Digital-to-Microfilm Conversion: An Interim Preservation Solution,” Library Resources & Technical Services 37, no. 4 (1993); 381.
9. Brickford, Maynard and William Maher. “Archival Issues in Network Electronic Publications,” Library Trends 43, no. 4 (Spring 1995): 704.
10. Lesk, Michael. Preservation of New Technology. Washington, DC: The Commission on Preservation and Access, 1992. p. 2-3.
11. Graham, Peter. Intellectual Preservation: Electronic Preservation of the Third Kind. Washington, DC: TheCommission on Preservation and Access, 1994.p. 1-2.
12. Rothenberg, Jeff. “Ensuring the Longevity of Digital Documents,” Scientific American 272 (January 1995): 45.
13. West, Linda. “Q & A with Linda West,” The Research Libraries Group News 38(Fall 1995): 7.
14. The Commission on Preservation and Access. “National Digital Library Federation Planning Underway,” The Commission on Preservation and Access Newsletter (Oct. 1995): 4.
15. Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information, Preserving Digital Information. Draft Report Washington, DC: Commission on Preservation and Access, August, 1995. p. ii.
16. Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information, Preserving Digital Information. Draft Report Washington, DC: Commission on Preservation and Access, May 1996. p. 7.
17. Graham, Peter S, “Requirements for the Digital Research Library,” College and Research Libraries 56, no. 4 (1995): 331.
18. Erway, Ricky L. “Digital Initiatives of the Research Libraries Group,” in D-Lib Magazine (Dec. 1996) at http://www.dlib.org.
19. Association of Research Libraries. “Yale Study of Imaging Costs: Some Early Findings,” ARL Newsletter (Oct. 1995): 6-7
20. “Big Arts Groups Starting Drives for New Funds,” New York Times (February 4, 1997) Section A: 1
21. Interview with Peter Rogers in “EEPC Report Urges Water Cost Hike,” Harvard University Gazette (Sept. 9, 1988): 1
22. Patricia Battin, “New Ways of Thinking About Financing Information Services.” In: Organizing and Managing Information Resources on Campus, cd. Brian L. Hawkins (Texas: Academic Computing Publishers, Inc., 1987): 370.