Inflorescence morphology, heterochrony, and phylogeny in the mimosoid tribes Ingeae and Acacieae (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae)

Botanical Review

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 317-347

  Grimes, James ^a  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS VICTORIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACACIEAE; FABACEAE; INGEAE; MIMOSOIDEAE;

EID: 0002044549     PISSN: 00068101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02857753     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alberch, P. 1980. Ontogenesis and morphological diversification. Amer. Zool. 20: 653-667.
2. _, P., S. J. Gould, G. F. Oster & D. B. Wake. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296-317.
3. Barlow, P. W. 1989. Meristems, metamers, and modules, and the development of shoot and root systems. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 100: 255-279.
4. Barneby, R. C. 1998. Silk tree, guanacaste, monkey's earring: A generic system for the synandrous Mimosaceae of the Americas. Part III. Calliandra. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 74(3): 1-223.
5. _ & J. W. Grimes. 1996. Silk tree, guanacaste, monkey's earring: A generic system for the synandrous Mimosaceae of the Americas. Part I. Abarema, Albizia, and allies. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 74(1): 1-292.
6. _ & _. 1997. Silk tree, guanacaste, monkey's earring: A generic system for the synandrous Mimosaceae of the Americas. Part II. Pithecellobium, Cojoba, and Zygia. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 74(2): 1-149.
7. Briggs, B. G. & L. A. S. Johnson. 1979. Evolution in the Myrtaceae - Evidence from inflorescence structure. Abstr. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 102: 157-256.
8. Brown, C. L. & H. E. Sommer. 1992. Shoot growth and histogenesis of trees possessing diverse patterns of shoot growth. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 335-346.
9. Farris, J. S. 1988. Hennig86. Distributed by the author.
10. Fink, S. 1983. The occurrence of adventitious and preventitious buds within the bark of some temperate and tropical trees. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 523-542.
11. Goloboff, P. 1993. Nona. Distributed by the author.
12. Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Belknap Press, Cambridge.
13. Grimes, J. W. 1992. Metamerism, heterochrony, and inflorescence morphology of the Pithecellobium-complex (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae: Ingeae). Brittonia 44: 140-159.
14. _. 1995. Generic relationships of Mimosoideae tribe Ingeae, with emphasis on the New World Pithecellobium-complex. Pp. 101-121 in M. Crisp & J. J. Doyle (eds.), Advances in legume systematics 7: Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
15. _. 1996. Branch apices, heterochrony, and inflorescence morphology in some mimosoid legumes (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Telopea 6: 729-748.
16. Guinet, P. 1981. Mimosoideae: The characters of their pollen grains. Pp. 835-855 in R. M. Polhill & P. H. Raven (eds.), Advances in legume systematics 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
17. _ & J. Grimes. 1997. A summary of pollen characteristics of some New World members of the Pithecellobium-complex. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 74: 151-161.
18. _ & H. M. Hernández. 1989. Pollen characters in the genera Zapoteca and Calliandra (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae), their systematic significance and phylogenetic relevance. Pollen & Spores 31: 5-22.
19. Gunn, C. R. 1984. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Mimosoideae (Fabaceae). Techn. Bull. U.S.D.A. Agric. Res. Serv. 1681: 1-194.
20. Holttum, P. E. 1953. Evolutionary trends in an equatorial climate. Soc. Exp. Biol. Symp. 7: 159-173.
21. Jones, M. 1985. Modular demography and form in the silver birch. Pp. 223-237 in J. White (ed.), Studies in plant demography. Academic Press, London.
22. Kevekordes, K. G., M. E. McCully & M. J. Canny. 1988. The occurrence of an extended bundle sheath system (paraveinal meophyll) in the legumes. Canad. J. Bot. 66: 94-100.
23. Koriba, K. 1958. On the periodicity of tree growth in the tropics. Gard. Bull. Straits Settlem. 17: 11-81.
24. Maumont, S. 1993. Seed-coat anatomy of non-pleurogrammic seeds in the tribe Ingeae (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae). Brittonia 45: 249-259.
25. McKinney, M. L. 1988. Classifying heterochrony: Allometry, size and time. Pp. 17-34 in M. L. McKinney (ed.), Heterochrony in evolution: A multidisciplinary approach. Plenum Press, New York.
26. _ & K.J. McNamara. 1991. Heterochrony: The evolution of ontogeny. Plenum Press, New York.
27. McNamara, K. J. 1986. A guide to the nomenclature of heterochrony. J. Paleontol. 60: 4-13.
28. Nielsen, I. 1981. Ingeae. Pp. 173-190 in R. M. Polhill & P. H. Raven, editors, Advances in legume systematics, pt. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
29. Nixon, K. C. 1994. Clados. Distributed by the author.
30. _. 1995. Dada. Distributed by the author.
31. Stanley, S. M. 1975. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 72: 646-650.
32. _. 1979. Macroevolution - Pattern and process. Freeman, San Francisco.
33. Tucker, S. C. 1989. Evolutionary implications of floral ontogeny in legumes. Pp. 59-75 in C. H. Stirton & J. L. Zarucchi (eds.), Advances in legume biology. Syst. Bot. Monogr. Missouri Bot. Gard. 29.
34. White, J. 1984. Plant metamerisim. Pp. 15-47 in R. Dirzo & J. Sarukhan, editors, Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.