Reply: On the utility of the goals-plans-action sequence

Communication Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 300-304

  Dillard, James Price ^a   Schrader, David C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002040353     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510979809368540     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. Berlo, D.K., 1960. The process of communication, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
2. Dennett, D.C., 1995. Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life, New York: Simon & Schuster.
3. Dillard, J.P., 1989. Types of influence goals in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6: 293-308.
4. Dillard, J.P., 1990. “ A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence ”. In Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages, Edited by: Dillard, J.P., 41-56. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
5. Dillard, J.P., Solomon, D.H., and Palmer, M.T., 1999. Structuring the concept of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 66: 49-65.
6. Hample, D., 1997. “ Framing message production research using field theory ”. In Message production: Advances in communication theory, Edited by: Greene, J.O., 171-192. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Harre, R., and Secord, P.F., 1972. The explanation of social behavior, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
8. Shepherd, G.J., 1992. Communication as influence: Definitional exclusion. Communication Studies, 43: 203-219.
9. Shepherd, G.J., 1993. Building a discipline of communication. Journal of Communication, 43: 83-91.