Urban housing policy in the 1990s

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 673-693

  Gabriel, Stuart A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Housing; Markets; Policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002030569     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.1996.9521238     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Apgar, William. 1991. Preservation of Existing Housing: A Key Element in a Revitalized National Housing Policy. Housing Policy Debate 2(2):187-210.
2. Baer, William C. 1976. The Evolution of Housing Indicators and Housing Standards. Public Policy 24(3):361-93.
3. Berkovec, James, Glenn Canner, Stuart Gabriel, and Tim Hannon. 1994. Race, Redlining, and Residential Mortgage Loan Performance. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 9:263-94.
4. Canner, Glenn, and Stuart Gabriel. 1992. Market Segmentation and Lender Specialization in the Primary and Secondary Mortgage Markets. Housing Policy Debate 3(2):241-329.
5. Devaney, John F. 1991. Housing in America: 1989-1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
6. Fannie Mae Office of Housing Policy Research. 1992. Discrimination in Housing and Mortgage Markets. Housing Policy Debate 3(2).
7. Goering, John, Helene Stebbins, and Michael Siewert. 1995. Promoting Housing Choice in HUD's Rental Assistance Programs. Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
8. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. 1995. The State of the Nation's Housing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
9. Koebel, C. Theodore, and Gara L. Bailey. 1992. State Policies and Programs to Preserve Federally Assisted Low-Income Housing. Housing Policy Debate 3(4):995-1016.
10. Megbolugbe, Isaac F., and Patrick A. Simmons. 1995. An Overview of Demographic Trends and Housing Market Impacts: 1995-2000. Internal Research Report. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Office of Housing Research.
11. Munnell, Alicia, Lynn Browne, James McEnearney, and Geoffrey Tootell. 1992. Mortgage Lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA Data. Working Paper No. 92-7. Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
12. Myers, Dowell, and Jennifer Wolch. 1994. Housing Mimeo. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, School of Urban and Regional Planning and Department of Geography.
13. Nenno, Mary. 1991. State and Local Governments: New Initiatives in Low-Income Housing Preservation. Housing Policy Debate 2(2):467-97.
14. Retsinas, Nicolas P. 1995. Comment on "FHA Restructuring Proposals: Alternatives and Implications." Housing Policy Debate 6(2):395-415.
15. Schnare, Ann B. 1991. The Preservation Needs of Public Housing. Housing Policy Debate 2(2):289-318.
16. U.S. Census Bureau. 1996. Housing Vacancy Survey: Third Quarter 1996. World Wide Web page http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hvs.html (last revised October 22).
17. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1989. Report to Congress on Alternative Methods for Funding Public Housing Modernization. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1995. HUD Reinvention: From Blueprint to Action. Washington, DC.
19. Vandell, Kerry D. 1995. FHA Restructuring Proposals: Alternatives and Implications. Housing Policy Debate 6(2):291-393.
20. Wallace, James E. 1991. Who Benefits from Preservation: The People behind the Numbers. Housing Policy Debate 2(2):219-44.
21. Weicher, John C. 1995. Comment on "FHA Restructuring Proposals: Alternatives and Implications." Housing Policy Debate 6(2):417-37.
22. Yinger, John. 1990. Estimates of the Incidence and the Severity of Unfavorable Treatment from the Housing Discrimination Study. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.