Fertility Preferences and Contraceptive Change in Developing Countries

International Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 100-109

  Feyisetan, Bamikale ^a   Casterline, John B ^a  

^a POPULATION COUNCIL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002006315     PISSN: 01622749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2648298     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Easterlin RA and Crimmins EM, The Fertility Revolution: A Supply-Demand Analysis, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
2. Ibid.
3. Bongaarts J and Bruce J, The causes of unmet need for contraception and the social content of services, Studies in Family Planning, 1995, 26(2):57-75; and Casterline JB, Perez AE and Biddlecom AE, Factors underlying unmet need for family planning in the Philippines, Studies in Family Planning, 1997, 28(3):173-191.
4. Bongaarts J and Bruce J, The causes of unmet need for contraception and the social content of services, Studies in Family Planning, 1995, 26(2):57-75; and Casterline JB, Perez AE and Biddlecom AE, Factors underlying unmet need for family planning in the Philippines, Studies in Family Planning, 1997, 28(3):173-191.
5. Robinson W and Cleland J, The influence of contraceptive costs on the demand for children, in: Phillips J and Ross J, eds., Family Planning Programmes and Fertility Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1992, pp. 106-122.
6. Notestein F, Economic problems of population change, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economists, London: Oxford University Press, 1953, pp. 13-31; Davis K, The theory of change and response in modern demographic history, Population Index, 1963, 29(October):345-366; and Hirschman C, Why fertility changes, Annual Review of Sociology, 1994, 20:203-233.
7. Notestein F, Economic problems of population change, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economists, London: Oxford University Press, 1953, pp. 13-31; Davis K, The theory of change and response in modern demographic history, Population Index, 1963, 29(October):345-366; and Hirschman C, Why fertility changes, Annual Review of Sociology, 1994, 20:203-233.
8. Notestein F, Economic problems of population change, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economists, London: Oxford University Press, 1953, pp. 13-31; Davis K, The theory of change and response in modern demographic history, Population Index, 1963, 29(October):345-366; and Hirschman C, Why fertility changes, Annual Review of Sociology, 1994, 20:203-233.
9. Mauldin WP, Fertility studies: knowledge, attitudes, practice, Studies in Family Planning, 1965, No. 7, pp. 1-10; and Berelson B, KAP studies on fertility, in: Berelson B, ed., Family Planning and Population Programs, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1966, pp. 655-668.
10. Mauldin WP, Fertility studies: knowledge, attitudes, practice, Studies in Family Planning, 1965, No. 7, pp. 1-10; and Berelson B, KAP studies on fertility, in: Berelson B, ed., Family Planning and Population Programs, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1966, pp. 655-668.
11. Knodel J and van de Walle E, Lessons from the past: policy implications of historical fertility studies, Population and Development Review, 1979, 5(2):217-246; Cleland J and Wilson C, Demand theories of fertility decline: an iconoclastic view, Population Studies, 1987, 41(1):5-30; and Gillis JR, Tilly LA and Levine D, eds., The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850-1970: The Quiet Revolution, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1992.
12. Knodel J and van de Walle E, Lessons from the past: policy implications of historical fertility studies, Population and Development Review, 1979, 5(2):217-246; Cleland J and Wilson C, Demand theories of fertility decline: an iconoclastic view, Population Studies, 1987, 41(1):5-30; and Gillis JR, Tilly LA and Levine D, eds., The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850-1970: The Quiet Revolution, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1992.
13. Knodel J and van de Walle E, Lessons from the past: policy implications of historical fertility studies, Population and Development Review, 1979, 5(2):217-246; Cleland J and Wilson C, Demand theories of fertility decline: an iconoclastic view, Population Studies, 1987, 41(1):5-30; and Gillis JR, Tilly LA and Levine D, eds., The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850-1970: The Quiet Revolution, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1992.
14. Freedman R, Theories of fertility decline: a reappraisal, Social Forces, 1979, 58(1):1-17.
15. Hauser PM, Family planning and population programs, Demography, 1967, 4(1):397-414.
16. Westoff CF and Ryder NB, The predictive validity of reproductive intentions, Demography, 1977, 14(4):431-453; Hermalin AI et al., Do intentions predict fertility? the experience in Taiwan, 1957-74, Studies in Family Planning, 1979, 10(3):75-95; Westoff CF, Reproductive intentions and fertility rates, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1990, 16(3):84-89; De Silva WI, Consistency between reproductive preferences and behavior: the Sri Lankan experience, Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(3):188-197; Tan CP and Tey NP, Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? evidence from Peninsular Malaysia, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(4):222-231; and Bankole A and Westoff CF, The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1998, 30(4):439-455.
17. Westoff CF and Ryder NB, The predictive validity of reproductive intentions, Demography, 1977, 14(4):431-453; Hermalin AI et al., Do intentions predict fertility? the experience in Taiwan, 1957-74, Studies in Family Planning, 1979, 10(3):75-95; Westoff CF, Reproductive intentions and fertility rates, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1990, 16(3):84-89; De Silva WI, Consistency between reproductive preferences and behavior: the Sri Lankan experience, Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(3):188-197; Tan CP and Tey NP, Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? evidence from Peninsular Malaysia, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(4):222-231; and Bankole A and Westoff CF, The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1998, 30(4):439-455.
18. Westoff CF and Ryder NB, The predictive validity of reproductive intentions, Demography, 1977, 14(4):431-453; Hermalin AI et al., Do intentions predict fertility? the experience in Taiwan, 1957-74, Studies in Family Planning, 1979, 10(3):75-95; Westoff CF, Reproductive intentions and fertility rates, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1990, 16(3):84-89; De Silva WI, Consistency between reproductive preferences and behavior: the Sri Lankan experience, Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(3):188-197; Tan CP and Tey NP, Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? evidence from Peninsular Malaysia, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(4):222-231; and Bankole A and Westoff CF, The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1998, 30(4):439-455.
19. Westoff CF and Ryder NB, The predictive validity of reproductive intentions, Demography, 1977, 14(4):431-453; Hermalin AI et al., Do intentions predict fertility? the experience in Taiwan, 1957-74, Studies in Family Planning, 1979, 10(3):75-95; Westoff CF, Reproductive intentions and fertility rates, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1990, 16(3):84-89; De Silva WI, Consistency between reproductive preferences and behavior: the Sri Lankan experience, Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(3):188-197; Tan CP and Tey NP, Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? evidence from Peninsular Malaysia, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(4):222-231; and Bankole A and Westoff CF, The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1998, 30(4):439-455.
20. Westoff CF and Ryder NB, The predictive validity of reproductive intentions, Demography, 1977, 14(4):431-453; Hermalin AI et al., Do intentions predict fertility? the experience in Taiwan, 1957-74, Studies in Family Planning, 1979, 10(3):75-95; Westoff CF, Reproductive intentions and fertility rates, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1990, 16(3):84-89; De Silva WI, Consistency between reproductive preferences and behavior: the Sri Lankan experience, Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(3):188-197; Tan CP and Tey NP, Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? evidence from Peninsular Malaysia, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(4):222-231; and Bankole A and Westoff CF, The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1998, 30(4):439-455.
21. Westoff CF and Ryder NB, The predictive validity of reproductive intentions, Demography, 1977, 14(4):431-453; Hermalin AI et al., Do intentions predict fertility? the experience in Taiwan, 1957-74, Studies in Family Planning, 1979, 10(3):75-95; Westoff CF, Reproductive intentions and fertility rates, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1990, 16(3):84-89; De Silva WI, Consistency between reproductive preferences and behavior: the Sri Lankan experience, Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(3):188-197; Tan CP and Tey NP, Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? evidence from Peninsular Malaysia, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(4):222-231; and Bankole A and Westoff CF, The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1998, 30(4):439-455.
22. Pritchett LH, Desired fertility and the impact of population policies, Population and Development Review, 1994, 20(1):1-43.
23. Bongaarts J, Do reproductive intentions matter? International Family Planning Perspectives, 1992, 18(3): 102-108.
24. Bongaarts J, The supply-demand framework for the determinants of fertility: an alternative implementation, Population Studies, 1993, 47(3):437-456.
25. Casterline JB and Feyisetan B, Fertility Preferences, Socioeconomic Factors, and Changes in Contraceptive Prevalence in Developing Countries, Policy Research Division Working Paper, New York: Population Council, forthcoming.
26. Westoff CF and Bankole A, Trends in the demand for family limitation in developing countries, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2000, 26(2):56-62 & 97.
27. Bongaarts J, 1992, op. cit. (see reference 12).
28. Caldwell J, Orubuloye IO and Caldwell P, Fertility decline in Africa: a new type of transition, Population and Development Review, 1992, 18(2):211-242.
29. Althauser RP and Wigler M, Standardization and component analysis, Sociological Methods and Research, 1972, 1(1):97-135; Iams HM and Thornton A, Decomposition of differences: a cautionary note, Sociological Methods and Research, 1975, 3(3):341-351; and Firebaugh G, Analyzing Repeated Surveys, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 1996.
30. Althauser RP and Wigler M, Standardization and component analysis, Sociological Methods and Research, 1972, 1(1):97-135; Iams HM and Thornton A, Decomposition of differences: a cautionary note, Sociological Methods and Research, 1975, 3(3):341-351; and Firebaugh G, Analyzing Repeated Surveys, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 1996.
31. Althauser RP and Wigler M, Standardization and component analysis, Sociological Methods and Research, 1972, 1(1):97-135; Iams HM and Thornton A, Decomposition of differences: a cautionary note, Sociological Methods and Research, 1975, 3(3):341-351; and Firebaugh G, Analyzing Repeated Surveys, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 1996.
32. Castro-Martin T and Njogu W, A decade of change in contraceptive behaviour in Latin America: a multivariate decomposition, Population Bulletin of the United Nations, 1994, 36:81-109.
33. Njogu W, Trends and determinants of contraceptive use in Kenya, Demography, 1989, 28(1):83-99.
34. Kitagawa EM, Components of a difference between two rates, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1955, 50(272):1168-1194.
35. Westoff CF and Bankole A, Unmet Need: 1990-1994, Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Studies, Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, 1995, No. 16; and United Nations, Levels and Trends of Contraceptive Use as Assessed in 1999, New York: United Nations, 1999.
36. Westoff CF and Bankole A, Unmet Need: 1990-1994, Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Studies, Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, 1995, No. 16; and United Nations, Levels and Trends of Contraceptive Use as Assessed in 1999, New York: United Nations, 1999.
37. Pritchett LH, 1994, op. cit. (see reference 11).
38. Ibid.
39. Casterline JB and Binding SW, Unmet Need for Family Planning in Developing Countries and Implications for Population Policy, Policy Research Division Working Paper, New York: Population Council, 2000, No. 135.
40. Rosero-Bixby L and Casterline JB, Modelling diffusion effects in fertility transition, Population Studies, 1993, 47(1):147-167; Bongaarts J and Watkins S, Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions, Population and Development Review, 1996, 22(4):639-682; and Montgomery MR and Casterline JB, Social networks and the diffusion of fertility control, Policy Research Division Working Paper, New York: Population Council, 1998, No. 119.
41. Rosero-Bixby L and Casterline JB, Modelling diffusion effects in fertility transition, Population Studies, 1993, 47(1):147-167; Bongaarts J and Watkins S, Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions, Population and Development Review, 1996, 22(4):639-682; and Montgomery MR and Casterline JB, Social networks and the diffusion of fertility control, Policy Research Division Working Paper, New York: Population Council, 1998, No. 119.
42. Rosero-Bixby L and Casterline JB, Modelling diffusion effects in fertility transition, Population Studies, 1993, 47(1):147-167; Bongaarts J and Watkins S, Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions, Population and Development Review, 1996, 22(4):639-682; and Montgomery MR and Casterline JB, Social networks and the diffusion of fertility control, Policy Research Division Working Paper, New York: Population Council, 1998, No. 119.
43. Knodel J. Aphichat C and Nibhon D, Thailand's Reproductive Revolution, Madison, WI, USA: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987; and Freedman R, Cheng M-C and Sun T-H, Taiwan's transition from high fertility to below- replacement levels, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(6):317-331.
44. Knodel J. Aphichat C and Nibhon D, Thailand's Reproductive Revolution, Madison, WI, USA: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987; and Freedman R, Cheng M-C and Sun T-H, Taiwan's transition from high fertility to below-replacement levels, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(6):317-331.
45. Wilson C and Airey P, How can a homeostatic perspective enhance demographic transition theory? Population Studies, 1999, 53(2):117-128; and Cleland J, Restating the obvious: the effects of improved survival on fertility, London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 1999, revision of paper presented at the Conference on the Global Fertility Transition, Bellagio, Italy, May 18-22, 1998.
46. Wilson C and Airey P, How can a homeostatic perspective enhance demographic transition theory? Population Studies, 1999, 53(2):117-128; and Cleland J, Restating the obvious: the effects of improved survival on fertility, London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 1999, revision of paper presented at the Conference on the Global Fertility Transition, Bellagio, Italy, May 18-22, 1998.
47. Potts M, Sex and the birth rate: human biology, demographic change, and access to fertility-regulation methods, Population and Development Review, 1997, 23(1):1-40.
48. Robinson W and Cleland J, 1992, op. cit. (see reference 4).