Assimilation of Problematic Experiences: The Case Of John Jones

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1992, Pages 81-101

  Stiles, William B ^a   Meshot, Christopher M ^a   Anderson, Timothy M ^a   Sloan, William W ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001992391     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503309212331332874     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Belenky, M. F., Cliachy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of know-ing New York: Basic.
2. Chassan, J. (1981). Some notes on the foundations and scope of intensive design. Journal of Psy-chiatry, 44, 34—38.
3. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1986). On narrative method, personal philosophy and nar-rative unities in the Story of teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23, 293-310.
4. Dahl, H. (1988). Frames of mind. In H. Dahl, H. Kachele, & H. Thoma (Eds.), Psychoanalytic process research Strategies (pp. 51-66). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
5. Elliott, R. (1983). Fitting process research to the practicing psychotherapist. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20, 47—55.
6. Elliott, R., James, E., Reimschuessel, C, Cislo, D., & Sack, N. (1985). Significant events and the analysis of immediate therapeutic impacts. Psychotherapy, 22, 620-630.
7. Gendlin, E. T. (1986). What comes after traditional psychotherapy research? American Psy-chologist, 41, 131-136.
8. Goetz, J. R, & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnogra-phy and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic.
9. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Change process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psycholo-gy, 54, 4-9.
10. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Heatherington, L. (1989). Toward more meaning-ful clinical research: Taking context into account in coding psychotherapy interaction. Psychotherapy, 26, 436-447.
12. Horowitz, M. J. (1982). Strategic dilemmas and the socialization of psychotherapy researchers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 119-127.
13. Luborsky, L. (1976). Helping alliances in psychotherapy: The groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome. In J. L. Claghorn (Ed.), Successfulpsychotherapy (pp. 92—116). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
14. Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., & Mellon, J. (1986). Advent of objective measures of the transference concept. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 39-47.
15. Malan, D. (1976). Toward the validation of dynamic psychotherapy. New York: Plenum.
16. McMullen, L. M. (1989). Use of flgurative language in successful and unsuccessful cases of psychotherapy: Three comparisons. Metaphor and symbolic activity, 4, 203—225.
17. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Packer, M. J., & Addison, R, B. (1989). Evaluating an interpretive account. In M. J. Packer & R. B. Addison (Eds.), Entering the circle: Hermeneu-tic investigation in psychology (pp. 275-292). Albany: State University of New York Press.
19. Pearce, W. B., & Cronen, V. E. (1980). Communication, action, and meaning. New York: Praeger.
20. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood (C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson, trans.). New York: Norton.
21. Piaget, J. (1970). Piagefs theory (G. Gellerier & J. Langer, trans.). In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Car-michaeVs manual of childpsychology (vol. 1; 3rd ed.; pp. 703-732). New York: Wiley.
22. Popper, K. (1934). The logic of Scientific discov-ery. New York: Basic, 1959.
23. Rice, L. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (Eds.). (1984). Pattems of change New York: Guilford.
24. Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, per-sonality, and interpersonal relationships, as de-veloped by the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (voi. 3; pp. 184-256). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Russell, R. L, & Staszewsky, C. (1988). The unit problem: Some systematic distinctions and crit-ical dilemmas for psychotherapy process research. Psychotherapy, 25, 191-200.
26. Safran, J. D., Greenberg, L. S., & Rice, L N. (1988). Integrating psychotherapy research and prac-tice: Modeling the change process. Psychotherapy, 25, 1-17.
27. Schäfer, R. (1976). A new language for psy-choanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Schäfer, R. (1983). The analytic attitude. New York: Basic.
29. Silberschatz, G., Curtis, J. T., & Nathans, S. (1989). Using the patient’s pian to assess progress in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 26, 40-46.
30. Snyder, W. U. (1963). Dependency in psychotherapy: A casebook. New York: Macmillan.
31. Spence, D. P. (1987). The Freudian metaphor: Toward paradigm change in psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
32. Stiles, W. B. (1990). Narrative in psychological research. Visiting Fellow Seminar Series. (Avail-able firom Department of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand).
33. Stiles, W. B. (1992). Quality Control in quali-tative research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. Stiles, W. B., Barkham, M., Shapiro, D. A., & Firth-Cozens, J. A. (1992). Treatment order and thematic continuity between contrasting psy-chotherapies: Exploring an implication of the assimilation model. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 112-124.
35. Stiles, W. B., Elliott, R., Llewelyn, S. P., Firth-Cozens, J. A., Margison, F. R., Shapiro, D. A., & Hardy, G. (1990). Assimilation of problematic experiences by clients in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 411—420.
36. Stiles, W. B., Morrison, L. A., & Haw, S. (1987). Manual for assessing assimilation of problematic experiences in psychotherapy sessions. Unpublished manuscript.
37. Stiles, W. B., Morrison, L A., Haw, S. K., Harper, H., Shapiro, D. A., & Firth-Cozens, J. A. (1991). Longitudinal study of assimilation in explora-tory psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 28, 195— 206.
38. Stiles, W. B., & Shapiro, D. A. (1989). Abuse of the drug metaphor in psychotherapy process-outcome research. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 521-543.
39. Weiss, J., Sampson, H., & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (Eds.). (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation, and empirical research. New York: Guilford.