-
2
-
-
0000893313
-
-
For a recent review, see: b) Giese, B.; Kopping, B.; Göbel, T.; Dickhaut, J.; Thoma, G.; Kulicke, K.J.; Trach, F. Organic Reactions 1996, 8, 301-856.
-
(1996)
Organic Reactions
, vol.8
, pp. 301-856
-
-
Giese, B.1
Kopping, B.2
Göbel, T.3
Dickhaut, J.4
Thoma, G.5
Kulicke, K.J.6
Trach, F.7
-
3
-
-
0028879573
-
-
For a recent review, see: Bunce, R. A. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 13103.
-
(1995)
Tetrahedron
, vol.51
, pp. 13103
-
-
Bunce, R.A.1
-
9
-
-
85033736629
-
-
note
-
2 at rt .
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
85033748660
-
-
note
-
2 at rt.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
85033748567
-
-
note
-
3SnH (0.26 ml, 1.1 mmol) and AIBN (16.4 mg, 0.10 mmol) in one portion. The resulting mixture was heated at reflux for 3h and volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash cromatography (first the organotin by-products were eluted with hexane followed by elution with mixtures of hexane: AcOEt).
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0027769755
-
-
This low stereoselectivity agrees with that previously described for a similar substrate: Ogura, K.; Kayano, A.; Fujino, T.; Sumitani, N.; Fujita, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 8313.
-
(1993)
Tetrahedron Lett.
, vol.34
, pp. 8313
-
-
Ogura, K.1
Kayano, A.2
Fujino, T.3
Sumitani, N.4
Fujita, M.5
-
13
-
-
85033745038
-
-
note
-
1 in axial position).
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
37049091461
-
-
a) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Easton, C. J.; Serelis, A. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 482 and 484.
-
(1980)
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
, pp. 482
-
-
Beckwith, A.L.J.1
Easton, C.J.2
Serelis, A.K.3
-
15
-
-
33748366516
-
-
b) Beckwith, A. L. J. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3073. See also: Spellmeyer, D. C.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 959.
-
(1981)
Tetrahedron
, vol.37
, pp. 3073
-
-
Beckwith, A.L.J.1
-
16
-
-
33845282341
-
-
b) Beckwith, A. L. J. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3073. See also: Spellmeyer, D. C.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 959.
-
(1987)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.52
, pp. 959
-
-
Spellmeyer, D.C.1
Houk, K.N.2
-
17
-
-
33751384948
-
-
β,γ (< 3.7 Hz for all substrates 1 and 2). This conformational effect would favour the transition state A (conformationally similar to E) to a larger extent than B (conformationally similar to F) in the radical cyclizations. For conformational preferences of allylic alcohols and derivatives, see: a) Gung, B. W.; Wolf, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 55, 7038. b) Gung, B. W.; Melnick, J. P.; Wolf, M. A.; King, A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1947. (Equation Presented)
-
(1993)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.55
, pp. 7038
-
-
Gung, B.W.1
Wolf, M.A.2
-
18
-
-
0000074160
-
-
β,γ (< 3.7 Hz for all substrates 1 and 2). This conformational effect would favour the transition state A (conformationally similar to E) to a larger extent than B (conformationally similar to F) in the radical cyclizations. For conformational preferences of allylic alcohols and derivatives, see: a) Gung, B. W.; Wolf, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 55, 7038. b) Gung, B. W.; Melnick, J. P.; Wolf, M. A.; King, A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1947. (Equation Presented)
-
(1995)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.60
, pp. 1947
-
-
Gung, B.W.1
Melnick, J.P.2
Wolf, M.A.3
King, A.4
-
19
-
-
0027302923
-
-
Lee, E.; Tae, J. S.; Lee, C.; Park, C. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 4831.
-
(1993)
Tetrahedron Lett.
, vol.34
, pp. 4831
-
-
Lee, E.1
Tae, J.S.2
Lee, C.3
Park, C.M.4
-
20
-
-
85033734896
-
-
note
-
The stereochemistry of cis-8, cis-10 and trans-10 has been firmly established by NMR. In the figures shown below are summarized the NOE's and coupling constants that were particularly diagnostic for the configurational assignment.
-
-
-
|