Defining the quality of practitioner research

Adult Education Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 125-138

  Jacobson, Wayne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001949004     PISSN: 07417136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074171369804800301     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. New York: Routledge.
2. Anderson, G., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. (1994). Studying your own school: An educator's guide to qualitative practitioner research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
3. Brause, R., & Mayher, J. (1991). Search and re-search: What the inquiring teacher needs to know. New York: Palmer Press.
4. Brislin, R., Cushner, K., Cherrie, C., & Yong, M. (1986). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide. Beverly Hills: Sage.
5. Brookfield, S. (1990). The skillful teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Carr, W., &. Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
8. Cervero, R., & Wilson, A. (1994). Planning responsibly for adult education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
10. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
11. Guba, E. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Jacobson, W. (1996). Learning, culture, and learning culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
14. Jacobson, W., Sleicher, D., & Burke, M. (in press). Portfolio assessment of intercultural competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations.
15. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
16. Marsall, C. (1990). Goodness criteria: Are they objective or judgment calls? In E. Cuba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 188-197). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Noffke, S. (1995). Action research and democratic schooling: Problematics and potentials. In S. Noffke & R. Stevenson (Eds.), Educational Action Research: Becoming practically critical (pp. 1-10). New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Peshkin, A. (1993), The goodness of qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 23-29.
19. Popkewitz, T. (1990). Whose future? Whose past? Notes on critical theory and methodology. In E. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 46-66). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Rando, W., & Menges, R. (1991). How practice is shaped by personal theories. In R. Menges & M. Svinicki (Eds.), College teaching: From theory to practice (pp. 7-14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Schrag, F. (1992). In defense of positivist research paradigms. Educational Researcher, 21, 5-8.
22. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
23. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Tennant, M. (1997). Psychology and adult learning (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
25. Usher, R., & Bryant, I. (1989). Adult education as theory, practice, and research: The captive triangle. London: Routledge.
26. Usher, R., Bryant, I., & Johnston, R. (1997). Adult education and the postmodern challenge: Learning beyond the limits. London: Routledge.
27. Watkins, K., & Brooks, A. (1994). A framework for using action technologies. In A. Brooks & K. Watkins (Eds.), The emerging power of action technologies (pp. 99-111). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Wolf, K. (1991). The schoolteacher's portfolio: Issues in design, implementation, and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2), 129-136.