Design and diversity analysis of large combinatorial libraries using cell-based methods

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 36-45

  Schnur, Dora ^a  

^a PHARMACOPEIA INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001923937     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci980138p     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Designing Combinatorial Library Mixtures Using a Genetic Algorithm. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 2304-2313.
2. Chapman, D. The Measurement of Molecular Diversity: A Three-Dimensional Approach. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 501-512.
3. Blaney, J. M.; Martin, E. J. Combinatorial Approaches for Library Design and Molecular Diversity. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 7, 54-59.
4. Martin, E. J.; Blaney, J. M.; Siani, M. A.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Wong. A. K.; Moos, W. H. Measuring Diversity: Experimental Design of Combinatorial Libraries for Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1431-1436.
5. Good, A C.; Lewis, R. A. New Methodology for Profiling Combinatorial Libraries and Screening Sets: Cleaning Up the Design Process with HARPick. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3926-3936.
6. Pickett, S. D.; Mason, J. S.; McLay, I. M. Diversity Profiling and Design Using 3D Pharmacophores: Pharmacophore-Derived Queries (PDQ). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 1214-1223.
7. Hassan, M.; Bielawski, J. P.; Hempel, J. C.; Waldman, M. Optimization and Visualization of Molecular Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries. AM. Diversity 1996, 2, 64-74.
8. Patterson, D. E.; Ferguson, A. M.; Cramer, R. D.; Garr, C. D.; Underiner, T. L.; Peterson, J. R. Design of a Diverse Screening Library. High Throughput Screening 1997, 243-250.
9. Agrafiotis, D. M. Stochastic Algorithms for Maximizing Molecular Diversity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 841-851.
10. For example, Molecular Simulations: Cerius2 Diversity Manager, Tripos Associates: Selector; Chemical Design: Chem-Diverse.
11. Lewell, X. Q.; Smith, R. Drug-motif Based Diverse Monomer selection: Method and Application in Combinatorial Chemistry. J. Mol. Graphics Model. 1997, 15, 43-48.
12. Young, S. S.; Sheffield, C. F.; Farmen, M. Optimum Utilization of a Compound Collection or Chemical Library for Drug Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 892-899.
13. Higgs, R. E.; Bemis, K. G.; Watson, I. A.; Wikel, J. H. Experimental Designs for Selecting Molecules form Large Chemical Databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 861-870.
14. Matter, H. Selecting Optimally Diverse Compounds from Structure Databases: A Validation Study of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Molecular Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1219-1229.
15. Kearsley, S. K.; Sallamack, S.; Fluder, E. M.; Andose, J. D.; Mosley, R. T.; Sheridan, R. P. Chemical Similarity Using Physiochemical Property Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 118-127.
16. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. The Effectiveness of Reactant Pools for Generating Structurally- Diverse Combinatorial Libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 731-740.
17. Pearlman, R. S. Novel Software Tools for Addressing Chemical Diversity. Network Science', 1996; http://www.awod.com/netsci/Science/combichem/feature08.html.
18. Austel V. Experimental Design in Synthesis Planning and Structure Property Correlations. Methods Principles Med. Chem. 1995, 2, 49-62.
19. Daylight Chemical Information Software, ver 4.51; Daylight Chemical Information, Inc., 18500 Von Karman #450, Irvine, CA.
20. MOLCONNZ ver3. 10S; eduSoft, P.O. Box 1811, Ashland VA 23005.
21. MOPAC93; QCPE, Creative Arts Bldg. 181, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
22. Sybyl6.3; Tripos Associates, 1699 South Hanley, St. Louis, MO.
23. Cerius2 ver 3.0; Molecular Simulations, Inc., 9685 Scranton Rd., San Diego, CA.
24. MATLAB ver4; Mathworks, Inc., 24 Prime Park Wat, Natlick, MA.