Gauged nonlinear sigma model and boundary diffeomorphism algebra

Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics

Volumn 464, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 19-24

  Oh, Phillial ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001919744     PISSN: 03702693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01041-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. A. Achúcaro, P.K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 89; E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46.
2. A. Achúcaro, P.K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 89; E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46.
3. M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim, J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849.
4. See S. Carlip, Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 3609; M. Bañados, hep-th/9901148; O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Oogun, Y. Oz, hep-th/9905111 and references therein.
5. A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (1988) 009.
6. J.D. Brown, M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207.
7. M. Bañados, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1996) 5816.
8. S. Carlip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 2828.
9. R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2291; J.F. Schonfeld, Nucl. Phys. B 18 (1981) 157; S. Deser, R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Ann. Phys. (NY) 140 (1982) 372; 185 (1988) 406 (E).
10. R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2291; J.F. Schonfeld, Nucl. Phys. B 18 (1981) 157; S. Deser, R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Ann. Phys. (NY) 140 (1982) 372; 185 (1988) 406 (E).
11. R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2291; J.F. Schonfeld, Nucl. Phys. B 18 (1981) 157; S. Deser, R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Ann. Phys. (NY) 140 (1982) 372; 185 (1988) 406 (E).
12. R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2291; J.F. Schonfeld, Nucl. Phys. B 18 (1981) 157; S. Deser, R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Ann. Phys. (NY) 140 (1982) 372; 185 (1988) 406 (E).
13. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351; G. Moore, N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 422; S. Elitzur, G. Moore, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B 326 (1989) 108; M. Bos, V.P. Nair, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5 (1990) 959.
14. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351; G. Moore, N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 422; S. Elitzur, G. Moore, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B 326 (1989) 108; M. Bos, V.P. Nair, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5 (1990) 959.
15. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351; G. Moore, N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 422; S. Elitzur, G. Moore, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B 326 (1989) 108; M. Bos, V.P. Nair, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5 (1990) 959.
16. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351; G. Moore, N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 422; S. Elitzur, G. Moore, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B 326 (1989) 108; M. Bos, V.P. Nair, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5 (1990) 959.
17. A.M. Perelomov, Phys. Rep. 146 (1987) 135.
18. P. Oh, Q-H. Park, Phys. Lett. B 383 (1996) 333.
19. P. Oh and Q-H. Park, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 157; 416 (1998) 452 (E); P. Oh, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 (1998) L325; Rept. Math. Phys. 43 (1999) 271.
20. P. Oh and Q-H. Park, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 157; 416 (1998) 452 (E); P. Oh, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 (1998) L325; Rept. Math. Phys. 43 (1999) 271.
21. P. Oh and Q-H. Park, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 157; 416 (1998) 452 (E); P. Oh, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 (1998) L325; Rept. Math. Phys. 43 (1999) 271.
22. P. Oh and Q-H. Park, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 157; 416 (1998) 452 (E); P. Oh, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 (1998) L325; Rept. Math. Phys. 43 (1999) 271.
23. A.P. Fordy, P.P. Kulish, Commum. Math. Phys. 89 (1983) 427.
24. L.D. Faddeev, R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1692; M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton Univ. Press, 1992.
25. L.D. Faddeev, R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1692; M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton Univ. Press, 1992.
26. Whether the ansatz (5) gives the general solution or only a particular class of solutions of the Gauss law constraint is a difficult question in view of the complexity of the constraint equation (4). However, note that the boundary action (7) obtained with this ansatz is consistent with the action reduced from the chiral WZW action, and this ansatz is believed to give the general solution of the constraint equation (4). I thank the referee for raising this issue.
27. A. Jevicki, N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 438; A. Bassetto, G. Nardelli, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 2628.
28. A. Jevicki, N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 438; A. Bassetto, G. Nardelli, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 2628.
29. i is an arbitrary vector field (Y. Nambu, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 17 (1978) 287). However, such solution does not admit a complete reduction to boundary theory, and will not be considered here.
30. P. Oh, M.-I. Park, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 231; M.-I. Park, Nucl. Phys. B 544 (1999) 377.
31. P. Oh, M.-I. Park, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 231; M.-I. Park, Nucl. Phys. B 544 (1999) 377.
32. D. Bak, R. Jackiw, S.-Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6778.
33. J.-M. Maillet, Phys. Lett. B 162 (1985) 137; M.J. Bowick, D. Karabali, L.C.R. Wijewardhana, Nucl. Phys. B 271 (1986) 417.
34. J.-M. Maillet, Phys. Lett. B 162 (1985) 137; M.J. Bowick, D. Karabali, L.C.R. Wijewardhana, Nucl. Phys. B 271 (1986) 417.
35. M. Forger, J. Laartz, U. Schäper, Commun. Math. Phys. 146 (1992) 397.
36. a,s to a subset of all possible configurations on the boundary. A more detailed study will be addressed elsewhere.
37. P. Goddard, D. Olive, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1 (1986) 303.