Property rights and takings

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 5-16

  Strong, Ann Louise ^a,d   Mandelker, Daniel R ^b,d   Kelly, Eric Damian ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Property Rights Task Force ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001872926     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944369608975667     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926).
2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922).
3. 438 U.S. 104 (1978).
4. 480 U.S. 470 (1986).
5. Supra, n. 4.
6. 483 U.S. 825 (1987).
7. 114 S. Ct. 2309 (1994).
8. 482 U.S. 304 (1987).
9. 112 S. Ct. 2886 (1992).
10. Rodney L. Cobb, "Mandatory Planning: An Overview," PAS Memo, February 1994, at p. 2. The PAS memo is based upon "The Comprehensive Plan & Comprehensive Planning," Government Law Center, Albany Law School, 1991.
11. An outstanding decision requiring that regulation be in accord with a comprehensive plan is Baker v City of Milwaukie, 533 P2d 772 (Or. 1975).
12. Golden v Town of Ramapo, 285 N.E.2d 291 (NY App. 1972), app. dism. 409 U.S. 1003 (1972).
13. Minnesota requires that municipalities contemplating public works expenditures or acquisition or disposal of public property submit these proposals to their planning commission for review for consistency with the comprehensive plan. Minn. Stat. Ann. Sec. 462.356 (2). Virginia and Wyoming have similar statutes. Va. Code, Sec. 15.1-456; Wyo. Stat. Sec. 15-1-506.
14. Oregon requires that county and city comprehensive plans be consistent with state planning goals and that regulations be adopted to implement those plans. Ore. Rev. Stat. Sec. 197.175 (2).
15. J. McClaughry, "Farmers, Freedom, and Feudalism: How to Avoid the Coming Serfdom," 21 South Dakota Law Review, No. 3, pp. 486-541, 1976.
16. Daniel R. Mandelker, Land Use Law, 3d Ed., 6.36 (1993).
17. Dolan v City of Tigard, supra, n. 7.
18. Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Commission, supra, n. 9.
19. San Diego Gas & Electric v San Diego, 450 U.S. 621 (1981), Brennan dissent (636).
20. Hamilton Bank v Williamson County, 473 U.S. 172 (1985); McDonald, Somer & Frates v County of Yolo, 478 U.S. 1035 (1986).
21. Jan Krasnowiecki and Ann Louise Strong, "Compensable Regulations for Open Space," Journal of the American Institute of Planners, May 1963, 87-101.