Representational properties common to phonological and orthographic output systems

Lingua

Volumn 99, Issue 2-3, 1996, Pages 55-83

  Badecker, William ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001860347     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(96)00005-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Badecker, W., A. Hillis, and A. Caramazza, 1990. Lexical morphology and its role in the writing process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition 35, 205-243.
2. Caramazza, A. and G. Miceli, 1990. The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition 37, 243-297.
3. Caramazza, A., G. Miceli, G. Villa and C. Romani, 1987. The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition 26, 59-85.
4. Carrithers, C., 1988. The graphemic buffer as a computational system: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Unpublished manuscript, The Johns Hopkins University.
5. Clements, G. and S. Keyser, 1983. CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Cummings, D., 1988. American English spelling. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Fromkin, V., 1971. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47, 27-52.
8. Halle, M. and J.-R. Vergnaud, 1980. Three dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 83-105.
9. Hayes, B., 1986. CV phonology and inalterability. Language 62, 321-352.
10. Hillis, A. and A. Caramazza, 1989. The graphemic buffer and attentional mechanisms. Brain and Language 36, 208-235.
11. Lima, S. and A. Pollatsek, 1983. Lexical access via orthographic code? The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) reconsidered. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22, 310-332.
12. McCarthy, J., 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373-418.
13. McCarthy, J., 1986. OCP Effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207-263.
14. McCloskey, M., W. Badecker, R. Goodman-Schulman and D. Alminosa, 1994. The structure of output orthographic representations: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 11, 341-392.
15. McIntosh, A., 1961. 'Graphology' and meaning. Archivum Linguisticum 13, 107-120.
16. Miceli, G. and A. Caramazza, 1990. The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition 37, 243-297.
17. Odden, D., 1986. On the role of the Obligatory Contour Principle in phonological theory. Language 62, 353-383.
18. Odden, D., 1988. Anti antigemination and the OCP. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 451-475.
19. Posteraro, L., P. Zinelli and A. Mazzucchi, 1988. Selective impairment of the graphemic buffer in acquired dysgraphia: A case study. Brain and Language 35, 274-286.
20. Prinzmetal, W., R. Trieman and S. Rho, 1986. How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 461-475.
21. Stemberger, J., 1982. The nature of segments in the lexicon. Lingua 56, 235-259.
22. Stemberger, J., 1983. Speech errors and theoretical phonology: A review. Bloomington, IN: IULC.
23. Stemberger, J., 1984. Length as a suprasegmental. Language 60, 895-913.
24. Taft, M., 1979. Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllable structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 21-39.
25. Venezky, R., 1970. The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.