A Case Study of Systemic Aspects of Assessment Technologies

Educational Assessment

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 315-361

  Hall, Rogers P ^a   Knudsen, Jennifer ^b   Greeno, James G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Institute for Research on Learning Menlo Park ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001813836     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: 15326977     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326977ea0304_2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baker, E. L, Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. L. (1990). Assessment: Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow (Report No. 7) Cupertino, CA’ Advanced Technology Group, Apple Computer, Inc
2. Cicourel, A. V. (1974). Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction New York Free Press.
3. Eckert, P. (1990). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York. Teachers College Press
4. Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A (1989). A systems approach to educational testing Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-32
5. Goldman, S. V. (1982). Sorting out sorting An ethnographic account of how stratification is managed in a middle school Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
6. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J (1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283-307.
7. Hackett, R K. (1993). The functions of teacher-student portfolio conferences within an assessment system Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
8. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
9. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-64
10. Lave, J. (1988) Cognition in practice Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Mellan, H. (1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
13. Orfan, L. J., & Vogeli, B R. (1988). Mathematics Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett & Gmn.
14. Roschelle, J., & Goldman, S. (1991). VideoNoter: A productivity tool for video data analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 23, 219-224.
15. Stodolsky, S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
16. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
17. Suchman, L. A., & Trigg, R. H. (1991). Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 65-90) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70,703-713.
19. Wolf, B., Bixby, J, Glenn, J., & Gardner, H (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education: Vol. 17 (pp. 31-74). Itasca, IL; Peacock.