Two examples of measurement processes illustrating Helstrom's optimum decision bound

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics

Volumn 210, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 21-25

  Sasaki, M ^a,b   Hirota, O ^a  

^a TAMAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Ayase LSI Research Center of NKK   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIGNAL SYSTEMS;

COHERENT SIGNALS; MEASUREMENT PROCESS; NON-ORTHOGONAL QUANTUM STATE; OPTIMUM DECISION; PHYSICAL MEASUREMENT; SIGNAL STATE; TWO-LEVEL ATOMIC SYSTEMS; UNITARY TRANSFORMATIONS;

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 0001784289     PISSN: 03759601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(95)00844-6     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. O. Hirota, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 755 (1995) 863.
2. C.W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory (Academic Press, New York, 1976).
3. G. Rempe, F. Schmidt-Kaler and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990), 2783.
4. M. Brune, S. Haroche, V. Lefevre, J.M. Raimond and N. Zagury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 976.
5. S. Haroche, Fundamental systems in quantum optics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992) pp. 768-940, and references therein.
6. M. Osaki and O. Hirota, Quantum communication and measurement (Plenum, New York, 1995) p. 401.
7. S.J. Dolinar, Quarterly progress report No. 111, Res. Lab. Electron. (MIT, 1973) pp. 115-120.
8. I.A. Malkin and V.I. Man'ko, Dynamical symmetries and coherent states of quantum systems (Nauka, Moscow, 1979).