Compact Implicit MacCormack-Type Schemes with High Accuracy

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 158, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 51-70

  Hixon, R ^a   Turkel, E ^a,b  

^a NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Compact differencing; MacCormack type scheme

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARK PROBLEMS; COMPACT DIFFERENCING; DIFFERENCING SCHEME; FOURTH-ORDER SCHEME; HIGH-ACCURACY; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER; MACCORMACK-TYPE SCHEME; MATRIX;

EID: 0001780864     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6406     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kreiss H. O., Orszag S. A., Israeli M. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 6:1974;281.
2. Gottlieb D., Turkel E. Dissipative two-four method for time dependent problems. Math. Comput. 30:1976;703.
3. Bayliss A., Maestrello L., Parikh P., Turkel E. A Fourth-Order Method for the Unsteady Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations. 1985.
4. Lele S. K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103:1992;16.
5. Tam C. K. W., Webb J. C. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 107:1993;262.
6. Zingg D. W., Lomax H., Jurgens H. M. An Optimized Finite-Difference Scheme for Wave Propagation Problems. 1993.
7. Haras Z., Ta'asan S. Finite-difference schemes for long-time integration. J. Comput. Phys. 114:1994;265.
8. Kennedy C. A., Carpenter M. H. Several new numerical methods for compressible shear-layer simulations. Appl. Numer. Math. 14:1994;397.
9. Hixon R. On Increasing the Accuracy of MacCormack Schemes for Aeroacoustic Applications. 1997.
10. Hixon R. Evaluation of a high-accuracy MacCormack-type scheme using benchmark problems. J. Comput. Acoustics. 6:1998;291.
11. Hixon R. A New Class of Compact Schemes. 1998.
12. Hixon R. Prefactored Compact Filters for Computational Aeroacoustics. 1999.
13. Hu F. Q., Hussaini M. Y., Manthey J. Low-dissipation and dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 124:1996;121.
14. Carpenter M. H., Gottlieb D., Abarbanel S. Stable and accurate boundary treatments for compact, high-order finite-difference schemes. Appl. Numer. Math. 12:1993;55.
15. Carpenter M. H., Gottlieb D., Abarbanel S. Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: Methodology and application to high-order compact schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 111:1994;220.
16. Tam C. K. W. Benchmark problems. ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics. 1995;1.
17. Tam C. K. W., Hardin J. C. Second Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems. 1997;1.
18. Tam C. K. W., Dong Z. Wall boundary conditions for high-order finite difference schemes in computational aeroacoustics. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 6:1994;303.
19. Bayliss A., Turkel E. Radiation boundary conditions for wave-like equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33:1980;707.
20. Bayliss A., Turkel E. Far field boundary conditions for wave-like equations. J. Comput. Phys. 48:1982;182.