Using conjoint analysis to establish consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables

British Food Journal

Volumn 98, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 5-12

  Van Der Pol, Marjon ^a   Ryan, Mandy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001772406     PISSN: 0007070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00070709610150879     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Scottish Office Home and Health Department, The Scottish Diet: Report of a Working Party to the Chief Medical Officer for Scotland, Scottish Office Home and Health Department, Edinburgh, 1993.
2. Scottish Opinion survey, The Scottish Diet: Consumer Survey, System Three, Edinburgh, 1992.
3. Cattin, P. and Wittink, D., “Commercial use of conjoint analysis: an update”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, 1989, pp. 91-96.
4. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, (Special issue), Vol. 22, 1988.
5. Desvousges, W.H., Smith, V.K. and McGivney, M.P., A Comparison of Alternative Approaches for Estimating Recreation and Related Benefits of Water Quality Improvements, Office of Policy Analysis, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1983.
6. Magat, W.A., Viscusi, W.K. and Huber, J., “Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 15, 1988, pp. 395-411.
7. Opaluch, J., Swallow, S., Weaver, T., Wessels, C. and Wichelns, D., “Evaluating impacts from noxious facilities: including public preferences in current siting mechanisms”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 24, 1993, p. 59.
8. Green, P. and Wind, Y., Multiattribute Decisions in Marketing: A Measurement Approach, The Dryden Press, Chicago, IL, 1973.
9. McCullough, J. and Best, R., “Conjoint measurement: temporal stability and structural reliability”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, 1979, pp. 26-31.
10. Steenkamp, J., “Conjoint measurement in ham quality evaluation”, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 38, 1987, pp. 473-80.
11. Loader, R., Conjoint Analysis of Fresh Fruit Purchasing: A Report on a Survey, Mimeo, University of Reading, Reading, 1990.
12. Ness, M. and Gerhardy, H., “Consumer preferences for quality and freshness attributes of eggs”, British Food Journal, Vol. 96 No. 3, 1994, pp. 26-34.
13. van der Pol, M. and Ryan, M., Methodological Issues in Carrying out a Conjoint Analysis Study: An Application to Consumer Preferences for Fruit and Vegetables, Health Economics Research Unit Discussion Paper No 04/95, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, 1995.
14. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc., Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS, Chicago, IL, 1990.
15. Emery, D.R. and Barron, F.H., “Axiomatic and numerical conjoint measurement: an evaluation of diagnostic efficacy”, Psychometrika, Vol. 44, 1979, pp. 195-210.
16. McKelvey, R. and Zaviona, W., “Statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables”, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 4, 1975, pp. 103-20.
17. Maddala, G., Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
18. Beharrell, B. and MacFie, J., “Consumer attitudes to organic foods”, British Food Journal, Vol. 93 No. 2, 1991, pp. 25-30.