Complainant-respondent differences in procedural choice

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1993, Pages 199-222

  Peirce, Robert S ^a   Pruitt, Dean G ^b   Czaja, Sally J ^b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON ADDICTIONS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001757247     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022726     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1982). Improving negotiation effectiveness under final offer arbitration. The role of selection and training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 543–548.
2. Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. (1983). Mediator-advisors: A new third-party role. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 165–176). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Collier, J. (1973). Law and social change among the Zinacantan. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law and Society Review, 15, 629–654.
5. Folger, R. (1986). Mediation, arbitration, and the psychology of procedural justice. In R. Lewicki, M. Bazerman & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 57–79). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6. Gulliver, P. H. (1979). Disputes and negotiations: A cross-cultural perspective. New York: Academic Press.
7. Heuer, L. B., & Penrod, S. (1986). Procedural preference as a function of conflict intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 700–710.
8. Houlden, P., LaTour, S., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 13–30.
9. Insko, C. A., Pinkley, R. L., Harring, K., Holton, B., Hong, G., Krams, D. S., Hoyle, R. H., & Thibaut, J. (1987a). Minimal conditions for real groups: Mere categorization or competitive between category behavior. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17, 5–36.
10. Insko, C. A., Pinkley, R. L., Hoyle, R. H., Dalton, B., Hong, G., Slim, R. M., Landry, P., Holton, B., Ruffin, P. F., & Thibaut, J. (1987b). Individual versus group discontinuity; The role of intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 250–267.
11. Insko, C. A., Hoyle, R. II., Pinkley, R. L., Hong, G., Slim, R. M., Dalton, B., Lin, Y. W., Ruffin, P. P., Dardis, G. J., Bernthal, P. R., & Schopler, J. (1988). Individual-group discontinuity: The role of a consensus rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 505–519.
12. LaTour, S,, Houlden, P., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1976). Procedure; Transnational perspectives and preferences. Yale Law Review, 86, 258–290.
13. Leung, K. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 898–908.
14. Leung, L., Bond, M. H., Garment, D. W., Krishnan, L., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1990). Effects of cultural femininity on preference for methods of conflict processing: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 373–388.
15. McCallum, D. M., Harring, K., Gilmore, R., Drcnan, S., Chase, J. P., Insko, C. A., & Thibaut, J. (1985). Competition and cooperation between groups and between individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 301–320.
16. McGillicuddy, N. B., Pruitt, D. G., Welton, G. L., Zubek, J. M., & Peirce, R. S. (1991). Third party and disputant behaviors in mediation. In K. G. Duffy, P. V. Olczak & J. Grosch (Eds.), The art and science of community mediation: A handbook for practitioners and researchers (pp. 137–149). New York: Guilford.
17. Merry, S. (1989). Mediation in nonindustrial societies. In K. Kressel, D. G. Pruitt & Associates (Eds.), Mediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention (pp. 68–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Merry, S. E., & Silbey, S. S. (1984). What do plaintiffs want? Reexamining the concept of dispute. Justice System Journal, 9, 151–178.
19. Miller, R. E., & Sarat, A. (1980). Grievances, claims, and disputes: Assessing the adversary culture. Law and Society Review, 15, 525–566.
20. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1978). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363–392.
21. Pruitt, D. G., Mikolic, J. M., Peirce, R. S., & Keating, M. (in press). Aggression as a struggle tactic in social conflict. In R. Felson & J. T. Tedeschi (Eds.), Aggression and violence: A social interactionist approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate and settlement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Roehl, J. A., & Cook, R. F. (1989). Mediation in interpersonal disputes: Effectiveness and limitations. In K. Kressel, D. G. Pruitt & Associates (Eds.), Mediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention (pp. 31–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Sarat, A. (1976). Alternatives in dispute processing: Litigation in a small claims court. Law and Society Review, 10, 339–375.
25. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.
26. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Thibaut, J., Walker, L., Latour, S., & Houlden, P. (1974). Procedural justice as fairness. Stanford Law Review 26,1271-1289.
28. Valley, K. L. (1990, June). Rank and relationship effects on formality in conflict management. Paper presented at the 4th annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Vancouver, BC.
29. Witty, C. J. (1980). Mediation and society: Conflict management in Lebanon. New York: Academic Press.