Non-Hermitian localization and population biology

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 1383-1403

  Nelson, David R ^a   Shnerb, Nadav M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001741961     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.1383     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993).
2. A. J. Koch and H. Meinhardt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1481 (1994); RMPHAT
3. see also Sec. XI of M. C. Cross and P. E. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993).
4. A recent exception is the numerical study of the effect of quenched randomness on Turing patterns in reaction-diffusion systems by I. Bose and I. Chaudhuri, e-print cond-mat/9702230
5. see also M. W. Deem and J. M. Park, e-print cond-mat/9707254.
6. R. A. Fisher, Ann. Eugenics 7, 353 (1937).
7. A. Kolmogoroff, I. Petrovsky, and N. Piscounoff, Moscow Univ. Bull. Math. 1, 1 (1937).
8. See, e.g., J.D. Gunton, M. San Miguel, and P.S. Sahni, in Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 8, edited by C. Domb and J. Liebowitz (Academic, New York, 1983).
9. C. H. Li and M. O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. B 46, 14 519 (1992).
10. D. T. Natterman, S. Stepanow, L.-H. Tang, and H. Leschom, J. Phys. II 2, 1483 (1992).
11. O. Narayan and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7030 (1993).
12. G. Grinstein, Z.-W. Lai, and D. A. Browne, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4820 (1989); PLRAAN
13. See also, M. A. Munoz and T. Hwa, e-print cond-mat/9702217.
14. It should be noted that we study here growth of continuous populations, while the actual process is certainly discrete — the spreading of a gene, as well as the change of the population, comes, of course, in quanta of one or more individuals, and are not continuous variables. Throughout this paper, we neglect this effect and study only the continuum process. Discreteness can be modeled by inclusion of a multiplicative Langevin noise term, see, e.g., V. Privman, Trends Stat. Phys. 1(1994)
15. J. Cardy, e-print cond-mat/9607163
16. J. Cardy and Uwe C. Täuber, e-print cond-mat/9609151.
17. J.-I. Wakita, K. Komatsu, A. Nakahara, T. Matsuyama, and M. Matsushita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 1205 (1994).
18. H. Berg, Random Walks in Biology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993).
19. J. Miller and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1461 (1996); PRLTAO
20. J. T. Chalker and J. Wang, e-print cond-mat/9704198
21. See also D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. A 30, 960 (1984); PLRAAN
22. Phys. Rev. AJ. A. Aronovitz and D. R. Nelson, 30, 1948 (1984).
23. D. R. Nelson and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. B 42, 10 113 (1990); PRBMDO
24. for a related treatment of convection of a passive scalar, see B. Shraiman and E. D. Siggia, Phys. Rev. E 49, 2912 (1994).
25. D. R. Nelson and V. M. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13 060 (1993).
26. D. Haarer and H. Mohrwald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1447 (1975).
27. B. Movaghar, G. W. Sauer, and D. Wurtz, J. Stat. Phys. 27, 473 (1982); JSTPBS
28. B. Movaghar, B. Pohlman, and D. Wurtz, Phys. Rev. A 29, 1568 (1984).
29. P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 6281 (1982); JCPSA6
30. P. GrassbergerI. ProcacciaPhys. Rev. A 26, 3686 (1982).
31. L. W. Chen, L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and M. C. Marchetti, Phys. Rev. B 54, 12 798 (1996).
32. K. B. Efetov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 491 (1997); PRLTAO
33. K. B. EfetovPhys. Rev. B 56, 9630 (1997)
34. J. Feinberg and A. Zee, e-print cond-mat/9703087
35. R. A. Janik, M. A. Nowak, G. Papp, and I. Zahed, e-print cond-mat/9705098
36. J. Feinberg and A. Zee, e-print cond-mat/9706218
37. I. V. Goldsheid and B. A. Khoruzhenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2897 (1998); and PRLTAO
38. P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Rev. Mod. Phys.57, 287 (1985); see also RMPHAT
39. B. I. Shklovskii and A.L. Efros, Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984).
40. A similar transformation has been used for Fokker-Planck equations by, e.g., P. G. de Gennes, J. Stat. Phys. 12, 463 (1975); JSTPBS
41. H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation (Springer, Berlin, 1984), Chap. 5. For the application to localized states, see P. Le Doussal (unpublished) and Appendix A of Ref. 22.
42. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996); PRLTAO
43. N. HatanoD. R. NelsonPhys. Rev. B56, 8651 (1997).
44. D. Forster, D. R. Nelson, and M. Stephen, Phys. Rev. A 16, 732 (1977).
45. See, e.g., G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (Wiley, New York, 1974), Chap. 4.
46. See, e.g., F. R. Gantmacher, The Theory of Matrices (Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, 1974).
47. K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, Phys. Rep. 12C, 77 (1974).
48. P. W. Brouwer, P. G. Silvestron and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 56, R4333 (1997).
49. T. Hwa, D. R. Nelson, and V. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. B 48, 1167 (1993).
50. N. Shnerb and D.R. Nelson (unpublished).
51. See, e.g., T. Halpin-Healy and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 254, 215 (1995); PRPLCM
52. D. S. Fisher, in Phase Transitions and Relaxation in Systems with Competing Energy Scales, edited by T. Riste and D. Sherrington (Kluwer, Boston, 1993)
53. M. Kardar and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2087 (1987).
54. See, e.g., R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Plenum, New York, 1980).
55. L.-H. Tang, M. Kardar, and D. Dhar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 920 (1995).
56. S. P. Obukhov, Physica A 101, 145 (1980).
57. See, e.g., R. Friedberg and J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev. B 12, 4460 (1975).
58. For a numerical evaluation of the density of states in the one-dimensional lattice model, see T. Saso, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 84, 269 (1985). PTPSAL