Spatial Variation among Counts of Gypsy Moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Pheromone-Baited Traps at Expanding Population Fronts

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1312-1320

  Sharov, Alexei A ^a   Liebhold, Andrew M ^a,b   Roberts, E Anderson ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological invasions; Geostatistics; Lymantria dispar

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001738029     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ee/25.6.1312     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Deutsch, C. V., and A. G. Journel. 1992. GSLIB. Geostatistical software library and users guide. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Doane, C. C., and M. L. McManus [eds.]. 1981. The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1584.
3. Elassal, A. A., and V. M. Caruso. 1983. Digital elevation models U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ. 895-B.
4. Elkinton, J. S. 1987. Changes in efficiency of the pheromone-baited milk-carton traps as it fills with male gypsy moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 80: 754-757.
5. Gage, S. H., T. M. Wirth, and G. A. Simmons. 1990. Predicting regional gypsy moth (Lymantriidae) population trends in an expanding population using pheromone trap catch and spatial analysis. Environ. Entomol. 19: 370-377.
6. Hassell, M. P., and R. M. May. 1974. Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability. J. Anim. Ecol. 43: 567-594.
7. Hengeveld, R. 1989. Dynamics of biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London.
8. Hughes, G., and R. G. McKinlay. 1988. Spatial heterogeneity in yield-pest relationships for crop loss assessment. Ecol. Model. 41: 67-73.
9. Isaaks, E. H., and R. M. Srivastava. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York.
10. Iwao, S. 1970. Analysis of contagiousness in the action of mortality factors on the western tent caterpillar population by using the m-m relationship. Res. Popul. Ecol. 12: 100-110.
11. Johnson, D. L. 1989. Spatial autocorrelation, spatial modeling, and improvements in grasshopper survey methodology. Can. Entomol., 121: 579-588.
12. Leonard, D. S., and A. A. Sharov. 1995. Slow the Spread project update: developing a process for evaluation, pp. 82-85. In S L.C. Fosbroke and K. W. Gottschalk [eds.], Proceedings, U.S. Department of Agriculture Interagency Gypsy Moth Research Forum 1995 U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-213.
13. Liebhold A. M., X. Zhang, M. E. Hohn, J. S. Elkinton, M. Ticehurst, G. L. Benzon, and R. W. Campbell. 1991. Geostatistical analysis of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) egg mass populations. Environ. Entomol. 20: 1407-1417.
14. Liebhold, A. M., J. A. Halverson, and G. A. Elmes. 1992. Gypsy moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis. J. Biogeogr. 19: 513-520.
15. Liebhold, A. M., R. E. Rossi, and W. P. Kemp. 1993. Geostatistics and geographic information systems in applied insect ecology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 38: 303-327.
16. Liebhold, A. M., G. A. Elmes, J. A. Halverson, and J. Quimby. 1994. Landscape characterization of forest susceptibility to gypsy moth defoliation. For Sci. 40: 18-29.
17. Liebhold, A. M., J. S. Elkinton, G. Zhou, M. E. Hohn, R. E. Rossi, G. H. Boettner, C. W. Boettner, C. Burnham, and M. L. McManus. 1995. Regional correlation of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) defoliation with counts of egg masses, pupae, and male moths. Environ. Entomol. 24: 103-203.
18. McFadden, M. W., and M. E. McManus. 1991. An insect out of control? The potential for spread and establishment of the gypsy moth in new forest areas in the United States, pp. 172-186. In Y. N. Baranchikov, W. J. Mattson, F. P. Hain, and T. L. Payne [eds.], Forest insect guilds: patterns of interaction with host trees. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE 153.
19. Ravlin, F. W., R. G. Bellinger, and A. E. Roberts. 1987. Gypsy moth management programs in the United States: status, evaluation and recommendations. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 33: 90-98.
20. Ravlin, F. W., S. J. Fleischer, and S. L. Rutherford. 1990. Shenandoah National Park long-term ecological monitoring system. Section IV. Gypsy moth component user manual. National Park Service, Denver, CO.
21. Reardon, R. C. 1991. Appalachian gypsy-moth integrated pest-management project. For. Ecol. Manage 39: 107-112.
22. Rossi, R. E., D. J. Mulla, A. G. Journel, and E. H. Franz. 1992. Geostatistical tools for modelling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 277-314.
23. SAS Institute. 1992. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
24. Sawyer, A. J. 1989. Inconstancy of Taylor's b simulated sampling with different quadrat sizes and spatial distributions. Res. Popul. Ecol. 31: 11-24
25. Schotzko, D. J., and L. E. O'Keeffe. 1989. Geostatistical description of the spatial distribution of Lygus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae). J. Econ. Entomol. 82, 1277-1288.
26. Schwalbe, C. P. 1981. Disparlure-baited traps for survey and detection, pp 542-548 In C. C Doane, and M. L Mcmanus [eds], The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1584
27. Sharov, A. A., E. A. Roberts, A. M. Liebhold, and F. W. Ravlin. 1995. Gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) spread in the central Appalachians: three methods for species boundary estimation. Environ. Entomol. 24: 1529-1538.
28. Snyder, J. P. 1987. Map projections - a working manual. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof Pap. 1395.
29. Southwood, T.R.E. 1978. Ecological methods. Chapman & Hall, London.
30. Taylor, L. R., I. P. Woiwod, and J. N. Perry. 1978. The density-dependence of spatial behavior and the variety of randomness. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 383-406.