-
2
-
-
0001378388
-
-
C. Ratsch, A. Zangwill, P. Šmilauer, and D. D. Vvedensky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3194 (1994);
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.72
, pp. 3194
-
-
Ratsch, C.1
Zangwill, A.2
Šmilauer, P.3
Vvedensky, D.D.4
-
12
-
-
0000832935
-
-
B. Voigtländer, A. Zinner, T. Weber, and H. P. Bonzel, Phys. Rev. B 51, 7583 (1995).
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.51
, pp. 7583
-
-
Voigtländer, B.1
Zinner, A.2
Weber, T.3
Bonzel, H.P.4
-
13
-
-
0030109708
-
-
L. Andersohn, Th. Berke, U. Köhler, and B. Voigtländer, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 312 (1996).
-
(1996)
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
, vol.14
, pp. 312
-
-
Andersohn, L.1
Köhler, U.2
Voigtländer, B.3
-
17
-
-
84913417435
-
-
K. Takayanagi, Y. Tanishiro, M. Takahashi, and S. Takahashi, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 1502 (1985).
-
(1985)
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
, vol.3
, pp. 1502
-
-
Takayanagi, K.1
Tanishiro, Y.2
Takahashi, M.3
Takahashi, S.4
-
19
-
-
85037908689
-
-
“In vivo” record of (Formula presented) MBE is presented at http://www.fz-juelich.de/video/voigtlaender/
-
“In vivo” record of (Formula presented) MBE is presented at http://www.fz-juelich.de/video/voigtlaender/
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
85037904738
-
-
The model is de factoa two-species one.
-
The model is de factoa two-species one.
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
85037899782
-
-
The exponent (Formula presented) depends on the way N in Eq. (1) is determined. For our model, both N at constant transformed coverage (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) give a systematically lower (Formula presented).
-
The exponent (Formula presented) depends on the way N in Eq. (1) is determined. For our model, both N at constant transformed coverage (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) give a systematically lower (Formula presented).
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
85037895988
-
-
The difference in the adatom and vacancy island decay rates (Ref. 13) resulted from a correction of raw data for STM tip effects. Without this correction, the decay rates were equal within the experimental error: (Formula presented)(Formula presented) eV, (Formula presented) (Formula presented) eV.
-
The difference in the adatom and vacancy island decay rates (Ref. 13) resulted from a correction of raw data for STM tip effects. Without this correction, the decay rates were equal within the experimental error: (Formula presented)(Formula presented) eV, (Formula presented) (Formula presented) eV.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
0032120386
-
-
A. Natori, M. Murayama, D. Matsumoto, and H. Yasunaga, Surf. Sci. 409, 160 (1998).
-
(1998)
Surf. Sci.
, vol.409
, pp. 160
-
-
Natori, A.1
Murayama, M.2
Matsumoto, D.3
Yasunaga, H.4
|