EnhancingCollaboration in Computer-AdministeredSurvey Interviews

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-99-03, Issue , 1999, Pages 108-115

  Schober, Michael F ^a   Conrad, Frederick G ^b   Bloom, Jonathan E ^c  

^a NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS   (United States)

^c Dragon Systems Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS; HUMAN AGENT; INTERFACE DESIGNS; SYSTEMIN; UNCERTAINTY; WIZARD-OF-OZ STUDIES;

CLARIFIERS;

EID: 0001720819     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Akmajian, A., Demers, R.A., Farmer, A.K., and Hamish, R.M. 1990. Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication, 3rd Edition. Cambridge, M_A: The MIT Press.
2. Bloom, J.E. 1999. Linguistic Markers of Respondent Uncertainty during Computer-Administered Survey Interviews. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Psychology, NewSchool for Social Research.
3. Bloom, J.E., and Schober, M.F. 1999. A Speech Interface for Collaborating with a Computer-Administered Survey System. Manuscript in preparation.
4. Bloom, J.E., and Schober, M.F. 2000. Respondent Cues that Survey Questions Are in Danger of Being Misunderstood. In Proceedings of the AmericanStatistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, 1999. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Forthcoming.
5. Brennan, S.E. 1990. Seeking and Providing Evidence for Mutual Understanding. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Psychology, Stanford University.
6. Clark H.H. 1992. Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.
7. Clark, H.H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity Press.
8. Clark, H.H., and Brennan, S.E. 1991. Grounding in Communication. In Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., and Teasley, S.D. eds. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 127-149. Washington, DC:APA.
9. Clark, H.H., and Schaefer, E.F. 1987. Collaborating on Contributions to Conversations. Languageand Cognitive Processes 2:1-23.
10. Clark, H.H., and Schaefer, E.F. 1989. Contributing to Discourse. Cognitive Science 13:259-294.
11. Clark, H.H., and Schober, M.F. 1991. Asking Questions and influencing Answers. In Tanur, J.M. ed., Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, 15-48. NewYork: Russell Sage Foundation.
12. Clark, H.H., Wilkes-Gibbs, D. 1986. Referring as a Collaborative Process. Cognition22:1-39.
13. Conrad, F.G., and Schober, M.F. 1999a. A Conversational Approach to Computer-Administered Questionnaires. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, 1998, 962-967. Alexandria, VA:AmericanStatistical Association.
14. Conrad, F.G., and Schober, M.F. 1999b. Conversational Interviewing and Measurement Error in a Household Telephone Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, under revision.
15. Couper, M.P., Baker, R.P., Bethlehem, J., Clark, C.Z.F., Martin, J., Nicholls II, W.L., and O'Reilly, J.M. eds. 1998. ComputerAssisted Survey Information Collection. NewYork: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
16. Fowler, F.J.., and Mangione, T.W. 1990. Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error. NewburyPark, CA: SAGEPublications, Inc.
17. Graesser, A.C., and McMahen, C.L. 1993. Anomalous Information Triggers Questions WhenAdults Solve Quantitative Problems and ComprehendStories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85:136-151.
18. Graesser, A.C., Swamer, S.S., Baggett, W.B., and Sell, M.A. 1996. NewModels of Deep Comprehension. In Britton, B.K. and Graesser, A.C. eds., Models of Understanding Text, 1-32. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
19. th International Joint Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence, 978-984. San Mateo, CA:MorganKaufmann Publishers.
20. Moore, J.D. 1995. Participating in Explanatory Dialogues: Interpreting and Respondingto Questions in Context. Cambridge, MA:MITPress.
21. Schober, M.F. 1998. Different Kinds of Conversational Perspective-Taking.In Fussell, S.R., and Kreuz, R.J. eds., Social and Cognitive Psychological Approaches to Interpersonal Communication, 145-174. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Schober, M.F. 1999a. Conversational Evidence for Rethinking Meaning. Social Research 65:511-534.
23. Schober, M.F. 1999b. Making Sense of Questions: An Interactional Approach. In Sirken, M.G., Herrmann, D.J., Schechter, S., Schwarz, N., Tanur, J.M., and Tourangeau, R. eds., Cognition and Survey Research, 77-93. NewYork:John Wiley & Sons.
24. Schober, M.F., and Clark, H.H. 1989. Understanding by Addressees and Overhearers. Cognitive Psychology 21:211-232.
25. Schober, M.F., and Conrad, F.G. 1997. Does Conversational Interviewing ReduceSurvey Measurement Error? Public OpinionQuarterly 61:576-602.
26. Schober, M.F., and Conrad, F.G. 1999a. A Collaborative View of Standardized Surveys. In Maynard, D., Houtkoop, H., Schaeffer, N.C., and van der Zouwen, Z. eds., Standardization and Tacit Knowledge:Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. NewYork: John Wiley &Sons. Forthcoming.
27. Schober, M.F., and Conrad, F.G. 1999b. Response Accuracy WhenInterviewers Stray from Standardization. In Proceedings of the AmericanStatistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, 1998, 940-945. Alexandria, VA:AmericanStatistical Association.
28. Schober, M.F., Conrad, F.G., and Fricker, S.S. 2000. Further Explorations of Conversational Interviewing: HowGradations of Flexibility Affect Costs and Accuracy. In Proceedings of the AmericanStatistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, 1999. Alexandria, VA:AmericanStatistical Association. Forthcoming.
29. Schofield, J.W. 1995. Computerand ClassroomCulture. Cambridge, UK:CambridgeUniversity Press.
30. Tonrangean, R., and Smith, T. 1996. Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context. Public Opinion Quarterly 60:275-304.